July
Smash Apprentice
@Swords: I agree that I want to see more from EBR, such as answers to outstanding questions and an updated read on Ran. If I'm not satisfied with their responses or if they don't respond then I would be willing to vote EBR.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm trying to get people to answer a few questions I have atm.Sang not really doing anything productive either and that's just bleck.
It's not much what you're doing, but perhaps I shouldn't have phased like I did. Basically, you're just not doing all that much. You haven't really taken stances, either.I'm trying to get people to answer a few questions I have atm.
I think maybe you're confused? I did read the rules; Ran's the one who didn't read or misunderstood them. That's where this whole slip business comes into play. According to the mod info given to us, we don't know whether or not the mafia know who their scummates are. Until recently, Ran's aparently been operating under the belief that every member of the mafia is basically a Traitor who needs to find their fellow mafiats—in fact, that's pretty much the basis for every scum pick he mentioned in his 127. This is a weird thing for a townie to just assume on their own, to me. And now that he basically has no reason to suspect any of his previous suspects, he apparently still thinks Swords and I are scum for...literally, no given reason.a good example of that would be circus, i was fine with him until his vote on Ranmaru, and stating that he thought he found a slip on ran when he was talking about how mafia didn't know their partners, it reads reach to me in that example, but..i can't be selectively accusatory, circus probably just didn't read the thread rules, as shown that it was indeed in the thread rules, but i do have some questions pertaining to his pressure of ranmaru, which i'll get to in a moment.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.I did read the rules; Ran's the one who didn't read or misunderstood them. That's where this whole slip business comes into play. According to the mod info given to us, we don't know whether or not the mafia know who their scummates are. Until recently, Ran's aparently been operating under the belief that every member of the mafia is basically a Traitor who needs to find their fellow mafiats—in fact, that's pretty much the basis for every scum pick he mentioned in his 127. This is a weird thing for a townie to just assume on their own, to me. And now that he basically has no reason to suspect any of his previous suspects, he apparently still thinks Swords and I are scum for...literally, no given reason.
Am I certain Ran is scum? No. As you pointed out, I'm willing to believe that Ran is just being Ran, to a certain extent. And seeing Ran's wagon build like this does make me a little nervous, even though I'm on it. Seeing Dark Horse pop out of nowhere just to throw a vote on Ran when he already had 4 on him, and then recede back into the shadows...I'd be lying if I said things like that sit completely right with me, even though I agree with what he's saying. But to brush off this particular gaff on "Ran just being Ran," is foolish in my opinion. It's shady, and people should be recognizing it, even if he doesn't end up being the lynch toDay (though I think he'd be a good choice).
Really, I'm shady? You should definitely show what I've done that is shady because I think you're full of it.@Swiss: for all of the things you have pointed out, I feel that your vote should probably be somewhere else besides Moth right now. Moth simply joke voted you, whereas people like RR and Gova/Raziek have actually done things a bit shady. So is the Moth vote still worth it?
@Gova and Raziek: Not true. Stuff has definitely happened, don't be lazy.
Hmmm. I was V/LA during the time of this post but why single one person out of so many...? I would think you might make a general post calling out inactives/lurker/missing people.Vote: Gova
No posts that I remember other than that nothing was happening, would like at least one scum pick from him and why.
What do you mean by this? If you think he's town it shouldn't be hard to unvote him unless you're scum and you can't think of a legit reason to vote someone else.i'm going to be honest and say i'm against this ranmaru pressure, it's a very easy wagon to join, the hard part is getting off of it.
@People who answered Ran's questions. Why did you answer them? I would prefer an answer other than "Just Cause" but if you don't have one that's ok too.You mean this. If you are then yes. I didn't care whatsoever. I was bored and saw them so I was like "why the hell not?" so I did it. If that's why you dislike me, then I'm okay with this.
Cool, lying about stuff already. I definitely gave my input even though it was a one liner.Gova- Has six posts, but there are people with only 2 or 3 posts that have more content than him :-/ RVS vote, random comment, two comments and a pic @mod, and then the comment that he is checking in and nothing is happening. At that point Ran had posted his set of questions, EBR had rebutted, RR had provided his reasons for disliking the questions, and Gova provided input on none of that.
I didn't see anywhere that you were V/LA so I didn't know that. However, as I explained in my last post you still had less content than some people who posted only two or three times, the only people who have less content than you are Acrostic and TC and they seem to be straight-up inactive so far. You were here the first couple days of the Day at least and still managed to not give your opinion on anything.Hmmm. I was V/LA during the time of this post but why single one person out of so many...? I would think you might make a general post calling out inactives/lurker/missing people.
Which post was that? The only post I found that takes any kind of stance on anything is this one:Cool, lying about stuff already. I definitely gave my input even though it was a one liner.
Where you say that nothing is happening, which wasn't true, and then second Ryker's reasons for why you wouldn't answer Ran's questions. That's not giving your input, it's regurgitating Ryker's AND even in this post (#209) I still have no idea what's going on in your head. Do you have scum picks, and if so, who? And what is your read on Ran? You've asked others questions about Ran and the Ran wagon but at the end of this post you infer that you say that you need to get a better understanding of the situation yourself, so I want to know what your opinion is on it.Checking in, nothing has happened. Won't be answering Ran's questions. Ryker's already covered why.
Would matter to see if she would unvote or leave her vote on me. She was busy though so it doesn't matter anymore. Why do you ask?Why does that matter?
![]()
Because I didn't mind answering them, if there were any questions I thought could be used for scummy purposes I wouldn't have answered but I didn't reveal anything people don't know from playing with me anyways.
SQUEEK. That's a dolphin noise I think.Rawr. I know you were hoping for dolphin noises but...that's hard.
Those points are irrelevent now. I thought scum didn't know their partners, but I realized that Nabe said he wouldn't reveal if they did or not. So I mis-read that rule. That is why I dropped my scum picks of RR, Sang, and Soup for THOSE reasons.What do your first two points even mean? And the italicized point just doesn't make sense, I absolutely agree with Soup's reasoning and having been in a game with you where RQS was used and worked relatively well I'm not surprised to see you use it here.
My problem with your reads is that you seem to be focused on scum looking for their partners and all I see are scum via connections and mostly rooted in assumptions about scum hunting for scummates which we aren't even sure is the case.
Ah ok thank you for clarifying.Also, @Ran: I was making dinner and trying to post at the same time but that was a very stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------alright, things are kicking back up a bit, and i've died in some games, i'm gonna focus my
attention on this game until then.
I agree with you 100% july with ran, and actually, i'm glad you agree with me too, but yes, there are some things that bother me about ranmaru, but i don't think that weighs with some other people.
a good example of that would be circus, i was fine with him until his vote on Ranmaru, and stating that he thought he found a slip on ran when he was talking about how mafia didn't know their partners, it reads reach to me in that example, but..i can't be selectively accusatory, circus probably just didn't read the thread rules, as shown that it was indeed in the thread rules, but i do have some questions pertaining to his pressure of ranmaru, which i'll get to in a moment.
i'm not sure if i like J, i would expect J to be more a presence, and would like to see him follow up on his questions.
I kinda do like my vote on SMoth, swiss influenced or not, it would be great to see him peek in here and see how he responds, because if i unvote i'm afraid he'll just continue to lurk.
No. I have said before I have only hoped for further discussion.Ermm, wait you thought it would help you figure out players over while the question wouldn't role-fish?
How was that omgus?OMGUS? Looks like it here.
I didn't really know if that was something we should have talked about or not so I just did. Whatevz....say wat? Why did you reveal the last part? Not like it matters since that is doesn't tell me your alignment so it's null.
The Circus + RR connections are irrelevant now. I was talking about his #126. Irrelevant now. He only really pushed on Gova and Raz for inactivity, nothing else. Notice how he doesn't really give a read on Swiss, just states that he doesn't have a problem with swiss yet.I don't get where Circus+Ryu came from at all. Where did the fence sitting come from either?
Yes, I don't have soup as a scum pick anymore since some of my points are now irrelevant. I have new leads though that I will follow through with this post and others afterwards.Didn't you just say Soup was possible scum then you flipped on that and said you don't?
Then you drop your scum picks because of a point I fail to see would matter at this point.
If you aren't sure about his intentions, why not ask?@Soup: Circus I feel has been stimulating conversation and while I disagree with the fact that it was a scum slip, I think that he has at least been scumhunting. Not so sure about his intentions, but for now I think that he is contributing and actually providing support for his accusations so I'm alright with him.
Not at all, I don't get shallow vibes from him at all.EBR is right about ranmaru, and the vote is warranted, but it's just..shallow, per se, anyone else getting those vibes?
Well my first point is irrelevant because I was thinking you might have been looking for a partner, but that was my mistake. xDFirst off, unvote
I don't like having my vote on J and it's long past overdue to unvote an RVS vote. Regardless...
@Everyone voting Ran atm. Could you explain to me why you're voting him?
What exactly are you getting at here? He said something that I was confused about, I asked him, he answered. It seemed like he didn't like the questions when he answered that and I wanted clarification on what he didn't like.
@J. Who, out of Swiss and Ran, do you think are scum?
@July. Can you remind me why your voting Gova?
Now that she responded to you, I have to comment. I remember hydraing with her in Into Africa, a game that just now finished on MS. Point is, I got a lot of heat during the RVS for voting someone who self-voted. Anyways, later on she comes in, and votes Peregine, who was lurking and didn't do much. Essentially, she voted someone who she knew wouldn't attack as hard.July's Gova vote seemed to come out of nowhere and seemed like an easy way to apply pressure. Can you show why you choose Gova over others who have the same problem?
Then there's your Joey thing which I would like for you to explain more.
However, I did like the exchange between her and Soupa. Hmm....
I agree with this, good point.About Joey/Sang interaction: I didn't really get anything from it. Sang's questioning useless. I don't see how anyone could of gained any valuable information from what happened. Sang's slightly suspicious for this, but I'm not thinking too much of it honestly.
Well you state that EBR's vote on me looked bad. Thus that was not good reasoning, because his push seemed legit, although wrong. Essentially, you didn't really look if his intentions were that of scum, but you picked sides. Thus why I think you are scum. No, I didn't take my scum read on Circus and you back. Just on the other three related to my mistake.My goodness this came entirely out of the blue. Um, pretty much what Circus saids below is my response, so yeah.
How is my actual reasoning bad? How was I fence sitting at all? Or are you taking your scum read back from me (that's what it seems like as of late)?
Heh, it's not about not having the balls to vote him. Course I have the balls. But I don't think he's scum, so what you say is irrelevant. I have a town read on him. I want him to say more though.@Everyone: Who else has enough balls to vote EBR? If you're not suspicious of him, than tell me why now, or direct me to where you said you didn't want to vote him for connivance so we can discuss this now.
What exactly made you re-read her?SangfroidWarrior- Also most memorable for her conversation with aa, but I reread her and she's asking questions and actually trying to get people to substantiate their reads which a lot of people haven't or they've disagreed with Ran but haven't been clear if they are suspicious of him or not. So it looks like she's trying to get some more content out her, and I like that.
Null, because like I said all I remembered was her discussion with aa. Also, at your reads section, I didn't just reread her, I reread everyone that wasn't really active and that didn't stand out on my first read because so many people were just null. And I thought it was pretty clear that I'm trying to read into Circus' intentions and for now they seem pro-town but having never played with him I want to see more from him.What was your read on her before you re-read her?
Okay, as per the last part, I know that. But it seems like a lot of people have joined Ran's wagon for no reason whatsoever.FoS Sang
Questioning is good, but asking people to remind you why they're voting somebody? Lazy, and if not lazy, fluffy. Saying 'I want people to answer my questions' is one way of feigning activity. I did the same as newbscum an eon ago.
I don't want to be mean, but you gotta start analysing, gotta start contributing more. Poor call coming from me, but still, it's not as if there's no information about why people are voting Ran, nor is there a lack of stuff to look at right now.
Okay, first of all, I'm trying to get people to substantiate their reads more because, as Soup said, it's a very easy wagon to join with little to no solid evidence. Next, you're right. I have taken stances either because I'm just flustered with my other games. Not really an excuse but I have been prioritizing them when I shouldn't have. Working on remidying that now.It's not much what you're doing, but perhaps I shouldn't have phased like I did. Basically, you're just not doing all that much. You haven't really taken stances, either.
Because, right now, I don't see anything to be gained from it. I might come back to it later but, at the moment, I could see Joey just saying that just to tag along with RR but, honestly, I was just trying to make sure I understood the context behind his wording. People are calling it useless because it, basically, was. I dislike how people are trying to pin scum on me just because of my interaction during this. I don't understand how anybody could get any type of read from that.Anyways, you don't seem to be doing much. I mean, you wanted clarification on it, but WHY? You said "Ok, thanks" and didn't do anything with it.
Sure thing. Trying to catch up but I'll have it before I go to bed tonight.Ran said:I also want to see 2-3 scumpicks, with reasoning. K thx?![]()
Oh sorry. I must have imagined EBR voting & calling you anti-town you for RQS and Swiss saying you're letting RQS take it's time right before the post where you voted to me just because I haven't posted. I thought you were switching to an easy target to look helpful and not relying soley on the RQS despite being the one to start it. My mistake.The first part of you sentence has NOTHING to do with the heat I've taken. I have seen you view before and have addressed to your lurkiness.
PROBLEM?![]()
Considering I've only posted once before this one, is that really all that surprising? Are you really taking advantage of this to make your vote look more justified?Also, you haven't even taken a stance on anything. That I no likey
I'd disagree. EBR's voting accusing you of being anti-town did a better job. Your RQS just sat around and waited for other players to get around to it. In fact, you only replied to RR for choosing not to answer them.I personally got discussion started. There was no leads for me to use.
And it worked. Even Swords was able to get a read on EBR from it.
Didn't Soup ask the same basic question earlier in #79? Also you're first post for the game, and you only question the questions after several others have questioned the intent of the questions? You're just going with the flow. What else have you looked at?Ran, what do you hope to accomplish with these questions, aside from gettin everyone out of rvs? are you going to use these later, or immediately forget about them wants we're out of RVS?
EBR's idea of an elaborate scum plan is BS, but when asking this, are you really expecting him to explain a reason behind throwing those names out?Why J or Swiss?
I find this worth noting.Gova and Raziek have each come into the thread to state that they have read up/are keeping up with the game, but have chosen not to actually participate in any of the recent happenings. I consider Raziek to be a worse offender for the simple fact that Gova claimed that "nothing has happened" and that's why he's not saying anything. Whereas Raziek apparently disagrees with that, but still isn't contributing to the conversation.
What is this? I don't evenCourse you don't.
- You are being very fence sitty. You are trying to attack Gova and Raziek because you'd think they are most likely town who seem scummy to you and are safe bets for not attacking your own scum mates. You do the same with July too.
- You don't really have a read on Swords, because you think he's scum, but with you. You have RR as town because people find him scummy, and he can possibly be your mate.
- most of everyone has been defending me. You and Swords think I'm your scum mate thus you are ok with agreeing with Swords that I'm just being me. I just seem to be scummy because of my playstyle and how I don't communicate well.
- Swords attacked Kuz/Ryker with bad reasoning. Swords most likely thought EBR was right (which he wasn't) and attacked him to get heat off me. I liked their attack and was town motivated in my POV. Swords fence sat as well and picked Kuzi hydra to attack. You are trying to distance off of Swords by disagreeing with his EBR read, without really giving a read on EBR.
- Soup is possible scum because he seemed to find my questioning pro-town. (Course it was tho) He's the most legit though so I wouldn't really suspect him unless I ran out of leads.
- I believe Sang is newbie scum looking for her partner. I think the Sang v Joey is a good example of this. I don't know what exactly she was trying to get at.
- J is town because he is looking for what I'm looking for. (I think) He's essentially looking for scum TRAITORS.
I still don't like TCat not posting much content but I'll keep a null read on her for now and I fully expect CONTENTTTTT. GIMMEH COOKIEZ
Everyone, keep in mind that scum have to be active so they can find their mates. So essentially I don't think lurkiness is much of a tell early on when the themes still not guessed right.
AND GUESS WHAT. I GUESSED IT N0 AND GOT IT WRONG. LOLZ
I'll respond to Ran more directly in a little bit, but for now...
...I think the underlined here is a straight up scumslip for Ran. I think Ran knows that scum have to look for scummates because he is scum.
I love your observations. But, do you think a RanScum would truly expect to sway people with that stupidly flawed logic?Actually, I'm not even going to get into a dissection of Ran's 130 because of how fundamentally flawed his thinking seems to be in it. It's just wrong from start to finish. I'm being "fence sitty?" It's half way through D1 in a 20-person game. A fifth of those people have been so inactive that they just got prodded. You fault me for not having a read on Swords clear enough to your liking (although I did give a light opinion on him), yet he's only made, what, 2 real posts the whole game so far? How strong do you expect my read on someone like that to be? Frankly, I've been more up front with my reads than most of the players in this game, so far. And others already pointed out how reachy your other points were. I mean, reachy isn't even the word. That reasoning for your Soup read is bananas. And trying to wave a magic wand over what you said with your new-found understanding of the rules ain't gonna fly. I can't figure why you, as town, would just assume that basically every member of the mafia in this game is a Traitor. That's a crazy leap to make without additional knowledge. Your reasoning seems to be "well, I've played in games with Traitors before." Like, what?
Quoting this for importance. If Ran flips scum, this might be pretty telling.
-dead-
What would make you say this? No one asked. Everyone was supposed to guess at the theme N0. In fact, everyone is supposed to guess the theme every single Day and Night phase until they get it right. Why would you confirm that you haven't gotten it right yet? If you are town, then you just told scum that you're still Vanilla for no reason.
Is this really all you two are going to do?
So much scum.
Curious. Was there anything in his actions regarding the RQS that make you think they were pro-town intentions, or was it just because he started RQS?I agree with this about Ran, the questions aren't really going to stimulate deep conversation but RVS v. RQS I'd prefer RQS anyways and I think Ran had pro-town intentions with it of getting conversation going.
That seemed out of nowhere.Vote: Gova
No posts that I remember other than that nothing was happening, would like at least one scum pick from him and why.
Anything specific to make you think there's town intent, or is it just a general 'feel'?If I had to choose between Swiss and Ran based on their posts now, I'd go Swiss. Just because his posts are a whole lot of nulls and pretty much not doing anything besides him doing things that seems random. Ran, on the other hand, I see more of a town intent behind his posts because he seems to be trying to find scum and I don't think his "slip" Circus has pointed out is really a slip.
Do agree with this.Where you say that nothing is happening, which wasn't true, and then second Ryker's reasons for why you wouldn't answer Ran's questions. That's not giving your input, it's regurgitating Ryker's AND even in this post (#209) I still have no idea what's going on in your head. Do you have scum picks, and if so, who? And what is your read on Ran? You've asked others questions about Ran and the Ran wagon but at the end of this post you infer that you say that you need to get a better understanding of the situation yourself, so I want to know what your opinion is on it.
Whywhywhy do I not like this post? Not interested in hearing new reasoning. I would like to know your original reason for agreeing with Ryker. Or were you just agreeing blindly?@July, my input is that I'm agreeing with Ryker. Don't expect me to BS new reasoning out of thin air. And nothing was happening at the time of that post. I've explained that already.
Was it? I thought I had read somewhere that there was a reason for her vote? Oh well, doing a reread right now so if I find it I'll point it out.A little rustling and I find July's Gova vote is probably pressure to get him to talk.
I want everyone that is voting RR to answer, but DH is one that I'm most curious about.aussie said:You should have at least mentioned Dark Horse, he's been an absolute non-presence. At least we agree on this, since he's literally done nothing but dance about that one post of Ran's and failed to follow up to any level.
@First part, I would like to know your original reason for agreeing with Ryker, I mean July. Or were you just agreeing blindly?Do agree with this.
Whywhywhy do I not like this post? Not interested in hearing new reasoning. I would like to know your original reason for agreeing with Ryker. Or were you just agreeing blindly?
It promotes rampant theory discussion and conflicts completely based off of clashes in mafia creed. It is not the right kind of conflict at all. It's also the only thing that will be widely discussed if your topic takes hold which I do not intend to let it do. This is why I'm voting you. Your manuever is anti-town and I think it is one that a mafia scummate told you to do. Most likely Swiss or J. I do not think you came up with it on your own.
Why are those good things to talk about? How does knowing who I am wary of and who I am not help you get a read on me? There is no stance there. There is no substance. It's all a big pot of null, so don't try and pass it off as more than that.
Writing him off as easy to read allows yourself to be more easily swayed on less information. It takes a lot less for me to clear you than it does for me to clear Swiss. I think that writing Moth off is a bad plan for a townie.
I've played with everyone on this playerlist in at least one completed game. What do you gain from asking that question?
I'll look into it. Thanks for pointing that out. And haha of courseEBWOP for Sang: RR > Ran
Right after she votes Gova, she mentions that only posts she remembers are that 'nothing is happening', and that she wants a scumpick or two. Seems like pressure to talk, but that's how I interpret it.
If that's your intent, that's alright. Still friends?
Aw, a mirror comeback. How original.@First part, I would like to know your original reason for agreeing with Ryker, I mean July. Or were you just agreeing blindly?
@Second part, bolded for emphasis.
It could help later on but, atm, not much of one besides what I said earlier about him possibly just doing that to simply tag along and get out of the line of fire but I don't see that right now.@Sang:
Oh ok. Did it help you get a read on Joey? And thank you I fully await them. : D