HipsterKid
Smash Ace
Very well put Kenji.
I was going to say the same thing myself.
I was going to say the same thing myself.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Who are you to decide what is worth speculating and what isn't?Seriously though. This isn't even worth 'speculating'. It's been confirmed, and she's in a Pokeball..
I'm sayin because it's stupid and worthless. She will never be a playable character now because she is in a Pokeball, it's really that simple.Who are you to decide what is worth speculating and what isn't?
Seriously, if you're not interested in speculating about Gardevoir then please go to a thread that's purpose isn't speculating about Gardevoir. It's really that simple.
Again, what gives you the right to decide if it's stupid and worthless, even if it is highly unlikely that she will become a playable character?I'm sayin because it's stupid and worthless. She will never be a playable character now because she is in a Pokeball, it's really that simple.
Your statement is true in the sense that OUR single line of history can never be alternate, but our line of history could be a stem, or subset, coming out from changes in another line's history, or line. Kind of like a "multi-verse", or "infinite parallel universes" theory kind of thing.People also like to discuss alternative history, which could never possibly happen because history already happened, yet who are you to say that they can't.
KK.And don't bring up the impossible versus highly improbable debate again....
Exactly that.Again, what gives you the right to decide if it's stupid and worthless, even if it is highly unlikely that she will become a playable character?
Arguably spending time playing video games is just as worthless, yet people like to do it, who are you to tell them that they can't just because you think it's worthless.
People also like to discuss alternative history, which could never possibly happen because history already happened, yet who are you to say that they can't.
You only ultimately have control over yourself, so why waste your life spoiling people's fun, something which doesn't make anyone happy, so probably far more worthless then what if for something that could've happened, or is unlikely to happen.
And don't bring up the impossible versus highly improbable debate again....
Nothing is pointless if enjoyed, enjoyment is a point in and of itself, irregardless of any status of the activity involved.Exactly that.
That isn't the same, I'm talking about something that's pointless to talk about because it's already been proven otherwise.
Again, that's not what I'm talking about, there's a difference of talking about what could have happened and what could and might happen.
Why waste your life spoiling for people it who enjoy it?Lol wtf are you talking about? You're making it sound way different than it already is. Why waste life trying to talk about something that won't happen?
Again, I point to the entire debate above, where it was established that there is no proof that a pokeball is deconfirmation, and only precedent says this which is not an absolute rule of the system, equating to a low chance, not impossibility (aka deconfirmation).I just came in and said she's a Pokeball and deconfirmed, and it's stupid to think that she'll still be a playable character.
But see the thing is, you don't do it because you enjoy it, you do it because you want Gardevoir in the game and you want to prove others wrong.Nothing is pointless if enjoyed, enjoyment is a point in and of itself, irregardless of any status of the activity involved.
Why waste your life spoiling for people it who enjoy it?
As long as it's not illegal there really is no point in spoiling people's fun.
Sure, it's not gonna happen in all probability, but if they like it, why should you care, and why waste your life, not even having your own fun, but spoiling other peoples' fun?
Again, I point to the entire debate above, where it was established that there is no proof that a pokeball is deconfirmation, and only precedent says this which is not an absolute rule of the system, equating to a low chance, not impossibility (aka deconfirmation).
Again, do not bring that debate up again, it has been positively discussed to death, unless you have an official statement equating deconfirmations and being a pokeball just drop it.
Or the guy with the sick fetish for Pokemon. (The first post)Only adumbrodeus seems to think Garde is still playable material.
Lol. yeah, shows how much you've been reading.But see the thing is, you don't do it because you enjoy it, you do it because you want Gardevoir in the game and you want to prove others wrong.
Yes, but I'm enjoying it, something you don't seem to be, you just seem to be frustrated.I waste life? I don't see where you come up with this, it's 10pm weekday, I'm multi tasking with Myspace and instant messangers and listening to music, anything you do can be a waste of life, you're posting just as much as me. As long as it's not illegal? There's no point in spoiling anyone elses fun period with your logic.
Well, if you do, then have fun, but then we'd just have to ignore you so it would become pointless in order to protect our fun, well not really mine, but other people's.What if I took "joy" into debating about something with a bunch of brick walls?
Actually those (and others, such as lack of precedent) are why the chance is very low. You don't have to convince me of this, I already know and did since the pokeball was revealed in the demo.Pokeball is deconfirmation of a playable character. Why would Sakurai do that? It minus' value and diversity. Don't bring the debate of why Gardevoir is deconfirmed? Why? Do you realize it's true and you don't want to talk about it?
Let me qualify that, there are others, but nobody thinks she will actually appear in brawl.Only adumbrodeus seems to think Garde is still playable material.
instead of going through all of this why dont you say"I dont think gardevoir will be playable, because of the pokebal treatment, her/its chances are almost nothing"?Lol. yeah, shows how much you've been reading.
Gardevoir is an interesting character but nowhere near the top of my list, plus from almost the beginning I qualified my statement as saying that she would not be in, unless by some miracle her one in a million chance came up.
How do you make the jump from "she has an enormously low chance of being in" to "she's gonna be in", because that's what you straw-manned me as.
Yes, but I'm enjoying it, something you don't seem to be, you just seem to be frustrated.
As far as illegal, generally because them doing it spoils either your time or somebody else's time. I'm sure you can derive my stance on victimless crimes from this.
But you're the one who started calling what people did pointless, my only point here is that you're wrong, it's not pointless if people enjoy it.
Well, if you do, then have fun, but then we'd just have to ignore you so it would become pointless in order to protect our fun, well not really mine, but other people's.
Actually those (and others, such as lack of precedent) are why the chance is very low. You don't have to convince me of this, I already know and did since the pokeball was revealed in the demo.
That said, I have already discussed this to death as have others. If you can bring some new information to the table, then fine, I'll gladly continue, at this point however, every possible argument has been rehashed countless times and still nobody has come up with a firm logical argument as to why pokeballs are deconfirmation.
They came up with plenty of firm logical arguments why a character in a pokeball is unlikely to appear (as a pc) in the game, but nothing that proves that it makes appearance impossible as playable character.
So again, I'll respond if you bring up something that is new and relevant, look at the rest of the thread to see what was already discussed. Until then, I chose not to respond to any points in regards to this particular tangent.
Let me qualify that, there are others, but nobody thinks she will actually appear in brawl.
We just recognize that pokeball=deconfirmation preconception is not grounded in any official statements so there is a very very slim chance she will be a pc.
Because it's not almost nothing. It IS nothing.instead of going through all of this why dont you say"I dont think gardevoir will be playable, because of the pokebal treatment, her/its chances are almost nothing"?
I didn't mean you litterally, I meant it as the general Gardevoir fanboys.Lol. yeah, shows how much you've been reading.
Gardevoir is an interesting character but nowhere near the top of my list, plus from almost the beginning I qualified my statement as saying that she would not be in, unless by some miracle her one in a million chance came up.
How do you make the jump from "she has an enormously low chance of being in" to "she's gonna be in", because that's what you straw-manned me as.
Yes, but I'm enjoying it, something you don't seem to be, you just seem to be frustrated.
As far as illegal, generally because them doing it spoils either your time or somebody else's time. I'm sure you can derive my stance on victimless crimes from this.
But you're the one who started calling what people did pointless, my only point here is that you're wrong, it's not pointless if people enjoy it.
Well, if you do, then have fun, but then we'd just have to ignore you so it would become pointless in order to protect our fun, well not really mine, but other people's.
They came up with plenty of firm logical arguments why a character in a pokeball is unlikely to appear (as a pc) in the game, but nothing that proves that it makes appearance impossible as playable character.