Hi guys, i'm late to the party, catching up and quoting as i read.
brosuke said:
@ Anyone good:
Information on playstyles / level of these four?
9. July [0]
10. Rajam [0]
11. Circus [0]
12. Dark_Horse [0]
July is an analytical player who will write you a case even if you ask her for a read, she's fairly good at hiding her alignment but also town-telling easily, a player to watch out for indeed.
Rajam is okay, he's quiet but from his play i've seen from him he plays his role fairly well, he's a backstage player, mild caution to watch out for.
Circus is an overall good player, he's someone to watch out for certainly, i don't have an exact method of reading him so just read his content as whatever he puts out there.
DH tends to get upset easily and is melodramatic about things he is concerned or into, he tends to make really long juvenile posts that could either flop or actually have reason, finding the latter between him being town and scum is usually between his actions.
Hipster Samurai said:
You shouldn't announce who you uncap yet btw. The other one will just lose his reason to play if you let him know that he's going to die anyway. Also, we should deffo be uncapped, not kuz
Brosuke said:
Or they should just prove that they are worth the survival
that.
Dark Horse said:
Interesting.
This is your retaliation to the other person being uncapped. It's not really a defense, it's more like a threat.
"Hey guys, don't uncap kuz or i'll give up"
Incap: hipsters
I read it more like HSamurai just making a null statement for no reason, but i agree with your logic here.
th3kuzinator said:
That was a serious vote btw. I'm just figuring out if I want them to die by vote or by incap.
th3kuzinator said:
I'm running the numbers right now to see whether having one kill or two kills this phase would be better.
You sure show confidence that you won't be incapped or voted, and i would say one kill toDay is better than two kills.
scum have no nightkills, they both select a cap target independently and we vote who we let survive
Alright, thanks for that quick clarification, i didn't read the rules.
No we can't.
Scum uncaps two different people (if they incap the same person, that person just dies). Whichever player receives the most amount of uncap votes will survive when the day phases ends. In addition to this death, our lynch is a second kill.
Strictly speaking probabilities keeping this game's numbers even will enhance town's win percentage quite a bit. This means starting each phase with an even number. Lynching someone other than Gheb and letting the slot die would give us 11 the next day while just lynching Gheb would give us 12. This doesn't have to be done this day phase but sometime before endgame to even out the numbers woul be beneficial.
Personally, I'd love to only lynch Samurai this phase and stick to two every other (unless we have cop results on an incap target or something).
I agree with this post.
Dark Horse said:
One thing that bugs me about lynching and killing the same person is that it allows town to play exactly to what one of the scum team wants, as the scum's cap pretty much means that a scumteam wants them dead.
Brosuke, why would you want a sample mafia role pm?
Capping and voting will become interesting and more useful come later game, especially with scum flips and results from the comparison cop, i think we shouldn't worry about the mechanic and the risk of both right now, just let the game play to itself and discuss how we are going to use it.
that said, (up to this point) i like Kuz and i don't like HSamurai, i would probably be putitng my incap vote on HSamurai if i didn't show up so late.
Circus said:
So far, the only thing that could have informed the incap targets we're seeing toDay is player reputation. One scum team incap'd Kuz because they feel threatened by him, regardless of his alignment. The other scum team did the same to HipSam for the same reason. It doesn't matter if our interests and one scum team's interests temporarily overlap, as long as it nets us dead scum.
Is this a solid statement or just a mere guess because of the targets? does the Incap targets make you biased towards one side or the other? possibility of one being scum? both town?
th3kuzinator said:
And if Soup modkills himself then we just helped scum (regardless of alignment; everyone would want soup dead).
very funny Kuz.
circus said:
And we "help" scum even more if the incap'd player who dies is town and we mislynch. Obviously we're going to try not to kill any townies. My only point is that, in a game like this, "helping scum" is not always the same as "hurting town." By lynching any scum at all, we're naturally helping ourselves and the other scum faction. Just because one scum team wants it doesn't necessarily mean it's something we don't want.
Hm, ok, i see what you're saying here.
Gorf said:
I agree with Gorf here, this is a lot of WIFOM that is making my head hurt.
Ryker said:
The only time I would NOT uncap is if the numbers line up in a MyLo situation. It's infinitely better to get the information out there and give up the gain from flips later on when there's more for you to pull from.
I find your argument situational rather than definite truth.
Ryker, you're doing a lot of ranting and raving over a mechanical situation, wouldn't you say to just ignore it for the time being and focus on the bigger stuff such as lynching scum? do you find you will use incaps as a benefit to vote/see scum?
One of the people who is "INcapped".
Why would we only lynch them Joey? Why would we not let them die AND go elsewhere? Show your logical processes.
I thought the deal was we can also lynch and incap a person, the person who is uncapped lives etc.
So i think Ryker is town, he seems to be set on his ways and his arrogance is quite a charm but none the less his motives are townie for the sake of being townie, that is until i get to that Kuz v Ryker thing i skimmed.
mmm yes i agree and the more we talk about it the more i want to ignore that wifom and just try to find scum normally, i find all of that "what if" bull, just that, bull.
Early interaction with Ryker v. Kuz seems pointless as it's just talk about numbers and mechanics, in fact the whole thing is just a giant ego-fest of 'I am right, you are wrong.'
circus said:
You. In every scenario, including Kuz or HipSam.
Intredasting.jpg
I would say i wouldn't shoot either, right now both of them are just flopping egos and being cutthroat with every argument against each other, not once have i seen in this little fight one of them actually agree with a statement but just refute and re-direct it back.
ugly indeed, but what makes you lean Ryker at this point? too leading? too dramatic? talk to me bby.
Gorf said:
As far as alignment, I get a clash-of-heads read. It helps with a town read on you, cuz I'm sure scumRyker wouldn't waste time knitpicking something like that.
I thought about this too.
HSamurai said:
If it was just between killing one of you two? Then Kuz. You seem to have immediately came into the game to make connections by asking clear cut questions. Kuzi hasn't done this. Instead he just decided that we're scum based off of one post, which he didn't even explain. No matter how you interpret our 12, it is a pretty weak reason to find us scummy. Also, Kuzi is challenging you, but he would do that as scum anyways, especially given the situation he's in, so that's a null point.
I agree on the weak reason to find someone scummy, but wouldn't you say it's also a way to start a game/start discussion, you can look at it like that but you can also look the positives and townie motive of it, i personally thought your 12 was scummy too.
I like Kuz more in Kuz v Ryker.
I would have to disagree with you.
Kuz is def. reading town.
I would have to disagree with you.
Hsamurai said:
How did you guys (Joey / Gord) come to these reads already?
Not that hard, i've already got plenty.
th3kuzinator said:
Ryker is turning everything into ultimatums and that his questions have no point to then. They're just whimsical attempts to give the appearance of producing content.
But instead you're a fan of his clear cut questions. Talk about superficial reasoning.
You guys should kiss and make up already, i can't seem to agree with either of you because you just want to dis-credit their play, both of your points don't mean anything unless you can prove it, and right now it's just talking out of your ***.
HSamurai, clarify your read on Kuz, you've already put Ryker on a pedastal enuogh.
KevMo's entrance is okay, i didn't see brosuke that way but W/E
KevinM said:
I don't have to comment on two brash people throwing out null tells and WIFOMy thoughts left and right when you guys are not making any progress on the game at hand and instead having an ego war.
I read your stuff and got what I thought was necessary from it, I don't feel the need to comment on it currently.
Brosuke has however struck me on an entirely different chord, why are you so quick to dismiss it ... scum got your tongue?
I like KevinM.
Ryker said:
You're mad I'm on your scummate.
Brash, i find Gorf playing more Null than leaning to the other side, why the quick call-out besides them being transparent??
I would've thought that Gorf wouldn't sit there with his finger up his bum. Doesn't match up with the Gorf I know. Your answer was pretty inconsequential other than as something to look back at if you contradict it without good reason.
Hm, yeah i agree Gorf is playing Null but once again, why is he sided with Kuz? can he be solo scum?
Dislike KevMo's need to insist on standing in the back of the class talking with the emo kid rather than give me the stances I want on the people I want to know about. His "draft a strong late game" really is no excuse not to give me them at all.
I didn't mind it, as long as he's making sense and i agree with his effort/find it townie he can play that role all he wants.
Originally Posted by Joey
Why did you rush this? >> '
Mostly to assure I got the right answer, partly cuz I wanted to imitate Ryker.
>Intimidate Ryker
>2011
th3kuzinator said:
Ryker flailing. Ryker case bad. Gorf town. Samurai scum.
i agree with all of this.
HSamurai said:
My post was not meant to be a threat at all. It was actually meant to be the opposite of it but back then I had not realized that the two mafia parties can incap each other. It's not mentioned in the rules and it doesn't make sense in context with the original set-ups [L4S only had one mafia faction and mafia can't kill each other in F & E] so I wrote under the assumption that Kuz and us are both confirmed town - imagine my surprise when I saw people were seriously considering voting me! Since there were no clear rules about inacpping and uncapping in the OP I thought he'd just use the standard F & E game plan with L4S mechanics.
Sounds like a lot of hublah.
I'm not impressed.
Unvote Vote July
Bold play, sell me on it.
July said:
That distinction probably affects what you mean in the bolded but whatever, I'll address it anyways. If I came in and you were defending yourself but also asking people for their opinions or giving your thoughts on something like Ryker v. Kuz then I wouldn't have a problem with you. My problem is that you didn't make any effort to comment on anything going on in the thread that didn't deal with survival between you and Kuz.
July seems to be putting up the better argument here.
Kuz v Ryker was dumb, leaning Ryker being town for the moment despite being obnoxious, Kuz needs to start doing something.
Gorf is null-lean town.
July is town, HSamurai still looks like scum to me.
DH idk
KevMo is cool for now.
incap: HSamurai