Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap7m1CYzS6A&feature=relatedim not scum
somebody save me
Man dat ninja.Honest opinions, honest opinions.
Soup wanna stay with me for a bit? I wanna bounce off some idea with someone.
Not very. A lot of it is from early play but the play lately has been weak and I've been mulling it all day.And Soup, how confident are you on Inferno being town?
its hard dude. i feel like the majority of my **** has been ignored, overlooked, or just Scumm'd up by Xonar/Axel infestation. and then people like RR have been like, "aight i can see that i guess sure maybe" and then people like Felipe are like "derp derp my vote goes wherever u two want me to put it dont really got nuthin to say" etc. etc.Both of you piss me off, and yes, I'm regarding Axel and Omni.
Omni, you're doing a whole lot of grasping at straws, with nearly everything.
I don't understand the need, I don't understand why you need to bring up incessant points such as "everyone voting me is a sheep" or "you don't want bronar/felipe/axel" leading the game do you becair lylo Ill tell you I told you so" or some **** like that.
If you're actually town omni, cut the drama and be more productive, I don't want to see this thread clogged with your AtE and Axel's sudden bullheaded approach to everything.
wtfamireading.jpgXonar said:I know you, Ryker. You play to survive, at the extent of others. You're detrimental. Killing you is the best way for me to survive, and/or to keep Axel alive. And that's assuming you're town.
Which I don't. You're scum. And if you're scum, you're going to be a pain in the *** for the entire town. Especially me/Axel, if you survive today by some miracle and get that fake guilty on me/Axel. Not letting you.
Town wouldn't do what? Push my lynch choice? Yes I would and yes I did. Doesn't matter if you disagree with me. I told you in the very post that I claimed it was a gambit not to look into that fact. I predicted you and Inferno would be the ones to mention it. I showed you earlier how you were wrong, and you accepted it. So tell me what has changed.Now Axel, he dies.
The gambit is bad from a town perspective. Tried to push their own personal pick and claim that they would have pushed to a lynch if they could. Off lying about being the cop, figure this. Town wouldn't do this.
Why the heck do people keep assuming Ryker is town. He isn't town my friend. People may dislike my ability to read into this, but it's not my fault you guys are so slow. The end of this day is irking me because scum is flailing so hard, and while I've shown my points with logic and reason, people are still being so slow. As I said I believe this is the climax and scum have no choice but to fight for keeping Omni alive at this point. The fact that you're making this 180 all the sudden says something. Now then the "knowing and investigative would have most likely CC'd him" was addressed in #1374. Instead of ignoring my previous responses in order to fit your case, you need to address them and show how they were wrong. Furthermore, to say that I knew an investigative Role would likely CC is wrong. I explained why I didn't this was likely at all. You know there's something here that I just realized. How would I know an investigative would have investigated GORDITO? Ryker even claimed that his investigation was random, so there is no way I would know there would be a likely CC.He would have known an investigative would have most likely CC' him if he pushed it that far and Ryker wasn't inactive enough.
You keep saying this but have yet to show what I have ignored. Show me everything I have ignored and selectively answered. You even dropped this case after I disproved it (#1283). This leads me to believe that you're bringing it up again simply to add substance to your case.From his bad gambit he moved to ignore, and continues to do so, and only answer questions and comments when he chooses to with a pick and choose kind of style.
-If I wanted to push it through to the hilt, I would have. The fact that I retracted after a shift in reads shows that was not my intention. As I said before, during my initial push on Gord I very much did believe him to be scum. I would have lynched him. Of course I would have loved for him to actually respond and I'm certain no one would have just blindly lynched him without getting his response. For my gambit to be legit I had to make it believable.Axel is scum from his behavior shortly before and all of it after I replaced into the game.
His claim is scummy as **** and he was pushing it through to the hilt.
The way he has, and continues to ignore everyone until confronted in a way he can't avoid.
The way he tries to force the one motive down everyone's throat without any reason for me to believe him.
That DISGUSTING strawman to my recent post.
The way he's trying to hammer home a lynch. That unvote offer with Acrostic was almost certainly so he could turn around and hammer.
I'm gonna murder this guy.
He's saying he was completely willing to go all the way with that claimed guilty. He already had Gorf at L-2 and was pushing for more votes. Literally, the first thing I got from anyone was "feel free to put Gorf at L-1."
He also insinuates that people are scummy for not joining the wagon while conveniently ignoring the fact that if he really were town, scum would be licking their chops at a shot at a mislynch followed by another mislynch.
Xonar, seriously, from where does the town read stem?
The bolded is quite literally all you responded to.lol Ryker that doesn't matter. I'm telling you guys that I would have because that's just how I am. As scum I could have easily just not have told you that I wouldn't have stopped the lynch.
Anywho. If Kooz is serious about where he stands now, I'm pretty sure this is the climax of things. After Omni's flip, Bronar and I will probably be getting townie points. Ryker will have no choice but to kill one of us. From there, the other will be able to take them out without the support of Omni.
No, but that has reasons.Xonar did you speak to your partner about your plan to CC Ryker before actually doing so>
wtfamireading.jpg
I may be interpreting this wrong but right now it reads all sorts of wrong.
But Ryker is far from wrong when saying something doesn't add up. It being late, I left Axel's claim out of the equation. That and fear of Ryker made the whole thing a mess. Here are some quotes;Looking at these odds, I know it is better to lynch Gorf. The problem is, that you, Ryker, are an unbelievable survivalist who will sacrifice multiple towns-folks to survive.
As town vanilla: conjure guilty, survive as Rykertown, sacrifice Axel/Brosuke.
As town cop: get guilty, push it, survive as Rykertown (unlikely, I am town, I feel Axel is town too)
As town cop: get innocent, conjure guilty, survive as Rykertown, sacrifice Axel/Brosuke.
As scum: conjure guilty, survive as Rykerscum, win game.
I don't trust you regardless of your town/scum-being with the position you're in now.
Except he didn't. Didn't he call it off before a lynch happened? Yes, I do agree that it went on too long, but through to the hilt is a hyperbole. Honestly, the only way this could've really been used to bait a CC is if he assumed I was cop and felt confident on Omni or something? Nobody in the game would've copped Gorf tbh.His claim is scummy as **** and he was pushing it through to the hilt
I haven't seen this happen, and I've dug a bit. Links?The way he has, and continues to ignore everyone until confronted in a way he can't avoid.
You mean the motive behind his claim? If so, isn't that the logical thing to do? Convince other people that your motive is pure?The way he tries to force the one motive down everyone's throat without any reason for me to believe him.
Point.That DISGUSTING strawman to my recent post.
Speculation is a point now?The way he's trying to hammer home a lynch. That unvote offer with Acrostic was almost certainly so he could turn around and hammer.
He was going to lynch a townie off of his claim and then walk for it because only now is he receiving any sort of attention in no small part due to two replacements. There is SO MUCH that could go wrong from a townie's perspective. There's still things that could go wrong from a scum's perspective, but the fact that he isn't dead yet and was CCed is a credit to how safe the claim was.Except he didn't. Didn't he call it off before a lynch happened? Yes, I do agree that it went on too long, but through to the hilt is a hyperbole. Honestly, the only way this could've really been used to bait a CC is if he assumed I was cop and felt confident on Omni or something? Nobody in the game would've copped Gorf tbh.
Look at the call-outs. All of them. First on his claim and then Omni wanting information from him. IIRC, I also tried getting him to answer things while we were going back and forth, but he's selective in what he responds to.I haven't seen this happen, and I've dug a bit. Links?
And instead of addressing the reasoning of my more plausible solution, he just insists that I'm wrong and he's right.You mean the motive behind his claim? If so, isn't that the logical thing to do? Convince other people that your motive is pure?
Alone no. With the information present, it's a reasonable assumption. Look at how he's behaving with this lynch. He's tried HARD to hammer it through before the backlash got out. Do you seriously think my speculation is unfounded. I CERTAINLY don't trust the number two in line for a lynch with the hammer and I think it's pretty ridiculous to think he should be allowed to hold it on good faith given his recent history.Speculation is a point now?
YoooooooomiiiiiiiAlright I'll be in this game thread til deadline, but Ryker just decided to claim all my time. Will do this after school. (2-3 hours?)
- His claim was very safe, and even withstood a 'counterclaim'He was going to lynch a townie off of his claim and then walk for it because only now is he receiving any sort of attention in no small part due to two replacements. There is SO MUCH that could go wrong from a townie's perspective. There's still things that could go wrong from a scum's perspective, but the fact that he isn't dead yet and was CCed is a credit to how safe the claim was.
If he would've been satisfied he would've dropped it, like he did. If the gambit showed that Gorf is scum, then he would've pushed it through.Axel said:As I said before, during my initial push on Gord I very much did believe him to be scum. I would have lynched him. Of course I would have loved for him to actually respond and I'm certain no one would have just blindly lynched him without getting his response. For my gambit to be legit I had to make it believable.
Denying information about his claim once again had to be done to prevent counterclaiming. It was necessary for the gambit. If you've got specific examples that he left unanswered forever then go ahead and find em.Look at the call-outs. All of them. First on his claim and then Omni wanting information from him. IIRC, I also tried getting him to answer things while we were going back and forth, but he's selective in what he responds to.
Your reasoning:And instead of addressing the reasoning of my more plausible solution, he just insists that I'm wrong and he's right.
Alright. You don't trust him, I do. Agree to disagree here.Alone no. With the information present, it's a reasonable assumption. Look at how he's behaving with this lynch. He's tried HARD to hammer it through before the backlash got out. Do you seriously think my speculation is unfounded. I CERTAINLY don't trust the number two in line for a lynch with the hammer and I think it's pretty ridiculous to think he should be allowed to hold it on good faith given his recent history.
It' the fact you tried to lie your way into your personal lynch. Even knowing you could out the cop.Town wouldn't do what? Push my lynch choice? Yes I would and yes I did. Doesn't matter if you disagree with me. I told you in the very post that I claimed it was a gambit not to look into that fact. I predicted you and Inferno would be the ones to mention it. I showed you earlier how you were wrong, and you accepted it. So tell me what has changed.
Doesn't disprove intent that he was whiling to despite the fact Gorf didn't get lynched.Though he didn't.
Good example.a verdict consist of labeling someone as scum or town. at the time, did not do so. saying J is "legit" does not mean he is town.
- His scumpicks are easy. Day 1 he started on Red Ryu who just gambitted. Then he went on me who opened with a contradictorily post. Then he went on WL who was main flavor.then what do you consider significant at that point in the game, Brosuke? i made stances.
Going on in D2 this was his list. I got on his mistrust on Chaco before (1) (note his bad reasoning on why not to trust chaco as to defend the dumbest point ever)Don't trust Axel's slot at the moment. Don't trust Chaco. Don't trust you.
Doesn't disprove intent that he was whiling to despite the fact Gorf didn't get lynched.
get it 10char?His reasoning:
- He thought Gorf was suspicious D1
- He fakeclaimed to push a lynch on a scummy player
- He wanted to get reads on the entire cast on it and Gorf
- He intended to revoke his claim should Gorf turn out to be town, or push it through should he not be
- He only admitted it because Ryker claimed
Mhm can we leave it at that then? I know in which direction I'm going to look but speculating on a flip that hasn't been given is wasting time. If you want me to talk about specific flip/people combos, go ahead and ask, but going over every single one is a draaaag.Coo' agree with most of this.