Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Unlikely. Vult's probably off my lynchpool for the moment. Though I don't remember just what he wanted Vinyl lynched for I think I remember inactivity not being a major part of his case but I could be wrong. It's definitely something I'll look into and question Vult about in the near future.
Did I ever tell you just how much I hate you?
Well then you should tell us what they were, someone has them.
Why'd you suggest these guys over Vinyl?
What's your opinion on that likelihood?
I get 3 shots of my power, since it costed 5 Psi and I had a total of 15 Psi. When I target a player I will protect them, when I protect scum I die.
I've commented on it yesterDay:
And while we're on the subject: what exactly was it that made you prefer Vinyl over frozen / Glyph as lynches when it came to inactivity? Since they were comparable what made you so sure that Vinyl is the one that needs to die the most? Vinyl died and flipped scum so that's definitely a fact that speaks in your favor but that doesn't mean that an explanation from your side isn't due. The way I see it there was no particular reason to see Vinyl's level of inactivity as more damning than that of the other players mention so there must've been something else that bothered you about him, no?
Though his claim was not an important reason I changed my mind on lynching him yesterDay, I think what happens now incriminates him. I particularly dislike this:
YesterDay Ryu claimed to have an extremely powerful, semi-confirmable role that caused a lot of people to ultimately decide against lynching him. Now that there are supposed to be results he claims that his active abilities have been removed completely which means that whatever he claims to have been able to - kind of a big part on why he wasn't lynched - he is not actually able to do anymore. And now all of a sudden there's a "clause" about his role that makes it look important to keep him alive again? There's at least one assumption too much in that story for me to completely buy it. This is the kind of WIFOM scenario where I'd personally just straight up prefer to use Occam's Razor and lynch him rather than to wait for what next fantastic claim he has to offer. But I'll admit that I don't feel certain enough about it to actively push a lynch on him right now. Something keeps me hesitating - for now I'd definitely prefer to squeeze some answers out of Glyph and frozen. Especially now that one inactive player has already flipped scum I feel like that could prove to be fruitful.
You make a pretty good point that sets Vinyl off from those guys.
Well, okay. I don't think I agree but I'll respond later with some more detail after more people give input.
Yes, it's only two little remarks about Vinyl but the point is very concrete and you even mention that you found whatever little Vinyl offered to be somewhat scummy. The only stronger push you've made so far has been against Swiss and I don't remember you making any kind of statement of Glyph or frozen. Is it really as weird as you seem to think if somebody concludes from this that you had a clear preference towards lynching Vinyl over lynching the other two slots? I think anybody who reads through your posts would've come to the same conclusion as I did. Alledging that I have not been paying attention isn't the sensible choice, I know exactly what you've been saying and what not.
I do know what you're referring to, but I think you interpreted it way wrong. I just am not sure if it was a mistake or intentional.
Not if they read carefully enough and consider the circumstances
You implied that I had factored in Vinyl's activity level when I pushed him! That is, like, whoa. I was not in the game long enough to know who was active and who wasn't. You also implied (via language like "made you so sure that Vinyl needed to die the most") that I methodically and carefully planned my push when I was really like "derp guise i found this what do you think"
This is weak as balls.Multiquoting is such a pain with this new forum -.-
@Vult
This is what I'm talking about:
Yes, it's only two little remarks about Vinyl but the point is very concrete and you even mention that you found whatever little Vinyl offered to be somewhat scummy. The only stronger push you've made so far has been against Swiss and I don't remember you making any kind of statement of Glyph or frozen. Is it really as weird as you seem to think if somebody concludes from this that you had a clear preference towards lynching Vinyl over lynching the other two slots? I think anybody who reads through your posts would've come to the same conclusion as I did. Alledging that I have not been paying attention isn't the sensible choice, I know exactly what you've been saying and what not.
why
We've got some sort of night killer who just targeted a inactive, so why are you pressuring with votes? Why are you pressuring anything instead of voting a scumread?Coin flipped Vote frozen
Crackhead is mad ugly.
I don't think you've convincingly laid out why it is a mistake and not just a different way of looking at things that could viewed as equally true - saying that I made a mistake implies that I'm wrong about something but I can't see what I'm supposed to be wrong about no matter how many times I read through it. Nothing I've said or assumed about this scenatio contradicts anything that has actually happened.
OK, let's break the scenario down to its essence. This is what has happened:
No, you implied that you had factored it in:
That was before I had ever talked to you about the inactivity levels of these three players.
Uhhh, why are you assuming that the night killer targeted Vinyl on account of his inactivity? The way you post it makes it seem like you assume that the Killer is going to continue getting rid of inactive slots for us. That's a dangerous line of thinking. I think it's more likely that he targeted Vinyl because he was generally considered to be townie - Vult was the only one who had mentioned to find him scummy but he found no agreement. I will not assume that there is a killer who will consistently perform pro-town actions just because an inactive player died last Night and flipped scum. Unless we have reason to believe otherwise I'm going to assume that there is an SK who picks out slots that are generally considered townie by the majority.
Don't give me that crap. If you understand and agree with my line of thinking then just straight up speak out what it is you don't like about my interaction with Vult. Saying "you don't like it" with no follow-up to it [and actually followed by a direct contradiction] reeks of an excuse to jump a wagon later on so you can be like "yeah, I already had problems with that guy earlier!". You have to give me more than that.
For the love of gorf, can you please stop being so negative about other players?It's not weak, you're just bad at this game.
I'm sure I don't need to point out that this is posturing and not useful content.
I said that on Day 2, after I dropped Vinyl, after Vinyl had died, and after I had been in the game long enough to realize that I probably had more posts than Glyph and FF put together.
Unless I'm remembering wrong, that's the second or third time you've resorted to calling people stupid (or some synonym of that) and/or bad in this game. Does doing that help you as Town?
