• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

FIFA World Cup 2010

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Howard Webb was giving the Dutch more lives than a cat with his leniency.

He's traditionally lenient with cards in finals.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
lol at not being biased.
AND IT WAS OFFSIDE.. ARE U BLIND?
Not the pass on iniesta but beforehand.
Actually, it wasn't.

The replay clearly showed it.

And even if it were, **** off Spain deserved that win.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
There seems to be a trend with violent bald people in World Cup finals these days.



And no Dutch guy, it wasn't.
 

Kole

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
1,434
Location
UCLA
i didn't like how Mathijsen got pissed at the ref and threw the ball at the end
 

Nihonjin

Striving 4 Perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
2,867
Location
Amsterdam, Holland


HOLLAND WANT TO COMPLAIN? LOOOOOOOOL
Taken out of context, he was only looking at the ball and went up to control it, by the time he saw the Spanish guy it was already too late and he couldn't pull back anymore.

It's similar to how the guy from Urugay kicked a dutch player in the face, it was an accident.


Anyway;



It wasn't offside.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6XDvQkI7uI

Lets bet €5000 euro's son.

NOT THE PASS ON INIESTA BUT BEFOREHAND OMFG.
Pay up.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Look at this thread tommorow. Your gonna see the vid Mr. Blind person
Lol even Clarence Seedorf said both passes were onside, and of course he would be biased against the Dutch right?
 

Mr-R

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,544
YES holland played a bit rough, but they got MORE THAN ENOUGH cards for it
what about spain? did they get a card when they were hanging on robben when he was about to make a goal ? NO, instead robben gets a yellow card for complaining. yeah thats totally not biased.

those last minuts were sooooooooooooooo unfair heres why

Elia getting crushed by 2 players and not getting a free kick
when sneijer took that free kick, some spanish defender OBVIOUSLY HIT THE BALL, SO IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A CORNER INSTEAD OF A GOAL KICK
and then the goal..... it was OFFSIDE no the goal itself wasnt offside, but the pass before was

3 unfair events in less then 2 minuts gg
 

Kole

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
1,434
Location
UCLA
I agree it was offsides, but Holland would most likely have lost in penalty kicks anyway, sadly.

congrats to spain
 

Mr-R

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,544
those vids proof nothing at all from that angle, u need a vid that shows u how it was recorded from the sides
we saw one from the sides, and even the commentary said it was defintely offside
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
Taken out of context, he was only looking at the ball and went up to control it, by the time he saw the Spanish guy it was already too late and he couldn't pull back anymore.

It's similar to how the guy from Urugay kicked a dutch player in the face, it was an accident.
No it was dangerous play and he was no where near the ball.

Anyway;



It wasn't offside.
Thank you.



lol at offside

Elia was not fouled.

Puyol had an arm on Robben for 2 seconds yes, but Robben played on and had a goal scoring opporrtunity.

He was booked for shouting at the ref for like 5 minutes.

HOLLAND CAN ONLY COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CORNER THAT WAS NOT GIVEN.
 

Laem

Smash Champion
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
2,292
Location
Nightrain
Well idk what the usual policy is
but puyol made a deliberate attempt of sweeping robben off his feet
robben was just able to jump over it
 

Nihonjin

Striving 4 Perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
2,867
Location
Amsterdam, Holland
Puyol had an arm on Robben for 2 seconds yes, but Robben played on and had a goal scoring opporrtunity.
Advantage was given, but obviously Robben wasn't at an advantage because he missed, he should've gotten a free kick. And Puyol should've gotten his second yellow card and should've been sent off.

Also, Iniesta should've gotten a red card for attacking Van Bommel out of spite.

He was booked for shouting at the ref for like 5 minutes.

HOLLAND CAN ONLY COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CORNER THAT WAS NOT GIVEN.
^And about those situations I just mentioned.

And how about when Iniesta stepped on Heitinga's foot and got a free kick for it?

They can also complain about getting cards for every offense they made, when the Spanish played aggressive as well and made their fair share of fouls but didn't get any cards.

The ref ruined the game really..
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
Advantage was given, but obviously Robben wasn't at an advantage because he missed, he should've gotten a free kick. And Puyol should've gotten his second yellow card and should've been sent off.
You can't give advantage and a foul. It's one or the other.

Also, Iniesta should've gotten a red card for attacking Van Bommel out of spite.
I thought he should have been sent off but he hardly touched him and anyway his reaction was after Van Bommel went studs first over his foot.

If Iniesta should have been sent off than Van Bommel had to too.

Oh? How about when Iniesta stepped on Heitinga's foot and got a free kick for it?
Can't remember it tbh.

They can also complain about getting cards for every offense they made, when the Spanish played aggressive as well and made their fair share of fouls but didn't get any cards.

The ref ruined the game really..
Sneijder studs up against Busquests = red

De Jong Karate Kid 3 audition = red

Van Bommel's 1,000,000 fouls = red

Holland kicked lumps out of the Spanish, you really can't compare the two.

Anyway, Robben should have scored twice. If Holland want to blame someone blame him.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Well idk what the usual policy is
but puyol made a deliberate attempt of sweeping robben off his feet
robben was just able to jump over it
Yeah but he seemed to miraculously have the strength to stay on his feet and continue into the box, and after Casillas dispossessed him fairly, he falls over like a diving, sneaky little **** that he is.

If you notice, Puyol's little tug was outside the box, which of course Robben, seeing no real advantage of going down there when he thinks he can score, doesn't go down.

Suddenly Casillas owns him.

OMG I ARE DEAD.

He deserved his fate.

And no insekt, Spain has never won the World Cup, they've had less World Cup success than Holland.
 

Nihonjin

Striving 4 Perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
2,867
Location
Amsterdam, Holland
You can't give advantage and a foul. It's one or the other.
Yes you can.

If a ref gives you the advantage and it works to your disadvantage, then he can still call the foul. Just like how if Robben scored he could've still given Puyol the yellow & red card he deserved.

This isn't something new, it's been done countless of times.

I thought he should have been sent off but he hardly touched him and anyway his reaction was after Van Bommel went studs first over his foot.

If Iniesta should have been sent off than Van Bommel had to too.
It's about the intention.

Van Bommel went for the ball (and missed, it was a foul the ref missed as well), but Iniesta purposely attacked van Bommel because he was angry. (though it wasn't that bad, it's still red).

Sneijder studs up against Busquests = red
I don't remember Sneijder making any foul that deserved a red card.

De Jong Karate Kid 3 audition = red
His intention was the ball, it was unlucky for the Spanish guy, but it wasn't a red especially since he had no prior offenses.

Van Bommel's 1,000,000 fouls = red
Maybe. But seeing as he sent of Heitinga for no reason, that kind of evens it out.

Anyway, Robben should have scored twice. If Holland want to blame someone blame him.
The first one was Robben's own fault, the second one wasn't. Puyol was piggy back riding him by force.

Best team won.
Maybe, but this game didn't go the way it should've.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Reckless play still warrants a red card, even if the intention was for the ball.

You can't just let your foot fly out wherever.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
Robben was given the chance to score, through his own honest decision to stay on his feet and the ref giving advantage. And he messed it up. Puyol was on the floor by the time he was in the box.

You're right Iniesta should have not reacted.

De Jong is a red, I'm sorry. It is dangerous play, with or without intention. He knew a Spanish player would go for the ball and he was no where near the ball. It's not like the overhead kick in the Uruguay game, he had no clue there were others going for the ball.

Sneijder nailed Busquets at knee height with studs showing. Then rolled around like he got fouled.
 

Nihonjin

Striving 4 Perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
2,867
Location
Amsterdam, Holland
Reckless play still warrants a red card, even if the intention was for the ball.

You can't just let your foot fly out wherever.
Then you think the guy from Urugay should've gotten a red card for kicking a dutch defender in the face by accident?

No, it doesn't work that way.

Robben was given the chance to score, through his own honest decision to stay on his feet and the ref giving advantage. And he messed it up. Puyol was on the floor by the time he was in the box.
It's still a foul and Puyol still should've gotten his second yellow card.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Then you think the guy from Urugay should've gotten a red card for kicking a dutch defender in the face by accident?

No, it doesn't work that way.
Actually, he definitely should have, but he didn't.

Referees were being all soft soft because it was the knockout and all, but really, these were knockout killer collisions going on.
 
Top Bottom