J has definitely been defensive wrt my posts.
Of course I am going to be defensive to posts that personally attack me so moot point
Here you give a list of confirmed town/town reads v. people who "need to be looked into more", so no real information about where you are looking into or who you think is scummy yet. So you avoid giving out information right away.
What are you talking about July? I've been, if not, the most forward person to give information out right away. Especially if we are to bring up my claim where I brought that info to light fast as hell. Also I did say who is scummy i.e. Sang/AM and that can be determined to where I was going to be looking at when I did my re-read, no? The simple answer is yes.
July said:
This feels defensive to me because Nich brings up a valid point that if you had a huge issue with Panta possibly claiming doc, so your surprise at Nich asking about how we feel about you after TC's doc flip seems feigned. You also defend yourself by saying bodguard/doc seems like a weak doc, but I don't see anything that suggests that, it purely seems like speculation to defend yourself.
However, that's all I got July, speculation because I know for a fact I'm town jailer. How does defending myself to what seems to be an arbritary attack scummy?
July said:
This post seems to me like you are just feeling out people's reads and what's going on in their head while at the same time you haven't done this yourself, which I find suspicious and once again, invasive.
Whaaaaaaat? Girl what are you talking about? I always feel out people's reads and what's going on in their noggins because that's who I is. If i haven't done it myself, I'm looking for leads. Yet again, how is this scummy?
July said:
This is your general reads post, which I feel could have been explained in your first post instead of seperating everyone into obv/confirmed town v. not obv town. It feels like you are giving things piece by piece to avoid giving content, and in that sense it feels evasive because you just keep giving us little pieces of info but no substantiation or explanation. And I feel like that's how your Sang scum read has been all game, so that is the read I would by far like reasoning for the most.
Already explained this point I think. Alright, I'll be sure to jam pack my SangScum read very nicely.
July said:
This seems defensive. You don't acknowledge the issues with the Panta doc claim, your claim and then TC's flip, you just write it off and say to "double check a few things". But with so many people bringing up issues with this same event, it is something you need to actually address.
And now I have but then again July, how is being defensive to something like that scummy? Put yourself in my shoes.
July said:
Once again, its defensive (at this point Kuz v. J hasn't launched into the full conflict it would be) and your question to Sang is just evading the issue. Instead of explaining to Sang that it is/can be logical, you turn it back on her and ask her why it isn't logical instead, but you yourself seemed to think it couldn't be logical when Panta's claim was going on. All in all you don't address the issue because I think you realize it isn't logical either, but you can't admit that.
July, it is logical to me because I actually know what is what. I don't get how it's illogical at all because I know it's the truth so I want her to explain as such. Plus Panta's claim=/=TC's claim whatsoever.
July said:
Reason this is a question is confusing, I took this as you thought the answer was obvious. But with everything going on it was important to know why you had such an issue with Panta's claim because of TC's flip and your claim in relation to that.
I think I've explained this point throughly by now. ;P
In terms of intent wouldn't it be easier to just call hilt scum and attack him normally if AM were scum. Why call him indy specifically and then try to take the long way? If Hilt actually flipped indy it would look worse on AM that they were actually indy hunting.
You're right about them not backing up their **** which, again, has townie intent so I don't know where you're going with that.
Your thing about him not backing up his **** like his case on Seikend fits in to the above category of why would he do that as scum? The surface of everything he does is anti-town, but the intent of all his posts are townie and therefore he's town.
*the fountain of knowledge has spoken*
Just saying, you called the case on Acro full of WIFOM when this in fact, is full of "what ifs" and WIFOM.