Underlined, just the reason scum would do that. Again, it is wifom, and I don't think you are really thinking of both sides here and are giving jumping to conclusions with your LDR town read.
Bold, talk to me about it being speculative. How does this effect your read?
I mean that you have your theory that it could be scummy, that he could have used it as scum to wifom, I have my theory that your theory is way too complicated and that I think its more likely as scum he would avoid that attention. BUT you disagree with that so you are just going to keep your opinion, and I'm going to keep asserting mine, and its going to lead to worthless discussion because neither of us can read his mind and see who is right. Like I said I don't think he had scum intent in doing it and I've tried to move on and focus on his play since then like his push on Mentos because I like the points he made about Mentos, especially in the beginning of the Day, and I think that he is genuinely scumhunting and finds Mentos scummy, which is townie.
Bold, what content? Why is it good?
Underlined, what does this mean?
Content as in he commented on Macman's vote on Marshy, he's commented on Swords, he commented on me, he commented on J, so he's made connections and is active. Why is it good? Because when people are active it means that more people are involved in the discussion, they make connections and such...I don't understand exactly what you are asking, content is good because it helps read someone.
Underlined: If someone posts stream of consciousness then it seems like they are posting what they are thinking at the time, it's not constructed or faked or thought out too much. I don't know exactly what you want me to clarify :-/
Mmm. You give a read list, and put WL down as fine. Not Null. But fine. You say you are conflicted with him, yet you have only asked him one question. Let me get to that:
You asked him about Marshy and Macman. Now tell me, why did you ask him about those two, without even stating a read on them afterwards or even a mention before hand?
I didn't say town. How does "fine" translate to "town" more than "null"? Honestly, "fine" was more along the lines of "not willing to lynch" because I'm still getting a read on him, even though apparently that's not allowed because you and J are acting like that's the worst thing in the world.
You also stated that you liked him for being observant. This doesn't show signs of confliction to me. Can you explain this?
I do remember that, I liked that he understood my Mentos push because I don't feel like many people took it seriously. Then he had a lot more posts about J and people he didn't want to die and I didn't know what to make of his intent so null overall.
Bold, you admit your attack on Mentos was reachy. Can you go into what exactly may have been a reach, and show if it effects your read on Mentos?
I've definitely already addressed this but the part where I speculated about Inception Mafia and him assuming EE was town. AND I already stated that his answer made me feel better about that specifically because I didn't realize he was saying LDR indie/town based on mechanics, but I still don't like Mentos because he hasn't given a read on anyone or scumhunted on anyone other than LDR.
I have engaged with WL. I also was waiting for you to post to respond to me. You and him were the only people of interest to me besides LDR. Everyone else didn't stand out to me. I read to see if there was anything that I may have wanted to ask/talk about, but there was nothing really.
Alright fair enough, but with the bolded I feel like you say that about yourself but aren't looking at my pov for the discussion on WL. You say that no one else stands out to you, I'm guessing that means you don't have a strong read on them, so fine. But you are insistent I state a read on WL or why I don't have a read on him and and you don't seem to understand that I'm having trouble reading into his posts and getting at his intent. AND I shouldn't have to have a solid read on him yet or be pressured into a read on him because you think I should.
Tell me why you don't. Also, I have said this to Swords before. Regardless of his reaction being null or not, I felt his conclusions were misplaced in relation to that reaction.
Because it seems more stylistic than faking content, especially because he then went on to talk about other things like I said instead of lingering on LDR.
What does the bolded mean?
I think he has posted enough content to judge him. He already voted after a re-read. It seems he agreed to a point made by you, yet you haven't even asked him about that. Anyways, what did you think of his re-read and his vote on Mentos?
I absolutely agree, I've said he's posted a lot of content. I'm saying that
I don't have a read on him yet because I don't see his actions or intent as clearly scummy as you do. I don't know what your point is with the underlined, why should I have?
Vote on Mentos was reasons very similar to mine so I agree with it, his reread I feel like he addressed a lot of things that were already addressed including J being fluffy, nothing particularly original nor scummy.
July, you do know that scum know who is town, right? (Underlined) What is wrong with J being bothered by your town-lean on Swords?
Bolded, can you point out how exactly he wanted you to be scared of Swords? (In his own words, quote) Also, how is this a bad thing? How exactly did J try to keep Swords out of the TownRange?
That's not the point. J was saying that I shouldn't put him as a town lean because of Liar Game, as if putting him as a town lean meant I was giving him a free pass. He also said I was paranoid about Swords which isn't true, Circus reminded me that Swords was good in Liar Game as indy and I agreed so obviously I'm not going to write him off as town, but I'm not paranoid about him either, and I don't see any reason to be so far.
Here are the quotes:
D'aw you remembered.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Inception mafia was soooo much fun and now I can't be trusted with a Day Vig role because of it. However, July, can you tell me what exactly gives you a town-lean on Swords? I am curious like Circus because well...we all three found out how recently he can be haha. xD
I wanted a bit more of a healthier read from July about you. What she said as a reasoning for liking you is pretty generic, especially considering that she was being paranoid about you so why would a small thing like that give her a lean-town on you. Alright at the fact that it bugged you haha. The reason I asked that is because there is something about July's post that makes me curious about her because she seems a tad, cautious with her opinions on things at the moment. She seems more trying to justify a town-read on LDR rather than looking for scum and then her read on you is confusing me.
You should also check out Swords and Circus' reactions to J's questions here, because they expressed similar feelings that J reacted strangely to my town lean on Swords.
Why didn't you ask him about it? Also, did he exactly say you didn't do anything else besides that, or not? What do you think of the rest of J's play?
Underlined, I have interacted with LDR, WL, You, and Mentos. (I asked him about you)
Swords had already asked him about it.
The quote is posted up further, its part of the quote about my Swords town lean where he says it seems like I'm just justifying a town read on LDR.
I already stated what I think about J in my reads list:
"J has been another active player, but like Circus and Swords have pointed out he seems to be really concerned about my Swords read and I feel like he's been picking at little things and asking questions that aren't helping him scumhunt. I do like his input on WL however, I feel like "theatrical" is a good way to deem his style of play so far but that it isn't a red flag or indicative of alignment. Null leaning scum."
Bolded, I can understand you being confused as to why people would want to focus on the EE shot and all, but I wasn't focusing on LDR out of frustration. I was confused about what happened and I wanted answers. I don't see anything wrong with asking people about LDR. I was confused about them and I wanted others opinion on them.
I don't see that you gain any insight on LDR or on the players that you asked about them though. How did your questions about LDR help you establish a read on them? Is your read on them based on their shot, or also on their Mentos read/other actions?
That isn't what I am saying. I am saying you stated you didn't know where my head was, yet you didn't do anything to clear that up.
I was waiting on your response to me before I went any further with my opinions.
I don't understand why I was supposed to provoke you, and I didn't and couldn't have known that you were going to ask questions and give reads on WL, myself, and Swords until after I posted.
Underlined, that is different. WL stated he had no qualms with anyone, so LDR's question of "Who should die toDay then?" was odd in the sense of a re-direct, a nudge. It didn't seem like he was interested in what was in WL's head, but interested in WL changing direction with who he would want to die ToDay. You said you weren't sure what was in my head, so you asking me a question "Where is your head at?" wouldn't be a re-direct, it would be a question genuinely asking me what I'm thinking. See this is why I find your reasoning for your scumread on me odd. You find me scummy for not knowing where my head is at, and THEN you ask me for reads. This isn't genuine to me because you were eager to slap on a scumread on me without even asking me first to then come to a conclusion.
But why do I have to warn you before I pressure you? I'm getting information out of you now, and I did it while stating what I thought was off about you. I also got a response out of you. I'm curious, what was your read on me before my reads list? Your #262 is based completely off my reads list which is where I said that I had a scum lean on you, which is why your suspicions of me come across as OMGUS, especially since you've reacted really strongly against me for "slapping a scum read on you" even though I have you as a scum lean and my vote is on Mentos; you don't consider any intent I could have and just jump to I'm trying to get you lynched, and not that I'm trying to pressure you, get attention on you, keep an eye on you, etc.
No you haven't. You yourself said you were using 'moving play forward' as a heavy factor to determine alignments. That isn't intent. You aren't looking at J's intent. You are judging your read on J on one detail, and not his entire play. You are also using 'content' to determine your reads and it is glaringly obvious you aren't looking into intent because of that. (Such as your read on Circus moving discussion forward, anyone can do that)
I disagree, moving the game forward definitely does factor into someone's intent; are they trying to scumhunt or are they just posting crap that goes nowhere in order to look like they are contributing? And that's not all I'm looking at, but it's a factor in a game that's moving slowly like this one is and where there are few people actively contributing. Furthermore, I was looking at what else J has done and the intent behind his other posts, if I was focusing oin
just one detail like you said then he would be scum. Like I said, I liked what he said about WL's play being theatrical because it seemed like his intent was to help people make a better read on WL, rather than to exploit his style to say he was scummy.
Kk, but he's one of the lynch options for toDay, so how would you feel about him being lynched?
Underlined, it's obvious I wasn't trying to fake content. I did come up with something on LDR. I just don't have him as a priority because I have other scum reads I am confident in (WL and you) and we could use him to have two lynches a day. This doesn't mean he isn't a lynch candidate, it just means I'd rather lynch you two before him. Your reads come off as fake content.
I'm not going to argue over this because after that post you did give a read on LDR, but prior to that you seemed like you were gathering information on him and then just went nowhere with it.