Eh, it's more or less like "oh neat, another martial artist human" (Terry), "oh neat, another weapon-user/FE character" (Byleth) when you don't recognize or care about them. I guess what I'm asking for is more unique characters, and in a sea of tons of humans who just "use weapon" or "use gimmick", a lot of them are 1-dimensional.
For the record, I am *NOT* complaining about how they play, just talking about that "wow" factor in seeing a character for the first time. In seeing Geno, you see a doll possessed by a spirit who uses bullets that are fired from his fingers. He also can use magic, literally transform his arms into better guns/other weaponry (like rocket punches), or transform his ENTIRE BEING INTO A MOTHER !@#$ING CANNON. Seeing that kind of character for the first time, you think "WOW, that's something really unique! I wanna know more!" over someone like Byleth who is literally "FE character who uses weapons", which describes every FE character/half of Robin and Corrin, or "human who does martial arts", which is now Ryu, Ken, and Terry. Ganondorf actually decently unique, using punches, a big ****-off sword, and dark magic. Banjo's literally a bear who uses a BIRD AS WEAPONRY (whether that's spitting/pooping eggs or literally using the bird as a blunt weapon).
It's not a major argument for sure, but it's still a point in having characters that bring attention to them to make them as appealing as possible to those who have no idea who they are. As much as I don't want Sora in the game, I can't help but say he'd be in a similar case (albeit nowhere near as close as Geno) of being unique. Yeah he's got a "sword" but he also uses magic, summons, and a slew of other things (though it'd depend on how Sakurai designed him). MC might be super popular but he's basically "male Metroid (Samus) with more firepower and less powers".
Idk, it might be worth them looking into, especially if they bring back any other characters from long ago/obscurity, especially if they're looking at stuff like Blazblue or Touhou characters (vast majority of Western gamers have never even heard of those series): Consider picking the unique ones that would make people really like them, so you don't have another Byleth or even Terry on your hands.
PS: Even some characters I want go against this paragraph, and that's totally okay. Lloyd would be cool and play well, but he'd be "just another human swordsman", just with two swords instead of one. Phoenix Wright would be "some lawyer human", Advance Wars rep would be "some military humans". It's totally fine to want non-unique characters, I just wish they'd pick a few more unique ones to get people hooked on them even if they have no idea who they are, especially if they aren't frequently requested, are very old, or obscure as heck.
...
Are we really saying that being human or humanoid is something to complain about in terms of uniqueness?
Jesus, we really are spoiled, aren't we?
Now maybe I'M the one in the wrong here, but I see each character as a unique character, even echoes. I think the only exception would be Daisy as, unless something has changed, she is literally Peach in all forms of gameplay outside of design. Literally she is only different in aesthetics.
I am someone who argues that Lucina is a completely unique character to Marth even though very little was done to change her, because what changes were done make her gameplay different. I guess I just have lower standards for something being considered unique or different...or, you know, most of the Smash fandom likes to overly generalize things.
Fun opinion: Gameplay matters more than aesthetics. It doesn't matter if Geno gets in if you don't enjoy playing him. Sure, we may all freak out for a long ass time, but what about once we get our hands on him? What happens if you don't like how plays on a fundamental level? Will you continue to play as a character you dislike playing just because they happen to be a character you like aesthetically?
Thus, to me, I couldn't give a rat's ass who we get overall. I don't care if we get more Fire Emblem or more swordfighters or maybe other shill picks like Pokemon from Sword and Shield, because their gameplay and unique mechanics means more to me than the character. At early face value I was let down a small but by Byleth, but now I can't wait to drag people into the depths of the blast zone just because they wanted to spike me and I felt like recovering.
Also, anything can be made to be like something else when you generalize it enough. It's just like anything can be meaningful if you force it to be.
Brad Pitt is just 'another rich guy.'
The most delectable meal at a 6-Star restaurant is 'just a plate of food.'
The Joker is 'just another comic book villain.'
Smashboards is 'just another website on the internet.'
Smash Ultimate is 'just another video game.'
Do you see the problem with this mentality? You are throwing away all nuance with a blanket statement to make it fit a narrative. Clearly, there is more to it than what you are trying to let on, but literally anything can be dumbed down to the biggest generalization...but I'm sure you understand the folly in such an action.
You can not want a character, and the reason doesn't have to be objectively sound as it's about how you feel, but this is a bit much.
Something something 'Don't judge a book by it's cover.' something something 'More to them than meets the eye...' something something 'Walk a mile in their shoes.' something something I think my point has been made. If you write off a new character just based on their first presentation and never give them a chance you are not giving the character nor yourself a fair chance.