D
Deleted member
Guest
By Sakurai's standards, nope.Hey Golden.
Dark Samus needs a redesign.
jk she's different enough(or it?)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
By Sakurai's standards, nope.Hey Golden.
Dark Samus needs a redesign.
jk she's different enough(or it?)
Is it just me,or would that look kind of silly?...Or they could just shrink him. It's not like his size is one of his defining characteristics.
Or maybe Noob Saibot?Side Special: Dark Echo - Sends an echo of herself forward to strike opponent. [think Zero's W-Shredder attack from Megaman X5]
*Googles Noob Saibot*Or maybe Noob Saibot?
I'm rooting for Sanctuary Fortress. You fight Dark Samus there, making it topical. It's also widely considered one of the best areas, if not the best, in the Metroid series. There's tons of potential for stage features and hazards with all the spider ball spheres and that giant dynamo.*Googles Noob Saibot*
Yeah, that would work too.
As much as I like (and want) Skytown Elysia to be the new Metroid Prime stage in Super Smash Bros, if Dark Samus is playable I think Phaaze would make more sense. Not only does it make the most sensible home-court stage for DS, Phaaze is kind of the culmination of the entire Prime trilogy. Still don't like the idea of another cave dweller stage, but it makes sense, I guess. Still rooting for Skytown.
That brings up the question of who wrote the trophy descriptions. I'm guessing Sakurai didn't write them all, since he has a few more important jobs for the game, and there's a LOT of them.By Sakurai's standards, nope.
Wow, that's a lot of work. I underestimated his dedication.He wrote all the trophy descriptions in Melee, if that means anything.
I have no idea about Dark Pit, since I haven't played Kid Icarus.While I'm not trying to bash D.S., since I actually support her/it being next in line after Ridley, I'm going to play the Devil's Advocate here.
Metroid Prime 2 had a distinctly different look for D.S. compared to Samus, yet similar abilities.
Metroid Prime 3 introduced a bunch of different abilities (taken from the other hunters), yet a look that is more comparable to a Samus recolor. (Especially when Samus gets the full corruption when you fail the game.)
If in fact, Sakurai did write Brawl's Trophy descriptions, and thought D.S. was just a recolor back in Prime 2, then I don't think Prime 3 would change that viewpoint. Sure, the abilities have changed, and she can easily be different, but it opens up a case that is typically used against someone like Dark Pit.
Wolf missed his chance in Melee because of that. "Dark Samus looks too much like Samus" is a legitimate argument against her. Hurts the variety of the roster as a whole. Kind of like why we don't need another moustachioed plumber in overalls. Obviously some characters get a free pass, but I doubt Dark Samus is on the same level as Luigi. BUUUT Lucas, so who knows.Comparing her appearance to Samus would be like comparing Wolf to Fox.
Wolf looks like a spikier Fox. Prime 3 Dark Samus looks like a streamlined Samus (She actually looks less like Varia Suit Samus than Prime 2's).Minor changes in detail vs. completely different appearance.
And he still got in Brawl even though he looks like a spikier Fox. And as you said, Lucas, so who knows?Wolf missed his chance in Melee because of that. "Dark Samus looks too much like Samus" is a legitimate argument against her. Hurts the variety of the roster as a whole. Kind of like why we don't need another moustachioed plumber in overalls. Obviously some characters get a free pass, but I doubt Dark Samus is on the same level as Luigi. BUUUT Lucas, so who knows.
Nothing against her, but I think the best anyone could do is hope to be pleasantly Surprised.
The grapple beam grab idea being faster but shorter is awesome and the pummel is even more so.Grabs & Throws
Grab – Reaches forward with Grapple Beam. While shorter then Samus, it’s faster. Much, much faster.
Pummel – Burns opponent with Phazon. Does 2% damage for each Phazon burn.
Back Throw – Tosses the opponent backwards and activates her Phazon Booster. Deals 10% Dark Damage. Her best
Forward Throw – Slams opponent down and chucks them with a over-head throw Does 7% damage.
Up Throw – Fully extends the Grapple Beam and thrusts the opponent upwards. Does 8% damage.
Down Throw – Throws her opponent down and slams her heel into them. Does 8% damage.
That's an interesting argument. Would it suddenly be better if she was named Metroid Prime instead? Does a name really matter that much? One is the main character, one is the main character not wearing her suit of armor because of fanservice, one is a character who just resembles the main character but functions completely differently, and the other is a giant space dragon.By looks alone? Try NAME.
For one I think it would look bad for Metroid to have 3/4 of its characters be a Samus, lol.
Dark Samus doesn't use the grapple beam, so nope.Let's get back to movesets for a little while, shall we?
The grapple beam grab idea being faster but shorter is awesome and the pummel is even more so.
But for the forward throw, what if you just use one mid-sized blast of phazon to send the opponent forward. It could also damage other characters within reach.
They both look fairly similar; similar builds, similar overall shapes.A "spikier Fox". Really?
That's really your argument?
If you were to put Fox and Wolf next to each other and Samus and Dark Samus next to each other, you'd have more people being able to tell a crapton of differences between the former pair than the latter pair.
Wouldn't that be because Samus changes her armor all the time, while it's kinda difficult to change your fur color?EDIT: The uninformed might even think Dark Samus is Samus by looks alone (even more so with the fact Samus has many different suits), while they'd at least be able to tell that Wolf is a different character from Fox. (Now if you put Fox and James next to each other...then they might think it was the same character...)
There's more to it than that. Variety in all manners is important. Like it might have looked bad to add both Ridley and Charizard in Brawl, so Charizard won out. It's not a very satisfactory criteria, but it's there.Visual similarity to another character in appearance shouldn't matter unless both characters look similar enough that you'll get them confused from a distance. Otherwise, it's not going to matter in creating movesets; Ganondorf looks nothing like Captain Falcon.
I didn't notice it. You seemed pretty nice. I'm sorry if I sounded too confrontational too.Before I read your post, I want to outfront apologise, as what I said seemed more confrontational than it should've been.
When I was talking about confusion, I was mainly meaning in the middle of a match. For example, if Ryu and Ken were both in the game, it would be very difficult to tell them apart in the middle of a match because they both have similar attacks and look very similar, even though they're probably the two most famous Street Fighter characters. Same thing with Luigi; if you have a Luigi fighting a Mario in Smash 64, for example, it's actually pretty tough to tell which is which because their attacks are so similar. Same with Link and Young Link in Melee.EDIT: No one confuses him with Mario because people know the following:
1. He's Mario's brother.
2. He's not only his brother, but by the Yoshi series, he's his twin brother. Twins that are not fraternal look alike.
3. Luigi is an infamous character and name. When people hear "Luigi", more likely than not, they're going to think "Mario's brother".
Dark Samus is not an infamous character, and by name alone, implies that it's either an evil version of Samus (which is the case), or Samus in a "Dark Suit" (which I'm well aware there is an unrelated Dark Suit Samus).
With Fox and Wolf, by name alone tells a difference. One's a fox, the other's a wolf.
Well, hopefully that changes; otherwise, we might have another Ridley-less, Dark Samus-less game.There's more to it than that. Variety in all manners is important. Like it might have looked bad to add both Ridley and Charizard in Brawl, so Charizard won out. It's not a very satisfactory criteria, but it's there.
That's why I think there's no problem for Dark Samus. Not only would her colors likely look completely different from Samus's (I'm imagining one solid color across her entire body, with her visor and chest changing to a lighter version of that color). She also moves very differently than Samus; her basic movement in her fights, for example, is floating around, and even when walking she is rather hunched.It really isn't that difficult, to be quite honest.
When it gets to the threshold where two similar characters are in the game, it gets very easy to pick out who's who by various distincts they have otherwise, be it mannerisms, voice, or certain key distinctions (like in the case of Ryu and Ken, you have a guy wearing a headband with short hair, and one with long hair and no headband). When colors come into play, that is solely on the person being able to tell who has what color. For example, again with Ryu and Ken, if both were in, Ryu would not have a red color similar to Ken. He'd likely have a pink color instead. Playing on this for alternate colors, Ken would likely get the darker hues while Ryu gets the lighter hues (compare the blue on Blue Team Mario and the blue on Blue Team Luigi to get what I mean).
This is where Oasis' point on Ridley and Charizard falls apart. Despite both being dragonoid creatures, it is VERY easy to distinct the two.
The thing I like about Dark Samus is that she has so much potential for a unique moveset because she's a very gimmicky opponent. She's much less straightforward than somebody like Ridley.However, before that threshold, characters that have minor differences have the biggest challenge; would they be worth it?
There is no arguement that they CAN be different, but the question lies in WILL they be different enough to be worthy of inclusion.
I wasn't really arguing about visual distinction during a match. It's more that Sakurai would strive for as varied a cast as possible, or maybe only varied ADDITIONS to the cast. AGAIN TO BRING UP RIDLEY AS EXAMPLE, Sakurai might have thought "I've already added one dragon character, perhaps instead of adding another I should add a robot instead."This is where Oasis' point on Ridley and Charizard falls apart. Despite both being dragonoid creatures, it is VERY easy to distinct the two.
He's still flavor of the month, having appeared in only the most recent Metroid game (And a rather divisive game at that). He didn't die at the end, so a further appearance is possible, but that's like advocating for U-Mos because he also didn't die at the end and might show up in a future game.@DarkSouls: As for Anthony, he's pretty much one of the main things that people cared for in Other M or so I have heard.
Anyways, I wouldn't count Anthony out just yet, as he's given us something we had yet to see in a Metroid title; a sidekick of sorts. Anthony is someone that provides a connection to Samus that no one else has (except for maybe Adam, but the relationship was more of that of a father figure), in that the two are close friends and partners (in a way).
While Anthony is still too minor of a character, it isn't farfetched to believe that he will appear in future titles (which will take place either before or after Fusion).
I guess. I'm not exactly going to argue for Adam Malkovich; not after Other M.Adam isn't much of a major player himself.
I mean, SURE he is also Samus' computer in Fusion, but he's still relatively minor of a character otherwise.
I doubt it. MB just got angry when they tried to shut her down; she's evil because she's angry, while Mother Brain is just evil. She's based off of Mother Brain in the story, but she looks and acts like a completely different character.There are only 4 major players in the series; Samus, Ridley, Mother Brain, and Dark Samus. And if you want to narrow it down, Dark Samus is only major in the Prime series, and Mother Brain is only major in a couple of games (Other M included, as it's because of Mother Brain's influence that things went horribly wrong.)
If we're talking about major roles in the series, we can really just end F-Zero at Captain Falcon, Star Fox at Fox, and Legend of Zelda at Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf/Ganon (Maybe Tingle). Pokemon could really just be Pokemon Trainer and Pikachu, since Jigglypuff, Lucario, and Mewtwo aren't exactly important to the whole series. And let's not even talk about the minute chances of characters like Waluigi. Zero-Suit Samus isn't exactly important to the series beyond being Samus, much like how Shiek isn't really that important to LoZ beyond being Zelda.While Ridley hasn't been the main villain ever, he is still notable for being in near every title in some way, shape, or form, as well as the main reason why Samus even does what she does in the first place.
So when it comes down to it, Samus and Ridley are the major two to use and you can end it there with no problems.
You are incorrect on multiple accounts.I doubt it. MB just got angry when they tried to shut her down; she's evil because she's angry, while Mother Brain is just evil. She's based off of Mother Brain in the story, but she looks and acts like a completely different character.
Not exactly. Goroh is a prominent character and has been since the beginning, being Captain Falcon's "rival" (only he considers himself this though, as Falcon pays him no mind).If we're talking about major roles in the series, we can really just end F-Zero at Captain Falcon, Star Fox at Fox, and Legend of Zelda at Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf/Ganon (Maybe Tingle). Pokemon could really just be Pokemon Trainer and Pikachu, since Jigglypuff, Lucario, and Mewtwo aren't exactly important to the whole series. And let's not even talk about the minute chances of characters like Waluigi. Zero-Suit Samus isn't exactly important to the series beyond being Samus, much like how Shiek isn't really that important to LoZ beyond being Zelda.
I don't think a series representation has to just be limited to those important to the entire series.
Coming from the man who only included Ganondorf because he was similar in body shape to Capt. Falcon... Just saying.Wolf missed his chance in Melee because of that. "Dark Samus looks too much like Samus" is a legitimate argument against her. Hurts the variety of the roster as a whole. Kind of like why we don't need another moustachioed plumber in overalls. Obviously some characters get a free pass, but I doubt Dark Samus is on the same level as Luigi. BUUUT Lucas, so who knows.
Nothing against her, but I think the best anyone could do is hope to be pleasantly Surprised.
I checked the scene again, and while the dialogue is horrible (She adopted Mother Brain's consciousness after you based her off of Mother Brain? Really?), you're right.You are incorrect on multiple accounts.
1. MB was created with Mother Brain's AI, and she went rogue when Mother's data started to take control. Madeleine even mentions that she eventually adapted Mother Brain's personality.
2. She was clearly evil before they tried to shut her down. That's why they were GOING TO shut her down. Again, Madeleine mentions that she started to become rampant and went rogue after manifesting Mother's emotions.
But Goroh isn't particularly prominent. He was one of the original racers, but there were four original racers.Not exactly. Goroh is a prominent character and has been since the beginning, being Captain Falcon's "rival" (only he considers himself this though, as Falcon pays him no mind).
However, is Wolf really one of the main elements of Star Fox? That's your criteria. It's hard to imagine a Zelda game without Link, Zelda, and Ganon/Ganondorf. It's hard to imagine a Metroid game without Samus and Ridley (And Metroids). It's hard to imagine a Mario game without Mario, Bowser, Peach, Toad, and Luigi. But it's rather easy to make a Star Fox game without Wolf. As you say later, the original crew are really the core of Star Fox.Wolf has been a major contributor in every game in the series except Adventures and the original StarFox (which was rebooted into 64, where Wolf IS in). In 64, he was like Ridley; a high ranking "minion" to the main villain (in this case, Andross) with a vendetta against the protagonist. In Assault, he started off antagonistic, then became a surprise helper to Fox during the Aparoid invasion. Command? A lot there, but the game is non-canon and sucked anyway that I don't want to get into it.
I was thinking of them as being more important than Wolf, actually. However, people like Wolf better than Slippy or Peppy, and popularity plays a factor.And also, each of the original 3 of Fox's teammates are important in their own right.
I'll explain the rest later.
As far as Ridley having main villain status in a game goes, I'd say that holds true for at least Zero Mission, since the final boss wasn't Mother Brain like in the original, but a robot built out of his likeness and image, with most of the remainder of the game taking place in his ship no less. Just saying. Ironic too that Zero Mission was the most represented Metroid game in Brawl (more-so than any of Retro's work), even if it was mostly because of ZSS.She's also the main villain of the Metroid Prime sub-series, appearing as the final boss in each game and the main antagonist in two (I'd say the Ing and Dark Aether are the real main antagonist of Metroid Prime 2). Ridley is a recurring boss, but he's never been main villain status; he's more of a nemesis, a super-persistent threat. The only character comparable to Dark Samus in role is Mother Brain, the main villain of Metroid and Super Metroid, and while I love Mother Brain, she's probably not getting in (Although if Sakurai found a way, Mother Brain+Ridley would be awesome).
On a sidenote, I heavily object to Anthony or MB getting in. Both are "flavor of the month" characters who are just in the most recent game, and both also come from the most hated Metroid game. Adam Malkovich at least has more importance to the franchise because of his appearance in Fusion, but people really didn't like him in Other M, and he doesn't exactly have exciting moveset potential.
As far as appearance goes, I like Dark Samus's transparent form that you face at the end of Echoes the best, which also happens to be the most inhuman looking and resembles Metroid Prime the most.Dark Samus is one of my top wanted characters. Put me on the supporter list.
Hey Venus, here's ur OP Dark Samus image with a transparent background.
I really wish they kept her design from Echoes, she looked more inhuman.
Once my laptop gets fixed prepare for a moveset & color swaps.
Not to me. Hell, the games without Wolf weren't nearly as critically or financially successful as the games that had him. Coincidence? I think not.It's hard to imagine a Zelda game without Link, Zelda, and Ganon/Ganondorf. It's hard to imagine a Metroid game without Samus and Ridley (And Metroids). It's hard to imagine a Mario game without Mario, Bowser, Peach, Toad, and Luigi. But it's rather easy to make a Star Fox game without Wolf.
Whose more important there is subjective. Either way, Wolf made those other two look useless in comparison when he helped Fox with the Aparoids.I was thinking of them as being more important than Wolf, actually. However, people like Wolf better than Slippy or Peppy, and popularity plays a factor.
Dark Samus is a female/genderless creature.Dark samus should be a unlockable samus costume, so he's not a pure clone.... not that i hate him, but i think it would be like adding dark link...he's in now, but as a costume, it's not that i hate him but that would be like adding dark ...etc