It would go somewhere if you actually gave good support to your points, or used points that made sense. As it is, all you did was highlight stereotypical advantages of Sheik that gave her the top tier position for the majority of Melee's lifespan and disregard other clear advantages of high/top-tier characters as "requiring more skill," though the exact achievement that would require such skill was never made clear.
In summary:
You said Sheik was gay. Which is a common thing to say. You said that she was extremely cheap and could be played by anyone. Which is not disputed. Then you claimed that every character took more skill to play with than Sheik.
I'm not exactly clear on that point, and I made an assumption that you were actually talking about the competitive level of play; it's becoming clear that it's more like you're talking about what you've heard from word-of-mouth. The high tier (Sheik, Marth, and Peach) all require little skill to pick up and start winning games against equally-skilled and even higher-skilled players, for a period of time. And I think that's the level you're talking about.
To which I still say that it doesn't take any more skill to dash attack > fair than it does to stand there and let Peach's priority win with dsmash (you don't need to be a fast-faller. Just approach with poor spacing and you're in trouble) or become untouchable with "well-placed fsmashes" that outrange Sheik in almost every way yet somehow make Marth take more skill to play. I don't know why you don't see it that way, unless you've had really bad experiences with Sheik or something.
So tell me, clearly, what makes Sheik take so little skill, and what does Sheik accomplish with such a low level of skill? Maybe then we'd actually get somewhere.
In summary:
You said Sheik was gay. Which is a common thing to say. You said that she was extremely cheap and could be played by anyone. Which is not disputed. Then you claimed that every character took more skill to play with than Sheik.
I'm not exactly clear on that point, and I made an assumption that you were actually talking about the competitive level of play; it's becoming clear that it's more like you're talking about what you've heard from word-of-mouth. The high tier (Sheik, Marth, and Peach) all require little skill to pick up and start winning games against equally-skilled and even higher-skilled players, for a period of time. And I think that's the level you're talking about.
To which I still say that it doesn't take any more skill to dash attack > fair than it does to stand there and let Peach's priority win with dsmash (you don't need to be a fast-faller. Just approach with poor spacing and you're in trouble) or become untouchable with "well-placed fsmashes" that outrange Sheik in almost every way yet somehow make Marth take more skill to play. I don't know why you don't see it that way, unless you've had really bad experiences with Sheik or something.
So tell me, clearly, what makes Sheik take so little skill, and what does Sheik accomplish with such a low level of skill? Maybe then we'd actually get somewhere.