I mean, assuming he's in and works like we hope he will, he's going to have a few slashing attacks, but the rest of the time he's going to be firing off buffs and Monado purges.
But I always get pretty pissed at people who for some reason think it's Ok for most characters to kick and punch, and yet somehow it's generic when only 1/5 of the roster (If Shulk gets in, we'll have 10 total sword movesets if we keep MK, which we will.) actually wield swords, two are clones, and Nintendo is a company that loves high fantasy and swords.
Why is it such a ****ing surprise again?
Besides, Smash isn't Soul Calibur, does it really matter what their weapon is? If it's iconic, why shouldn't it be there?
I mean, to add to this, Robin's swordplay vs. Ike's is much more unique than Mario and Bowser's standard moves compared.
Marth/Lucina and Meta Knight play completely differently from eachother, and Pit's swords are more like big daggers. I'm actually find it hard to understand what a "generic swordsman" is in this game, and why Shulk, who's "sword" (It's more like a magitech energy blade) is unlike literally any other in the game, including Robin's goddamn lightning blade, would be the one to do it.
If anything is a "generic swordsman" in this game, it's the Mii Fighter, but they're Miis, it's what they ****in' do.