Nothing inspired the vote, I just wanted to contribute to the wagon because it looked like it was going to get the most momentum and I thought I may as well help Politoed out with his wagon. The question was unrelated to voting him, and voting him was unrelated to having any read on him. I do believe I have already answered this question.
Ok.
Since when? You noted the same thing (I'm assuming this is talking about me noting his town slip?
Also from how he's playing in addition to that early slip, Garg is town.
At first I noted that and thought something similar to you so that by itself isn't an important. I want to know what your read on Garg is without referring to the slip and why that is since I didn't find much else to explain your town read on him in this thread (unless there's something past post 600).
The answer should be obvious. Why are you bulking up your post with rhetorical questions?
They are not rhetorical, I want clarification.
I townread him personally for his reaction but the natural conclusion for people to come to without dragging meta into the equation is that it was all null. When soup gets exasperated as scum, it's usually faked to look like he's reacting like he does as town (unless he does it as scum too and it's legit, but I can't remember this being the case). This would mean that he's not actually as flustered as his posts let on, which would mean he would have no reason to replace out because he wouldn't feel actually overwhelmed like his posts imply. Replacing out means to me (this is a bit WIFOM-y so I understand that people may not agree with it) that it's town soup who is actually overwhelmed and not scum soup faking it.
Ok, so you admit that it's not strong reasoning -because- it's meta but your meta analysis comes to a logical conclusion in that he was indeed overwhelmed. However he could be overwhelmed as scum and I disagree with you that just because he was overwhelmed, it makes him town, IMO it's a null.
You know what else is awkward? This entire post from you that I've been responding to so far. You're asking a lot of questions and insinuating dislike on a lot of things about my play without taking any stance. Are you scumreading me now or something? What's with the hardcore focus on me? Hell, what's with your current playstyle of building walls against one player at a time instead of focusing on... y'know... the game itself?
I'm asking questions so I can get a feel of your slot better and make a solid stance, that shouldn't be a problem.
Anyways, to answer your question. Yes, I had a problem with Gorf liking Handorin's post because I took it to mean a form of agreement (as Gorf's likes to me usually meant he either agrees with the post or finds it humorous), yet what Hando said was opposite to what Gorf had been preaching. So I was trying to get Gorf to explain to me why he liked the post. When he clarified that it was because he thought the post was townie rather than agreeing with it, I was fine with that. Why was that not very easy to grasp just by reading the interaction?
I was not sure if you stated what that conversation did for your read so I decided to ask it here. I'm fine with your explanation.
Worse by whose standards? Handorin had a reads contradiction that was a complete null tell and Hollow didn't really enter the game at all. Your entrace was gross and littered with safe questions that didn't lead anywhere and that you didn't follow up on and a bunch of you being cautious. Since people pointed out that you were trying not to step on toes, you then started going a little harder on some slots, but that was easy to do because people had pointed out what was scummy about your play so you could change it. As far as I'm concerned, your entrance into the game was the worst.
Also, this question is bad, as have the last few questions I've answered from you.
*Shrugs* Fair enough.
It should be really apparent why Fanny is townie. Do you not read him as such?
I want to know why you think that. I stated earlier I think he is town and why but I haven't seen your reasoning for a town read on him.
Stances where you can't take the cop-out response of "I'm focusing on this game chunks at a time and I haven't read them yet" which I have used as scum before and which you have used in this game by only having a read on like... 4 players initially. Until I prodded you to reread some people and get more reads for me, but that took me asking rather than you just wanting to do it.
That's how I am. It's a lot harder and less thoughtful to read everyone at once then by looking at certain slots and looking at them in depth. (especially when some people don't enough content to read)
Because if convinced I could see myself going that route. That pool was a pool of people I could see myself lynching based on how the Day progressed, not people I would lynch on the spot.
Ok, so basically you weren't sure if you could be convinced to lynch him but didn't want to rule him out toDay so that's why he was a part of the pool?
No Toed was not a townread. "Swap toed for gorf" meant on BLS's lynch pool he had Toed there, I would put Gorf there instead. Didn't mean switch the two reads entirely. Toed was more of a null there if I recall correctly
Bad reading comprehension on my part :L
Are you dense? I was asking Politoed what he thought. That doesn't mean it reflects my own thoughts or opinions.
It looked like you were putting some of your own thoughts into the question but if you say you weren't there's nothing more to ask about that.
Do you think that was scummy? I dare you to say yes so I can call you out for how hard you're reaching. All I can call you out for now is your non-committal push on me where you imply you don't like things about me but ask a bunch of dumb questions instead of trying to show other people why you don't like me. It's grimy.
So, to ask again. What about Gova after talking to him changed your opinion on the slot?
Because I hadn't read Toed myself and was taking other people's word based on their interpretations. Why is the flip-flopping scummy? If you look and read and have a brain and are town it's quite clear to see my thought process.
I read it and didn't see your thought process so I wanted to know. I never said this flip flopping is scummy, so there's no need to get defensive about it.
I'm pretty sure I already posted this as I reread.
I didn't go past post 600 so possibly.
No I don't think you're safe regardless of alignment. Less active maybe, more careful maybe, but when you're town you're not afraid to form actual opinions. Your style of making walls questioning your scumreads rather than just tackling them is so gross.
Meh, you don't know my meta well if you don't think i'm safe as either alignment.