Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well that's actually because Joker is the first DLC fighter out of 5. The number wasn't quite attached to the Season pass itself.
That's very good to know. I'm still not sure just how I'll approach the series yet, but this'll help me decide. I don't think the whole going back to the classics would be a problem, though. This is a girl who went to Zelda II after playing every other highly-appraised Zelda and, despite its controversial gameplay, loved it. I have an appreciation for older titles, really.
Hmm. I guess we'll have to wait until the next fighter.
For what?
To see if Challenger Pack 1 really means Joker is the first challenger or if it is just literally Challenger Pack 1. Just need a confirmation.
Got it.
Then there's no prob, it just depends what you feel like starting with. In DQ3 and 4 you can choose a female hero, that's something I like about those. 7 has a good class system like 6, and 8 doesnt quite have as much going, but it's a lot of other western people's starting point, and it isn't bad or anything. 9 is incredibly customizable, but that also makes it have a bit less personality because you create your own character. 10 is an mmo 
Honestly, I think the question is more like who hasn't?Zelda 2 is pretty unique, even to this day. The question is would you revisit zelda 1
I have a special place in my heart for Zelda II, but don't get me wrong! The original is also amazing in its own right and has earned its status as a legendary game.
It's definitely just for Joker as the first fighter pack. Since each DLC character is confirmed to come in a pack of their own already. Comes with music tracks and a stage so far as we know.
Alright, well in that case you like classics more than me cuz I dont like zelda 1 that muchHonestly, I think the question is more like who hasn't?
LMAO and it's confirmed early. I guess they were like, "Welp, might as well!" Very neat, though!
Honestly, while nothing is set in stone beyond the five, this is essentially why I have more hopes for Geno outside of the FP. I think he's just better suited for miscellaneous, stand-alone DLC than this large package of five. I can see Nintendo wanting to use FP to cater to a more worldwide, widespread approach + promotion, with Sakurai doing some other fan-favorite stuff on the side. It's why I highly doubt Geno will be in the FP, but my hopes haven't completely diminished.
They must've seen the Leak and went "Whelp, nothing we can do about it! Let's release the trailer." and boom you've yet again proved that you're a reliable leaker.
Honestly I still haven't seen an argument that more DLC is coming that wasn't, "of course there will be more DLC, look how well it's selling and how long the Switch will be around!" That said there are tons of games that sell well that don't just keep getting DLC, one of which was BotW, which got exactly the DLC they said it would get.
He'd at least come with Music, right?
There isn't any reason to assume it won't either
If he can't come with a stage, he has to come with music.
Personally, I just want Geno and then we can move up from there if at all.
I've finished the entire series from beginning to end. DQ11 is a fantastic starting point. That being said with Erdrick being high contested as the SE character I would honestly recommend trying 1 to 3. Only because of your Zelda 2 comment. If you cant get into DQ because of 1 and 2 THEN try 11.
Tbh this is basically my stance on the issue. People talk about how other people shouldn't be setting themselves for disappointment by hoping for one character but then are very sure that a Season 2 of DLC is going to happen when we literally have nothing pointing towards that. I think if anything the smart thing is to expect there not to be a second wave of DLC and be pleasantly surprised if there is. I've seen too many instances in games like Mortal Kombat where people were banking on an additional DLC pack when none was announced and were met with absolutely nothing.
There isn't anything pointing to it not happening either
I mean, yeah. Only the precedence that they didn't do one last time. But that's why I bring up the "Don't bank on one character" mindset. It's the same basic idea of not making assumptions about things you don't have concrete evidence for.
True. According to the recent article I posted the link to, I think more DLC after wave 1/season 1, even if it's not a season, is likely, though
Pinocchio
That's within the realm of reason, more or less.
To be fair, some fake leakers that end up convincing people is because they have access to 'some' information and use it to their advantage.
Nothing wrong with still being skeptical. I like Polar, but ever since Grinch Leak I’ve had little reason to put 100% faith in somone.
It's funny you said take with salt, it took me a sec to wrap my head back around 'a grain of salt' because of people talking about being salty so much
When I saw the Shovel Knight AT, I was more or less "oof". Did I cry? Get angered? Hit something, shook my fist and say "how dare you"? No, I took it calmly and with humility (although I've never been particularly fussy about Smash reveals).
Yeah. Plus Jon Cartwright did post otters, when that happens Directs usually aren't too far off.
I think the important difference to note between Polar and other leakers is that he's not going on a bunch of different sites and social media and trying to get his name out there like others who will remain nameless. Not sure how new you are to these threads but what he was predominately doing for a long time was trying to give this thread any information he could regarding Geno possibly being in smash. That's literally it. He's not like any number of leakers out there trying to get some hot scoops and leaks for attention. I understand being skeptical, but Polar hasn't given anyone reason to think he's being deceitful or attention *****-y in the slightest. I find this sudden questioning of his legitimacy by people to be kind of weird tbh. Is it a coincidence that this is happening right after he corrected the misinformation of height's importance in character data?
That's not something I care about when keeping up with Vergeben. It's just I'm tired of reading his stuff only to find out he is saying nothing. Same with Hitagi. At this point, I just keep up with PapaGenos, who breaks the important **** down for me when it's available rather than keeping up with it myself.
Yeah. And at the rate he claims Minecraft stuff might happen, he's obviously unsure about it. Even his day one Ender Dragon boss DLC ticket was wasted. Also, posting in Gamefaqs like he does is a waste of time, energy and sanity.
PolarPanda
Quick Question if you don't mind, Is there any evidence that the Square rep will be revealed next or is it all just assumptions?
Sometimes bias entices gullibility. That's all I'll say.
What bias, m8? I'm just some random person who joined the forums this summer and have been in this thread since then. I'm just pointing out that from what I've observed nothing thus far that
PolarPanda
has done has been sketch so I don't really understand where the specific skepticism towards him is cropping up from. Also, bias goes both ways. It can also entice unwarranted criticism and accusations if someone is saying things you don't necessarily agree with.