Kink-Link5
Smash Hero
I don't even care about astroid foxes.Eli raged so damn hard. XD
At least Kinky got half of what he wanted for spacie nerfs.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't even care about astroid foxes.Eli raged so damn hard. XD
At least Kinky got half of what he wanted for spacie nerfs.
Sveet is the only one I know of other than non-space animal dedicated Melee Purists.jesus christ now I'm bothering to read all of that and I forgot how much of a legitimately smug prick sveet is when people want to talk to him
are all spacie players like that when people discuss changes about them
So you have been playing 2.6 for a month with this change, had no idea the change was actually in the game, complained about the change when you read about it in the change log, and refuse to download 2.6b because you thought the change was only in 2.6b but have really played with the change for the past month?Meh I'll leave it at that but I'm not downloading 2.6b. Nope
The big thing that I want to know is why Fox and Falco deserve to stay exactly like they were when characters like Sheik and Meta Knight do not?
I prefer Melee as well. My main gripe is this idea that any character is untouchable, and the simple minded rigidity that it enforces. It's true that Fox and Falco are highly technical characters, but that doesn't necessarily mean that their designs are set in stone while everyone else is up for change.Im not trying to disagree with anyone, because I can see both sides of the argument. but I think that the reason fox and falco were kept the same was an attempt to bring back the more technical gameplay of melee, compared to brawl. Meta was changed not because it was supposed to be a total nerf, but it fit the style of project m better so that it would be more technical than brawls slower play style. The whole point of project melee is to try to bring back melees gameplay.
I think design overall is the priority of PMBR, at least at this stage of developing.
I guess I'm kinda biased though, because I'm a huge melee fan. Brawl had new aspects to it that were cool, like new characters and stages, but melee is agreed to be more of a technical game. Not that brawl didnt take skill to play, but it was a huge change from melee.
Even if a character is better or worse than fox or falco, I think if the character is designed well, it should be implemented into the game.
I come from a videogame background in MMOs and FPSs, and I've seen both sides of balance responses.
MMO players are so used to seeing things buffed and nerfed that while they dislike changes that hurt their characters and will complain about them, they are the first to "get over it", as in the first players to adapt and move on. They know that when their thing is broken, its going to get fixed and they need to move past it to succeed.
FPS players (specifically CS players) despise even the slightest change to anything at all. The slightest change to pistol damage or AK reload time, or the movement of a window two inches to the left (all of which have an admittedly large impact on high level gameplay) is reacted to with heavy backlash, and that backlash has gone so far as to fracture the CS community between the three games.
I have a point here. My point is that you can chose which of those players to be, and when you are playing a Demo, it's greatly to your advantage to be like the MMO player. When your character gets changed, think about it not as "Did my character deserve this change? It's negative and i don't want nerfs to my character" but instead as "Did the play style of my character get changed?" If it didn't, then it's a simple matter of adapting to the change (and in theory, you're playing your character because you like how he plays and NOT because he's good) and if your playstyle HAS changed (as in, Sonic 2.5 -> 2.6) then you have a right to question the validity of the decision and reevaluate your decision to play that character or that game.
I'm going to take the liberty of assuming you like Fox for his playstyle and not because he's good. That being the case, you should be glad that he plays exactly the same in 2.6 as in 2.5, and instead you can use your time to pitty Oracle who lost his ROB playstyle or Kink who is still mourning the change to 2.1 Zard Nair.
No idea who the exact source of this shared belief was, but it seems like a poisonous thing to their enjoyment or ability to improve at this fantastic game.By the way, who ever brought up the idea that these characters are untouchable?
Agreed.No idea who the exact source of this shared belief was, but it seems like a poisonous thing to their enjoyment or ability to improve at this fantastic game.
You just reminded me of Duckman. Thanks a lot.maybe you should get good scrubface nerdlord
mm me so my fragile and brittle ego feels satisfied and I don't have to admit differing opinions shirtduck scruburcs
It's like losing when you're outplayed is a foreign concept to some people.Bitter Fox and Falco mains probably
Bro, Brah, Broheim, Brosefs of the land
SHINE... is untouchable don't you dare touch it you filthy casuals. Go play a REAL game AKA Melee which is the only good thing God put on his Green Earth. Along with your Mom OH BURN! Follow me on Twitter, I'm the best trash talker in the Halo community I bet you could tell how awesome I am already. I hope you all quit this plebeian attempt at a game, you pitiable, pathetic serfs of Smash ur Dongs 2.6^3.1415 nerf city version
I wouldn't call it unexpected since people have been fighting about the space animals since the dawn of time, and it was not a "massive" change. Fox still plays exactly the same. He retained all of the attributes that make him amazing. Shine is still a ridiculous, single frame, jump-cancelable move that combos and gimps like no other, but you're seriously going to complain about one of the best moves in the game?P:M backroom unexpectedly makes an (agreeably) massive change to someone's favorite smashbro, let them.
Couple things:
1. Charizard 2.6 nair > 2.1 nair. 2.1 nair did not have as much utility as 2.6 nair.
2. Falcon is not dumb. Just because some players spam uairs and dash dancing doesn't mean that's how everyone plays the character. My style of Falcon utilizes all of his specials and all of his ground moves.
3. The "nerfs" Fox and Falco got in 2.6 were extremely minor. And this is coming from someone who would like to see Fox and Falco stay close to their Melee counterparts.
4. 2.6 Sonic is still extremely good and is super powerful in the hands of a technical player with good reaction times.
5. I just played a game of Magic: The Gathering with my girlfriend. It's a good night.
But the change is so large! How can we possibly be expected to play this game with the invincibility window that we all depend on removed from competitive play? PMBR, we're sick of your tyranny.I wouldn't call it unexpected since people have been fighting about the space animals since the dawn of time, and it was not a "massive" change. Fox still plays exactly the same. He retained all of the attributes that make him amazing. Shine is still a ridiculous, single frame, jump-cancelable move that combos and gimps like no other, but you're seriously going to complain about one of the best moves in the game?
If you don't want to play PM anymore because of this change, that's your right. It is also our right to shake our heads at you for being so irrational and closed-minded.
I'm having trouble discerning if that post is parody or not
poe's law is a hell of a concept
Now look here you vitriolic fiend! This is no proper way to treat a fellow smasher! Cast aside your venomous rhetoric and listen to reason!But the change is so large! How can we possibly be expected to play this game with the invincibility window that we all depend on removed from competitive play? PMBR, we're sick of your tyranny.
If you want to hate on us "for being so irrational and closed-minded," you can, but it doesn't make you any more right about its significance.
I'm a Smash Debater. Trust me, you don't want to do this.
Edit:
I could list all the reasons why you're wrong (hint: 1, look at the changelist) but it would take too long to convince you of your folly. Hence my removal from this thread for the time being. Ugh, that PMBR sure makes my blood boil!
Omfg did you not read this "I still have 2.5. I have backups of every demo." I waited for 2.6b instead of 2.6 to come out tried it and noticed the difference and switched to 2.5 Fox. I'm still going to play 2.6 just not 2.6 Fox. Mario is my main anyways and he got buffed so I'm not being close minded.So you have been playing 2.6 for a month with this change, had no idea the change was actually in the game, complained about the change when you read about it in the change log, and refuse to download 2.6b because you thought the change was only in 2.6b but have really played with the change for the past month?
Ok. Have fun with that.
Idk but I definitely do not think either are untouchable. So why nerf something if it isn't a "big deal"? That's the only thing that confuses me.By the way, who ever brought up the idea that these characters are untouchable?