Laggalot101
Smash Apprentice
Truly, I'm shocked (in the positive sense) at the results of both Smash games. I don't think I, or anyone else, could have suspected that either game would be this succesful. Truly, this is a beautiful day for the Smash community as a whole!
I don't get why players of either game always feel the need to argue with eachother. I mean, I do in a sense (it's a chain reaction of mutual frustration, as well as a few trolls here and there) but I don't agree with the behavior. Never have and I probably never will. Neither game is going to phase the other out, neither game is unfairly or undeservingly 'riding' the other (riding sounds so condescending anyway), neither game is better than the other. They both have qualities to make them unique and appealing in their own way.
Dare I say I think both games straight up benefit from eachother's presence and achievements. From Melee being the game that laid the fundaments for competitive Smash as we know it today and generally being the more technically demanding and obviously more fleshed out game (if only due to age. Not going to start a seperate discussion on that, though). Melee is a game that should be respected for what it has done for the series as a whole since its release. On the other hand, there's Smash 4 which is infinitely more approachable for a variety of reasons and being a very new game it is much more likely to reach and draw a new audience into the competitive smash scene, which is healthy for the series as a whole, and the game itself is competitively viable and competent enough to be widely appealing and to sustain itself as a competitive game. And again, Smash 4 is early in its life, so who knows what its still future holds for the series? I believe this game holds a very positive position for the series, and the prospect of what this game might still hold for the series in patches and DLC in the future is something I find both curious and exciting.
Truly, these games can only benefit from eachother's existance.
I don't get why players of either game always feel the need to argue with eachother. I mean, I do in a sense (it's a chain reaction of mutual frustration, as well as a few trolls here and there) but I don't agree with the behavior. Never have and I probably never will. Neither game is going to phase the other out, neither game is unfairly or undeservingly 'riding' the other (riding sounds so condescending anyway), neither game is better than the other. They both have qualities to make them unique and appealing in their own way.
Dare I say I think both games straight up benefit from eachother's presence and achievements. From Melee being the game that laid the fundaments for competitive Smash as we know it today and generally being the more technically demanding and obviously more fleshed out game (if only due to age. Not going to start a seperate discussion on that, though). Melee is a game that should be respected for what it has done for the series as a whole since its release. On the other hand, there's Smash 4 which is infinitely more approachable for a variety of reasons and being a very new game it is much more likely to reach and draw a new audience into the competitive smash scene, which is healthy for the series as a whole, and the game itself is competitively viable and competent enough to be widely appealing and to sustain itself as a competitive game. And again, Smash 4 is early in its life, so who knows what its still future holds for the series? I believe this game holds a very positive position for the series, and the prospect of what this game might still hold for the series in patches and DLC in the future is something I find both curious and exciting.
Truly, these games can only benefit from eachother's existance.
Last edited: