TheLastJinjo
Banned via Warnings
It's not really just about him being popular. It's the fact that the character he is based on is so popular. Pikachu is arguably the most popular Pokemon of all. If not he's still the mascot. Pichu is a popular version of a popular character. That is in my opinion why he merits an inclusion.But he's not really though... there are lots of more popular Pokemon that also still appear in Pokemon games. Being more popular than YL isn't some testament to the characters' popularity, they're still by far the least popular veteran characters.
Despite contrary belief, adding clones or alternate versions of characters is diverse. Instead of just constantly introducing fans to new characters, it is a compliment to give attention to the current ones that they love so much and, in the case of a lot of characters, expanding the move sets they are familiar with with unique twists and different play styles.
Adding Dr. Mario is a compliment to Mario fans. Adding Dark Pit is a compliment to Pit fans. And it's not even at the expense of other characters. In other words:
“This is like a free dessert after a luxurious meal that was prepared free of charge. In a restaurant with this type of service, I don’t think there’s anybody who would say, ‘Change this to a meat dish!!'”
And in the case of more unique characters like Falco and Ganondorf. It's nice to have a moveset that people have become accustomed to from a character they love and seeing new and interesting changes to it. But, I guess a majority of Smash fans have to look at everything through their grumpy glasses and say "Nope. Not unique = bad. That's how games work. It's as simple as that. There's nothing else to it. I'm such an intellectual critic."
I'm not referring to you though.
I'm aware of that. But, Pichu still holds signifcance in Pokemon's history. And that's just aside from him being the baby version of the mascot.And for the record, Pichu was added to be a Pikachu clone, not because of his popularity. One clone might be chosen over another because of popularity, but the reason clones are added in the first place is to pad the roster.
And I think it's also noteworthy to add that Pichu DOES support to bring him back compared. More than Young Link.
I think the fact that F-Zero has been represented in Smash since 1998 or whenever is the reason it's so much more recognizable than Golden Sun. You may argue that's not a reason to give it a character, but I'd have to disagree. Especially when it has a character that is so important to it. I can't say that Sylux and Bandana Dee are more important to their series than SG is to F-Zero.F-Zero is a cult classic franchise, so yeah, a supporting character from a largely defunct series is not exactly something with mainstream appeal.
To put it into perspective, excluding the first SNES game, Golden Sun has consistently outperformed F-Zero. Moreover, Golden Sun had its last title six years ago, while F-Zero hasn't had a game in what, twelve years? Plus, F-Zero already has a character, while GS has none. I'm not trying to argue that GS needs a character, I'm saying F-Zero really doesn't need another. It's not a very prominent series, Smash just makes people believe it is.
Alright, I'll concede on that. Maybe it was a bad idea. I mean the ideal point of this roster was a port of Smash 4 on the NX. However if this were years later there would really be no point in having those characters unless Awakening had a sequel or if Greninja became a Lucario situation.However you're justifying it semantically, if you want to position your roster as some "addition" to the existing SSB4 roster, it still doesn't make much sense to cut characters. For an actual Smash 5 years down the line, sure, but in a game that presumably would re-use the existing assets and takes place two years after release... not so much.
That's not what I do either. I look at a character and say. "How can I make this character different." That's what I did with Samurai Goroh. And I also say to myself "Okay, he has a sword that he uses. Now I can't make an entire move set based on nothing, but a sword. So what can I use it for? That's why it's used for his tilts, his rapid A attack, and his side special. Samurai Goroh is a strong man. That's why his other moves are based on his strength. I logically come to the conclusion that "Hey, Samurai Goroh is a lot like Captain Falcon in that respect. He shares similar physical aspects and he's been shown to be similar to him in the game, including with his energy and flexibility." That's why his physical attacks are loosely based off of Captain Falcon. And I feel the move set he has stays just as true to F-Zero as it does for Captain Falcon.I think with the mentality of "clone until proven unique", you're the one reversing it. That's basically like saying guilty until proven innocent. Sakurai doesn't go into a game thinking "how can I make these newcomers similar to existing characters?"
I would apply this same logic to characters like Falco & Wolf.
I don't know about you, but when I think of Goroh fighting I see him punching, kicking, grabbing, and (like in F-Zero) occasionally using his sword. And that's what he does in this game. It's a combination of Captain Falcon's moves, his own moves, and moves using his sword. I think that's very reasonable.
I don't believe Lucas was an afterthought.he goes in trying to implement unique additions, then adds the clones and semi-clones as afterthoughts.
I will not agree with that until you show me a unique move set based entirely off of his katanaThere's an exception here and there, but what I'm saying is Goroh has enough at his disposal to be completely unique
UGH! There you go again. Removing all nuance and making things as simple as they can be. Oh, it's just a lack of creativity. It's not a lack of creativity when Luigi and Falco were made into clones. It's about staying true to their character. It's not as simple as. Sword = done!and thinking otherwise is just a lack of creativity.
Yes. When sword wielders like Cloud or Shulk or Ike were brought in, they had moves prior to their inclusion. Cloud was able to shoot blade beams, use the Limit ability and the Cross Slash. Ike has Eruption and the ability to throw his sword in the air, grab it, and slam it back down. Shulk could see into the future and change his stats.Sakurai materializes movesets out of thin air, are you're saying you can't come up with a moveset for a character who wields a new type of sword in an unorthodox matter such as Goroh?
You can't keep making new sword moves forever. This was understood with Chrom.
When making Luigi, Lucas, Toon Link, or Wolf. I don't think Sakurai EVER had the intention of giving them their own completely unique move set.Obviously characters can be clones, but since when is that the goal, other than at the tail end of development?
Now you're proving that the only person who's seeking out how to make a character a clone is you. You don't actually think it works like that do you? If that was the case you could make Rosalina a clone of Mr. Game & Watch. Starbits instead of bacon, blackhole instead of bucket, launch star instead of trampoline. Last time I checked the only time a character has become a clone is if they share similar physical aspects/body structure AND (emphasis on that word, because I know you like to chuck that out the window during this argument) they possess the equipment, abilities, or means to perform those abilities. Rosalina does NOT fit that second criteria. Every other clone that's ever existed does. And you'd be hard pressed to find a character that meets those two traits and ISN'T a clone.could've easily been a Peach semi-clone. Luma instead of Toad, starbits instead of turnips, same side special but with a space effect.
No. It's not. I have no idea what you're talking about.The recovery and forward Smash might've been different, but that's still definitely semi-clone territory.
I've already explained why there is more to it than that.Plus their proportions are almost identical even though Rosalina is sized up sometimes.
No...no no no no no. Bowser Jr. does not resemble Bowser's structure. At least Young Link and Pichu were pretty much physically the same despite their size compared to their counterparts. Bowser Jr. is EXTREMELY smaller and EXTREMELY weaker than Bowser.For that matter, Bowser Jr. could've easily been a Bowser semi-clone.
I checked out a Goroh moveset thread (Oppossums ot be specific. Had ot log out, cuz I'm still banned)No, Lucina and Chrom wield the same swords in the same way as characters already on the roster, that's why making them unique would prove more of a challenge. Goroh wields a new sword in a new way, and could obviously be made unique. Go dig up the Goroh thread, wherever it is, and see the movesets for yourself.
So far his Neutral Special is a slice, his side special is a combo move (similar to Cross Slash with Cloud), His up special is a tornado spin attack.
First off, I didn't have to read this move set idea to know that THAT was gonna be move he comes up with. So if I can predict your "unique" move set before you even present it, that's not really a sign of creativity.
And the down special is "Speed up". I don't even know where this came from. But, nonetheless, it's just a rip off of Shulks Neutral Special. Goroh just boosts his stats.
You're going to have to give me something better than this to convince me the sword should be his ENTIRE moveset.
No, I would probably just make a new mov set, but still give him the moves he shares. Which is actually the case with Meta Knight and King Dedede. Dedede shares two specials with Kirby and Meta Knight shares quite a few normal attacks. Including two of Kirby's throws.If they could, would you suggest they should be clones even when they have more than enough to make them unique?
If so, why? Without limits like budget or time, why make a clone when you could make a unique character?
And btw Sakurai did think Wario could be a Mario clone, but also thought he deserved better than a recycled moveset, so he was saved for Brawl.
Because when Goroh fights he uses a sword and when Captain Falcon fights he doesn't. And considering this is a fighting game, makes sense Goroh would retain his method of combat.
And that's what i did with Samurai Goroh. He has some of Falcon's moves, he has some of his own physical moves, and some of his moves use his sword including one of his specials.
That's an AWFUL comparison. OF COURSE HE USES HIS SWORD AS AN AT. What else was he suppose to do when he only has one way of attacking? When you're an Assist Trophy, the first thing you find off of the character becomes their way of attacking. It's NOT the same for characters. And again, Samurai Goroh, DOES use his sword in the move set.Sakurai even has Goroh using his sword as the AT, hun. He's not running around Goroh Punching people.
And?He also uses his sword to sabotage the other racer in his profile video.
And?He never actually fights in the cutscenes at all
And?but he still uses his katana more than Captain Falcon does anything related to his moveset.
Why ask questions that have already been answered? Repeatedly.I think the better question is, why would Goroh be a Falcon semi-clone in the first place?
Yeah they do. They are both muscular and they can both fight. Samurai Goroh isn't crippled last time I checked.They don't share the same proportions or abilities (other than being drivers)
Lucas didn't necessarily use the same PSI attacks as Ness and Ganondorf didn't use the same moves as Captain Falcon. But, they both share the abilities.
But, what does that prove?Where did you get the impression I said Dixie couldn't do these things? My exact point is that Dixie can do these things which set her apart even though she physically is very similar to Diddy and theoretically could employ the same abilities.
I specifically said that she does share some of Diddy's attacks outside of specials. Just like Lucas does, but not for the most part.Also, saying she's able to perform Diddy's basic abilities but not his specials, yet also saying she doesn't share Diddy's basic moves, only three of his four specials is just... the height of contradiction.
i never said that. I think I'm gonna be done with you after this if this happens again. You are unarguably doing this on purpose.Old games. Which you are not giving as much importance as current prevalence, remember?
But, why would they be? and I didn't state those as reasons for Louie's inclusions. I wish you would stop acting like you don't understand something so you can make it sound stupid when you're clearly smarter than that.And Louie being lethargic doesn't mean Alph's dash attack or tilts couldn't be different than Olimar's as well.
I'm not arguing you couldn't. I'm just arguing it would be a better idea with Louie.And no, it's not, considering both can be made to exist slightly differently than Olimar, elongated or not.
So what? Olimar wasn't the one to use Winged Pikmin.Alph has more prevalence as of late, Alph was the one to use Rock Pikmin, not Louie
That's one of the reasons I picked him. So that Olimar would have his partner and Alph would also have his.and Alph was a protagonist, Louie was only ever a deuteragonist.
So Alph gets less Pikmin? That's not fair.First of all, why, and second of all, he doesn't have to be restricted. Why not make it so both can use the normal Pikmin but Olimar gets the white and purple and Alph gets the rock?
I just don't think that's a good idea.You could even further differentiate them by giving Olimar his old recovery move and Alph the winged Pikmin.
Oh, well when you blatantly just state it like that with nothing to back it up it makes more sense.Seems rather self-explanatory. Toon Zelda isn't as popular as she used to be.
If there's another Toon game, then yeah she probably is. And she was pretty important in the last one. She was practically playable. In fact Spirit Tracks significantly bolstered her popularity.And it doesn't seem like she's going to show up any time soon again.
This is the kind of comment I would normally block people for, but we have a longer hitory and I know you're smarter than that last comment.Nah, Mario, Luigi, Peach and Bowser are extremely important to Super Mario. Toad and Yoshi are pretty important to Super Mario. Bowser Jr and Rosalina are extremely important to Sunshine and Galaxy respectively. All other times they mostly exist for filler or fluff.
Bowser Jr. is CLEARLY important to Super Mario. he's the most important character after the ones that are already in Smash. You think Sunshine is the one he's important in? Do I need to list his games. DO I REALLY NEED TO?
- New Super Mario Bros.
- New Super Mario Bros. Wii
- New Super Mario Bros. U
- Super Mario Galaxy 1 & 2
- Paper Mario
- The Yoshi Games
- All the spin off games
I just can't comprehend that you don't understand this and I'm 99% sure that you do. And you're pretending you don't in a shotty attempt to bolster your argument. You should improve your own arguments instead of intentionally misinterpreting mine.
Last edited by a moderator: