Amiiboshiibo
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2015
- Messages
- 249
Woah, calm down before a mod has to step in.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This whole thread is unrealistic. . . very very unrealisticDid I ever mention that any roster with no cuts other than the three clones is highly unrealistic?
Probably.Did I ever mention that any roster with no cuts other than the three clones is highly unrealistic?
Real talk!Of course this thread is unrealistic. It's "If you were in charge of picking the next roster for Smash", not "What do you think Smash 5's roster is going to look like?". It's asking what people want on THEIR roster, not what's likely or anything else. I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to grasp.
You know it says no more than 5 cuts. Also, cutting Lucario or Toon Link at this point just doesn't make senseExplanations for cut Fighters:
Dr. Mario:Toon Link:Literally just Mario in a Doctor's coat. Make him an alternate costume and give his Pills to Mario as a Neutral-Special custom. No real direct replacement here for him. At least he's a palette swap.Lucario:Personally, I've never really liked Toon Link, even since Brawl. Just kind of a "Why?" sort of character to me. In the end, he's been replaced with Midna.Dark Pit:A truly heartbreaking choice to cut him, but I just really like Sceptile. Originally, I had Mewtwo dropped for Zoroark too, but I took it back last minute. Lucario's relevance, I feel, has gone down overtime, so I thought it was time for him to leave the spotlight. A shame really, but Sceptile makes for a very viable replacement.Roy:BWAHAHAHAHAHA... He's a palette swap now. His Neutral-Special and Side-Special are customs for Pit now. You're welcome.Lucina:He's a lot more tolerable in Smash 4, and if I there had to be another Fire Emblem rep, it'd either be him or Chrom. However, Fire Emblem doesn't deserve any more than three reps. Four was stretching it, and five is just atrocious. Nothing against Roy as a character, it's just that the three slots for Fire Emblem were filled.Ryu:Another palette swap. That's literally it.Literally cancer in Smash. His special inputs, multiple Final Smashes, and heavy/light attacks are the worst thing that has ever happened to Smash, and if every character gets them next game, I will not be buying it. Plus, Capcom only deserves one representative. All 3rd Parties only deserve one representative.
Explanations for Newcomers:
Captain Toad:Dixie Kong:I felt that we needed another "Mario Spin-Off" representative to fit in with Yoshi and Wario, hence why they're the last three between the actual Super Mario representatives and the Donkey Kong representatives. The only problem I can see is Captain Toad's inability to jump. Maybe he'll just jump extremely low or use some gadget for it. He'll probably end up dethroning Little Mac's title as the character with the worst recovery. Captain Toadette is also a palette swap.King K. Rool:In Smash 4, Kid Icarus has three representatives, and Fire Emblem has an even more undeserving five. Why the hell does the Donkey Kong series have only four? I'm not even a big fan of the series. I do, however, have respect for the series. That's why in this game, we're bringing the DK series some love. Dixie Kong's gameplay compared to Diddy Kong is like Wolf and Fox. Similar in some aspects, but otherwise completely unique.Midna:As stated in Dixie Kong's explanation, the DK series needs some love. Smash Brothers also needs more heavyweights, as well as villains. King K. Rool fits all of these things perfectly. I don't support him as DLC for Smash 4, but I think he'd be alright to make it in one day.Impa:Twilight Princess is my favorite Legend of Zelda game of all time, and Midna is one of my favorite Legend of Zelda characters. She's play kinda like how she does in Hyrule Warriors, only she is constantly riding on the back of a Wolf, rather than sending him away then summoning him again. Moveset can fluctuate depending if it's Midna and Wolf Link or Midna and a Twili Wolf. I just put Midna's name alone because "Midna & Wolf Link" doesn't fit. "Rosalina & Luma" and "Captain Falcon" barely fit as is.Ridley:More Legend of Zelda love! Impa would be, once again, like Wolf and Fox when compared to Sheik. Similar, but not even considered a Semi-Clone. After all, Wolf has claws and Impa has a giant *** sword. Plus, I feel six LoZ representatives really helps put the series on par with the rest of the Top 3 franchises, being Pokemon and Super Mario.Bandana Dee:Scaled down, but is the biggest character in the game. Also scales up other characters in return like Donkey Kong, Bowser, etc. His Fans have been begging for him since Melee, and I think it's about time he returns. He's he most wanted newcomer by far, and Metroid needs another rep that isn't Samus. Although Dark Samus would be pretty cool...Krystal:Well, with King Dedede's Side-Special tossing out only Gordo's, there would be no confusion for him. He'd bring a fighting style not seen in Smash, too, being a spear-fighter. That, and I really, really want to see him spin his spear like a helicopter for an Up-Special. The hilarity would be endless.Sceptile:A highly requested newcomer since Brawl, and she was even directly talked about with Sakurai. Like, Bandana Dee, she'd bring a fighting style never seen before, being a staff wielder. Her specials are easily covered, and her attacks do not at all require much creativity. She'd be so easy to implement, and hopefully Sakurai will see this.Takamaru:My favorite Pokemon, he's relevant again due to ORAS, has a Mega Evolution, and he conveniently fits the Starter Trio. Greninja was the spiritual processor to Squirtle, only was vastly superior. Sceptile would be the same thing, only with Ivysaur. Sceptile would fit so easily in Smash, too.Chibi-Robo:Okay, I'll admit it, I really just needed someone so fit the spot, and I just couldn't envision Mach Rider very well without him being off his bike and being a Captain Falcon clone. Takamaru would be a very off-the-wall throwback character with projectiles and devastating up-close combat.Chorus Kids:Cute little guy with big potential. Mid-range fighter due to his plug and chord, and would be very small. I can see him being made a little taller or equal to Pikachu in size. I'd also like to see a lot of his moves end in a stun-lock, kinda like Zero Suit Samus's taser.Inklings:Imagine Olimar, but with no Pikmin. These little guys would attack in a sequence that matters strictly on timing. His combos would be based on the rhythm every connecting hit makes. You mess up a combo, you'll be able to tell because it's like hitting the wrong key in a guitar solo. Has potential to really bring something new to the game, without bringing something cancerous like Ryu's multiple inputs.Ray:Inklings would be crazy to play as! Spreading ink on the battlefield that speeds your movements, but slows down your enemies. Ink disappears when you get KO'd and you can only lay down a certain amount to help provide balance though. Dashing in Ink could turn you into a squid, but with a visible trail to help keep track of yourself. They have so much potential.Isaac:Ray MK III was an Assist Trophy back in Brawl, and he was pretty cool. The little guy flew around the stage shooting missiles, and it looked like fun. I'd say just scale him up to around Fox's or Link's height, and make him fly. His Up-Special could allow him to fly around freely like Yoshi's Final Smash, and he can attack multiple times while it's active. He does however have a tank like R.O.B., and when he runs out, he falls. Hard. As for alts, they could be either mother models of Ray, or other Custom Robos. Kinda like Villager or Bowser JR.Another Assist Trophy from Brawl, Isaac would make for a pretty cool character because of his Psyenergy attacks. He'd be like Robin, only with more up-close prowess. Isaac also has a large about of supporters backing him, which is definitely well-earned.
I like it a little bit less, but it's still good with me haha. Personally, I'd keep Lucina or Roy over Toon Link, but I respect your reasons.@ BandanaWaddleDee I edited my post in compensation for accidentally breaking the rules. Toon Link and Lucario return with Takamaru and Impa losing their slots.
@ FunAtParties Haha, I appreciate it! I did edit it though so that is fixes my rule-breaking. I made that damn roster from scratch too, haha.
Low priority characters include: Sheik, Lucas, Roy, Ryu and the Mii Fighters. These would be the first ones to be cut if time runs out. All characters cut due to time constraints would return as DLC.Realistic (65)
Substitutes are placeholders for 7th Gen Pokemon (next to other Pokemon), new FE protagonist (next to other FE characters), Rhythm Heaven character (between Inkling and Miis) and Random button (at the end).
Dr. Mario, Lucina and Dark Pit are now alts of Mario, Marth and Pit rather than separate characters.
Okay, after this talk about "cutting only three clones is unrealistic" I decided to list seven characters on my roster which are low priority (only for realistic roster).
Low priority characters include: Sheik, Lucas, Roy, Ryu and the Mii Fighters. These would be the first ones to be cut if time runs out. All characters cut due to time constraints would return as DLC.
Reasonings:
Sheik: Impa's addition and having appeared in only one Zelda game (discounting HW).
Lucas: Japan-only character, Earthbound hasn't gotten a new game for a long time.
Roy: Marth's semi-clone, initially a Japan-only character.
Ryu: Second Capcom rep, Mega Man is prioritized over him due to being more popular and having more history with Nintendo.
Mii Fighters: Technically three different characters = take more development time, "normal" characters are prioritized over them.
Thank you. I actually had Black Mage in my "bias" roster, which had a little more questionable choices. I would've included him in my "realistic" roster, but I don't see a Square-Enix rep happening (although this may change).Replace Impa with Ganon and Rayman with Black Mage and I'm sold
One of the far better rosters that I've seen put together. Good work.
Bias (68)
Ridley's size is not his problem (In my opinion). It's his lankiness. His body is composed of thin body parts, which would make him ridiculously easy to hit. His size is not helping matters.Ridley: Scaled down, but is the biggest character in the game. Also scales up other characters in return like Donkey Kong, Bowser, etc. His Fans have been begging for him since Melee, and I think it's about time he returns. He's he most wanted newcomer by far, and Metroid needs another rep that isn't Samus. Although Dark Samus would be pretty cool.
Because it's a series that keeps expanding out to give more characters, and more high-potential fighters.Personally, I have no idea why so many people want more Pokemon. Six is really all we need; not only is it ample showing, but it's also thematically appropriate (since you can only have six Pokemon on one team).
But if you want to turn this into Pokken Tournament; Featuring Super Smash Bros, than sure!
Well, not all of them actually want a new Pokemon, some probably put a new Pokemon in their roster because it's almost guaranteed that next Smash has one.Personally, I have no idea why so many people want more Pokemon. Six is really all we need; not only is it ample showing, but it's also thematically appropriate (since you can only have six Pokemon on one team).
But if you want to turn this into Pokken Tournament; Featuring Super Smash Bros, than sure!
Yes, it's Nintendo's second-largest series...which is why it has six characters. That's well and appropriate for Smash, considering it's only two behind Mario, the largest Nintendo series, which has eight, as well as representing how one can only have six Pokemon active on a team. We have Pokken now to give us our beloved Pokemon in a fighting game, and it's undoubtable that the game is going to be a big hit; and that means sequels and more characters. Pokemon in Smash need to be big for the franchise or at the very least a Dark Horse for that generation;Because it's a series that keeps expanding out to give more characters, and more high-potential fighters.
It's as simple as that. Don't limit it to a number when it is Nintendo's second largest series with the single largest creature list.
Yes, you can only have 6 Pokemon on a team but you can capture far more and rotate them around into your team as you wish.
Y'know, since you had no idea why people would like it.
True, but I'm just saying that we don't really NEED more than what we have; more than six is just sort of icing on the cake, really.Well, not all of them actually want a new Pokemon, some probably put a new Pokemon in their roster because it's almost guaranteed that next Smash has one.
Personally I think 6 is a little much as it is, but everyone has their own opinions.Personally, I have no idea why so many people want more Pokemon. Six is really all we need; not only is it ample showing, but it's also thematically appropriate (since you can only have six Pokemon on one team).
But if you want to turn this into Pokken Tournament; Featuring Super Smash Bros, than sure!
I think the fact that Greninja was planned for Smash years before he was even revealed to the public shows that the Pokemon don't necessarily need to be "Dark Horses" and "iconic" to appear in Smash. In fact, there's an interview that goes over why Greninja was chosen.Yes, it's Nintendo's second-largest series...which is why it has six characters. That's well and appropriate for Smash, considering it's only two behind Mario, the largest Nintendo series, which has eight, as well as representing how one can only have six Pokemon active on a team. We have Pokken now to give us our beloved Pokemon in a fighting game, and it's undoubtable that the game is going to be a big hit; and that means sequels and more characters. Pokemon in Smash need to be big for the franchise or at the very least a Dark Horse for that generation;
- Pikachu's the mascot of the series, so obviously he's a shoe-in.
- Jigglypuff had a very popular role in the anime, and is a popular Pokemon as well.
- Mewtwo was the first of the iconic legendary Pokemon and the strongest non-evolved Pokemon untill Arceus came along.
- Pichu represented one of Generation II's most prominent additions to the franchise; breeding.
- Charizard was, like Mewtwo, one of the most iconic of the Kanto Pokemon, so him getting a playable role was really kind of called for.
- Squirtle and Ivysaur each also let the series represent the mechanic of switching Pokemon out mid-battle as they grew tired (or their HP dropped to low levels), but they didn't have the same star power Charizard did.
- Lucario was the Dark Horse of Gen IV, unarguably one of the most popular Pokemon introduced in that generation. It was almost inevitable he'd get in Smash.
- Greninja is the Dark Horse of Gen VI and basically is the same thing as Charizard; the most popular Kalos starter and an iconic Pokemon.
- The only Pokemon I could see being "needed" in Smash are a Gen III Pokemon (maybe Sceptile to match the third-stage status of Charizard and Greninja) and a Gen V Pokemon, and maybe a Fossil Pokemon since that's such a prominent aspect of modern Pokemon games.
I consider the fact that he ended up being the more popular of the Kalos starters a lucky break for Sakurai as well.“So I guess the answer to the question is that it wasn’t based on his popularity out of X and Y. The characters that we have here we decided were going to be put in the game a couple years back.”
True, but it was almost inevitable that Greninja would be the Dark Horse anyways; it's design pretty much ensured that. It was a lucky break, but it's not really a contradiction to my reasoning; Sakurai saw Greninja and figured "Hey, this'll probably be pretty popular as a Pokemon, maybe I should put it in the next Smash game?". He's still the Dark Horse of Generation 6.I think the fact that Greninja was planned for Smash years before he was even revealed to the public shows that the Pokemon don't necessarily need to be "Dark Horses" and "iconic" to appear in Smash. In fact, there's an interview that goes over why Greninja was chosen.
I consider the fact that he ended up being the more popular of the Kalos starters a lucky break for Sakurai as well.
Pichu wasn't really in itself iconic, but what it represented (Pokemon breeding) was a huge, iconic addition to Gen II, and Pichu just happened to be easy to make as a clone of Pikachu.Also, Pichu is not iconic. He may be Pikachu's baby form, but that's like saying Raichu is iconic, which it isn't (Game Freak does a excellent job of completely ignoring it in everything). Pichu's inclusion may have been under different circumstances, but my point still stands.
You said you didn't know why people wanted not thought we needed more Pokemon. That was the point I was making a stand for. If there's any series that's going to have more characters to be icing for the cake come the time for drafting a roster for any Smash game, you bet Pokemon will have at least a few good choices.True, but I'm just saying that we don't really NEED more than what we have; more than six is just sort of icing on the cake, really.
Baseless speculation. You don't know what Sakurai thought when he saw Greninja. He may just have been fond of the design. You can't say it's "almost inevitable", that's a false rubric that we can't possibly maintain is de jure fact.True, but it was almost inevitable that Greninja would be the Dark Horse anyways; it's design pretty much ensured that. It was a lucky break, but it's not really a contradiction to my reasoning; Sakurai saw Greninja and figured "Hey, this'll probably be pretty popular as a Pokemon, maybe I should put it in the next Smash game?". He's still the Dark Horse of Generation 6.
I really, really, really, really doubt Sakurai had that in mind when he designed Pichu.Pichu wasn't really in itself iconic, but what it represented (Pokemon breeding) was a huge, iconic addition to Gen II, and Pichu just happened to be easy to make as a clone of Pikachu.
Yet The Pokémon Company is content to ignore his existence.Pichu is iconic what are you talking about lmao.
He's at least on Jigglypuff's level.
This much I do agree with, that said.Pokemon is like a megaton franchise, six Pokemon compared to Mario's collective nine is more than reasonable.
Especially considering the series has 10+ valid and popular candidates to be chosen that have a bottomless movepool and potential.
Again, I'm not saying PICHU is iconic. I'm saying the thing it basically represented as a Pokemon (the introduction of breeding in Generation II) was. Breeding changed Pokemon forever, and Pichu was just an easy way to represent a new Generation II mechanic in Smash. Nor am I saying I know what Sakurai thought of Greninja or Pichu; I'm just saying that the man must have some intuition as to what would appeal to coolness or to show big changes to the game in some capacity. I mean, everyone already thinks ninjas are awesome, so a ninja hydrokinetic frog would still be called awesome regardless. And yeah, nobody really asked for Pichu, but hey, it's showing off the fact that Pokemon breeding is a thing now, so it has some purpose.Pichu is iconic what are you talking about lmao.
He's at least on Jigglypuff's level.
Pokemon is like a megaton franchise, six Pokemon compared to Mario's collective nine is more than reasonable.
Especially considering the series has 10+ valid and popular candidates to be chosen that have a bottomless movepool and potential.
I'm pretty Jigglypuff is not that promoted anymore either. But there was a time when both got a lot of attention - Pichu got a short movie featuring it.Yet The Pokémon Company is content to ignore his existence.
As Wintropy said, I'm pretty sure he really did not care about what "Pichu" represented at all. He was a joke filler character.Again, I'm not saying PICHU is iconic. I'm saying the thing it basically represented as a Pokemon (the introduction of breeding in Generation II) was. Breeding changed Pokemon forever, and Pichu was just an easy way to represent a new Generation II mechanic in Smash. Nor am I saying I know what Sakurai thought of Greninja or Pichu; I'm just saying that the man must have some intuition as to what would appeal to coolness or to show big changes to the game in some capacity. I mean, everyone already thinks ninjas are awesome, so a ninja hydrokinetic frog would still be called awesome regardless. And yeah, nobody really asked for Pichu, but hey, it's showing off the fact that Pokemon breeding is a thing now, so it has some purpose.
...but who are you to judge "need" vs. "want"?And I'm not saying we should cut any of the 'Mons we have, I'm just saying that a franchise this huge doesn't need extreme exposure; it just gets it because it's a massively successful franchise. It's the same situation as Mario; they don't need so much, but they get it because they're the big names of Nintendo. We have more than enough of them, but of course there's still people who want more; that's inevitable in a franchise where anybody can become attached to any Pokemon. But excerizing caution is important; I highly doubt anybody wants the roster to be flooded by Pocket Monsters. Six is a reasonably good number because it has that double meaning to it; it's both making the series the most represented by characters aside from Mario and is thematically appropriate since you can only bring six Pokemon to a battle. We had six in Brawl (technically, since Pokemon Trainer was only one character on the CSS), and we have six in Smash 4.
Imagine if we got Pikachu, Lucario, Charizard, Ivysaur, Squirtle, Greninja, Jigglypuff, Mewtwo, Sceptile, Zoroark and Blaziken in the next Smash game; that's eleven Pokemon, and I bet there'd be even more controversy then than there is now about it.
I'm not vehemently opposed to more than six Pokemon in Smash, I'm just saying that it's fine as it is right now. If we got people complaining about Shulk and Lucina being "more animu swordsmen", than getting like 10+ Pokemon would cause an even bigger storm of complaints.