If your opinion is to keep him around, you are wrong. The logic to keep him around is not sound.Because apparently OS and I have VERY different stances on what to do with a claimed indy.
Confirmed scum or a chance at possible scum.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If your opinion is to keep him around, you are wrong. The logic to keep him around is not sound.Because apparently OS and I have VERY different stances on what to do with a claimed indy.
you were my indy pick til Gorf claimed, dunno if Gova would put a second indy but not important atm.Why move me up the claim list if you town read me?
I don't think anyone should be giving Vult a town read. Look at how he joined the Bardull wagon in 2251+ 2252 and how he joined the Scary Wagon in 1599. Both of those votes looked super opportunistic IIRC, or in short they were buses. Also his stances this game are weak along with his questions.
KwK did not have 13 posts by the time of hammer, Ranmaru did...sooooo yeah.
It faded but I'll look at it again toMorrow. We'll lynch Gorf toDay.
Can't use the same ability two Nights in row.We can make everyone's last post divisible by 5 by having Gheb and Me post and just have Gheb mass roleblock every Night and then have Gorf prevent redirects, reflections, and recruiting.
.Can't use the same ability two Nights in row.
![]()
Yes, entirely; I really should have clarified but that analysis was solely abstract from the votes. I find that the best way to analyze to start, but a re-read upon not having any leads is definitely something people should do. I just know I myself find it very easy as scum to 'bus' my teammates with words but not actions and people somehow find that worthwhile when it really isn't... so I tend to avoid it. I agree with you having a say in the scary wagon.mc's vote analysis doesn't account for some timing/situational factors that aren't visible through votes (e.g. my commitment to the scary wagon despite not having the vote there at the time of hammer).
I also am willing to agree to a Gorf lynch toMorrow if we lynch Ryu (or KwK I guess) toDay. Especially if he flips Mafia and we don't win, but even if he doesn't flip Mafia, as long as Night actions don't make a different player obvMafia.
whoever said mafia would want to save gorf is redic. Law-making ability limits Mafia choices and lets the Town interpret Night information better.
sorry about misinterpreting hammer. I still think Kwk's vote was bad, and we know that he wasn't trying very hard to not hammer seeing as he wasn't paying attention to votes well (ref: 2492).
Basically I want Gorf wagoners to reconsider moving the lynch to toMorrow because it would be in our best interest in the long run. Let's lynch DSH or KwK instead.
What was Ran's scumslip? I'm not against a Ranmaru lynch eventually, but don't feel he's the strongest lynch mechanics-wise. I could be convinced otherwise though.I won't be voting Gorf toDay, and wouldn't ever given the chance to do so. On the play side of things, he hasn't shown a single agenda all game except survival. When I loaned him my vote in D1, he didn't try to make anything of the opportunity. In subsequent Days, he hasn't done anything except to float.
And while the argument to lynch him seems compelling, it basically amounts to, "We have room to do so." This is not a reason or a stance, it's the equivalent of a shrug. It's an excuse for the mafia to take a free lynch without punishment, and it removes one shot at catching mafia. The coming Nights are going to see this player list whittled down.
And much of Gorf's claim is proven -- if his wincon is a lie, if there's even potential for a lie (which I don't think there is), he is still stuck sitting around and using the ability we know he has to our gain. This ability, it's worth noting, is extremely powerful, leaving little to no room for any other ability from a balancing perspective. So there is no potential for danger in leaving Gorf alive until toMorrow at least, and very little moving forward past that. On the contrary, there's a lot to be gained by whittling down the mafia pool as much as we possibly can.
Mafia lies in:
- Ran, first and foremost, on what I strongly believe is a scumslip
- Ryu
- KWK
- Thennnnn Vult/Gheb if we've lynched this far down the line (doubtful)
Mafia doesn't lie in:
- Gorf
... is that so? How do you know?Mafia doesn't lie in:
- Gorf
I'll take "Mafia don't claim indie and expect to win" for 500, Alex.Handorin is also married I think.
... is that so? How do you know?
![]()
Who the **** cares if you claimed Indy survivor. I'd kill one too.I don't even feel that way.
I claimed Indy survivor in itrick'd 1 and still got lynched solely off the fact I claimed Indy.
Kuz even said that was correct and laundry I already quoted and posted his explosion post where he yelled at everyone fir not voting me.
Talk to me post game if you still think it's wrong, you can't trust a claimed Indy.
I put myself on contract. Idiot. I was in no pressure position. I feel like winning and the fact that I'm confident in 3 maf and the fact that I win with you made me say "ahh **** it it'll help the already advantageous faction if I full claim, and they won't believe my powers town, so claim Indy it is."because he's on contract and once he listens to one thing we ask of him he has to listen to the rest of him
he was a detriment to have around and we are in a great spot, im glad he'll be out of the picture
only 1 scum left to find with only 2 townies dead, TOTAL
e z p z
Confirmed ****** but OBV town makes me sad.Oh cool, not even a hammer yet.
If anyone has questions, ask me now since I won't be here Fri. + Saturday.
Gorf lynch still makes sense toDay because confirmed INDY and all that jazz.
BUT YOU GUYS ARE IN A FANTASTIC POSITION. Has that just not clicked? I WANT Y'ALL TO WIN SO I CAN WIN AS WELL. I JUST WANT TO WIN. USING ME CAN ASSURE THAT WE WIN AND THAT WE DO IT FAST! I CAN CONFIRM ROLES. MY PR IS CONFIRMED.Also mafia would not want to lynch Gorf. They can't NK him and with Gorf they can force a prisoner's dilemma if it were to come down to it.
You are a raging anti semitic.Hydra heads are confusing.
I am not removing my vote from Gorf.
No. If we are worried about him we can just lynch him one day away from Lylo.@ranmaru Lynch me tomarrow I will self vote to prevent two priests going into a lylo sitation, would rather have J in lylo. Put your vote back on Gorf.
So if we didn't lynch Gorf, you'd be fine with lynching Ryu, right?It faded but I'll look at it again toMorrow. We'll lynch Gorf toDay.
![]()
They weren't jabs; I was responding to a ****ing question that you asked. But what you're saying you did is exactly what I'm accusing you of doing. You started with the idea of Nabescum with MC, then built a case to suit that need by cherry-picking the relevant posts. There's a disparity here between what a townie would do (come to a conclusion about a player by reading their posts) and what you did (conclude, then choose posts to suit that conclusion).@#HBC | Nabe . I skimmed that post, because to me it seemed like reads changing on MC. I missed the part of you RB'ing MC, which is evident in me asking you on your thoughts on MC (yet you didn't answer). I didn't care to go any further because I didn't want to talk too much about you/MC, because I was trying to stay safe as the cop. I in no way analyzed your post and then thought "Oh ok, this will definitely destroy my case, I'll just not use it." I was also ignoring your jabs at me. (You seem off, why are you swearing [when I swear occasionally]). Your point is that I would have weighed everything as carefully as possible, but that's not what I did. I picked what I felt was important, posted it in my evernote, and then typed my thoughts on each quote/link's relevance.
If you skimmed to find evidence, then you knew it was there. You also should have known it was there by reading through the game the first time. And another post you would have known was there: a post your attention was brought to twice concerning my take on my interactions with MC, which should have been evidence in a case about my interactions with MC. And the kicker: you already admitted to knowing it was there, understanding its content, and not addressing it, which was the point of my case on you. It's proof that you started with your conclusion, rather than reaching it as town through skim-bias as might have been the case. Are you recanting that admission, or do you otherwise take issue to my holding it as an admission?You also forget it is harder to find evidence through many pages. You have to understand I'd try to get the things I find most suspicious instead of using more time to gather up ALL YOUR POSTS.
When a player scumslips, you tend to focus on that detail.You are also not really considering the rest of my play when it comes to your scum read on me, and simply on the case on you. This is more of an OMGUS than a scumread. Before that you only had me as townlean to null?
Two days, because people lose there votes at times.No. If we are worried about him we can just lynch him one day away from Lylo.
I don't care how special your role is or if you pinky promise to town side.Who the **** cares if you claimed Indy survivor. I'd kill one too.
I'm an Indy who's role is too god damn powerful to be anything else. Ask yourself. With what I claimed (AND OF WHICH IS COMPLETELY PROVABLE MIND YOU), aside from my wincon, is there ANYTHING else I can have up my sleeve? Please tell me. No. There's not. Cool. If it's close to endgame LYNCH MY ***! It's that simple!
Glyph did it in bingo mafia and I've seen games on mafia scum where they did as well.I'll take "Mafia don't claim indie and expect to win" for 500, Alex.
Then he deserved it because we read it wrong.Glyph did it in bingo mafia