What's the difference between deserving and worth?
Worth may have been the wrong word, but in the sense that I was using it, when I talk about "deserving", I talk about the character's importance to the series they come from, which Geno lacks. He's only important for one game only in a series with 250+ games and is not even owned by Nintendo.
When I talk about "worth", I talk about what makes the character worth adding to Smash. Being deserving ties into worth, but it's not the only contribution. With Geno's deserving level being quite low, that's already a down spike for worth. His only saving grace in the worth department is that he is on the unique side (Smash doesn't have any living dolls with weapons) and has a fanbase, no matter how much of a vocal minority or bandwagoning it is.
It's very comparable to Dunsparce, who receieved a bandwagoning fanbase earlier this year. Both characters don't deserve it due to being extremely minor to their respective series, and yet, both characters would be interestingly different compared to the rest of the cast.
There are times though where a character is deserving, but has little worth. Best example? Tingle.
He is a recurring Zelda character that has his own
spin-off titles. This pretty much puts him above any other recurring Zelda character that isn't a part of the Triforce Trio. However, his worth is low due to having a stark hatebase within the States, and a meager fanbase within Japan and Europe (they don't hate him, but he's not overly loved from what people have gathered).
Anytime one company uses another company's property it is a big deal. Even within the same company, you have different subsidiaries that require legal, contractual approval. When you have a third party company that is already known for being tightwads, then yes, it just might be a big deal in this context.
I am well aware of that. I'm merely questioning the idea that there would have been legal issues in getting permission for something as insignificant as a
Sticker, when a different licensed cameo had been made before.