I posted this in another thread, but i think i will post this here since it is relevant to what happened in these last days.
As for the Ballot, i think in retrospect it was NEVER intended for Smash 4, as that game was nearing completion. In reality it was always meant for Ultimate and future entries, but Sakurai and Iwata did not want to announce a new Smash during 2015 when Smash 4 was still getting DLC.
Yes that means they essentially LIED about it, and the proof is in the pudding:
1-
Years ago, a Smash 6 Job listing was found. it wasn't fake, as it was tracked to Bandai Namco themselves. Smash 6 didn't launch in 2015, but it launched development in 2015. This was confirmed by Sakurai himself, as he has stated Ultimate started development in 2015, just right after Smash 4 wrapped up development. The news of a new Smash game were hidden in plain sight, but almost everyone assumed it meant just the DLC or even was a mistake due to Smash 4 still being relatively new. You could argue that it was too soon for a new Smash game since Ultimate was announced just 2 years shy of Bayo's release as DLC, but you must remember that 64 and Melee's gap was just 2 years, that the Wii U was a failure so they needed a new "Main" System and probably wanted some Killer Apps released in the console's early life, and since Ultimate was gonna reuse a lot of assets (and Sakurai didn't have to worry about making a game for both platforms like he did with Smash 4) it made development easier, although some corners still had to be cut, namely Piranha Plant went from Base Game to DLC (notice how in Sora's presentation during the Video's intro, they group Piranha Plant with the Base Game newcomers instead of the DLC characters, plus he has a Entry in Palutena's Guidance and his own 50 second video in Smash Ultimate's website, which is reserved for Base Game characters)
2-
Bayo was found to be added 2 weeks into the Ballot, i'm just gonna let
@Omega Tyrant speak for himelf here:
I'm really far back and catching up now, but this is a common sentiment in this thread that Bayonetta won the ballot legit and people who suspect she didn't are treated as conspiracists. However there is objective evidence Bayonetta was planned from before the Ballot and it was used afterward to justify her inclusion; dataminers found that of the Mario slots added in 1.0.6, one has the same exact stats as Zero Suit Samus, which were gradually changed over time to what became Bayonetta (another of the Mario slots has the same stats as Ike which became Cloud, and then in 1.0.8 when the final Mario slot was added it also had the same stats as Ike, which became Corrin). 1.0.6 dropped only two weeks after the Ballot launched, meaning there was really no way the Ballot was actually used to decide Bayo, and it appears to have been a sham in deciding DLC, while its real purpose was to be used to get data for future games, as the Japanese page said it could be used for (or Sakurai was initially planning more DLC based on the Ballot but decided at some point to save everything for a new Smash and instead made up the stuff about Bayonetta being the "Ballot winner" to avoid having to admit it ended up being used for a new Smash game).
This information isn't easily sourced since you have to look through the data yourself, but it can found in fighter_param if you know how to do that, and all the prominent dataminers confirmed it.
If you wanna look into more detail, this is the thread where the post originates and Omega goes into more detail in later posts if you are interested.
It's not that "The Ballot was Rigged for Bayo", it's that "Bayonetta was always going to be in Smash 4, she was just a cover up for the Ballot in Smash 4 as it was actually going to be used for Ultimate all along"
This is why when Bayo "won", they put "AMONG REALIZABLE CHARACTERS" with an asterix. She was the highest voted character...............if you exclude all the other ones that likely had more votes than her because they were:
-****post votes like Shrek or North Korea.
-Characters that Sakurai coulnd't add in Smash 4 as that game ended prodcution so they were saved for the next game: Sora, the Belmonts, Ridley, K.Rool, Chrom, Dark Samus, and Banjo & Kazooie.
-Characters that had more votes than Bayo, but were passed over because Sakurai had the above mentioned characters as priority as he simply couldn't add everyone due to time and resource constraints: Waluigi, Bomberman, Dixie Kong and Geno.
Yeah, it looks kinda scummy in hindsight, but i understand this was a white lie (well, maybe gray). They simply couldn't announce a new Smash game that soon, they waited for the Ballot to end on October and start right in November. This also fits with the Comment of a Former Mojang developer, who said that Steve took 5 years to negotiate and develop. This comment was made in Early October of 2020, fitting riiiight in with the development beginning of Smash Ultimate, meaning that yes, they were negotiating characters like Steve and Sora well in advance.
as for Sora being the winner for real or not, this time i actually believe that this is the real deal. Unlike Bayo whose games have been cult following games at best and Smash is the most exposure she has had to the average consumer. Sora, on the other hand, has enough Starpower to be mainstream and be a likely choice for fans to vote for:
-Kingdom Hearts was the 10th best selling KH game on PS2, the best selling console of all time, and was the best selling new IP for that system, and in an era where Zoomer nostalgia is booming, you bet a lot of the current generation was or is into Kingdom Hearts.
-Disney exposure, it's no secret that Disney is what attracted most people to KH, and if Disney is in a good position, KH is probably too.
-During the Smash Ballot, KH hype was still at an all time high. In 2013 KH3 was announced which was probably THE biggest news of E3 2013 outside of Smash, as that game was becoming infamous in the same way Duke Nukem Forever was, it was in limbo. The only other games that i can think had such big impact on their reveals were FF7 Remake, The Last Guardian, Shenmue 3 and Final Fantasy XV, which all share the same issue of KH3 of being in development hell for a long time. Even if KH3 didn't lived up to the expectations of most people, the fact that it was released and was at least not a disaster compared to the likes of DKF is no small feat.
I do believe Sora was more voted than the likes of DS and Chrom, the Belmonts, K.Rool and Ridley as KH's fanbase is large and vocal, the ONLY character who i think could have gotten more votes was Steve, who im actually shocked hasn't been mentioned as a big ballot choice as Minecraft is the best selling game of all time. The only reason i can think of, is that Minecraft's fanbase while huge, wasn't vocal during 2015, the era when the Ballot happened.
This may be hard to believe, but during 2014-2017, Minecraft wasn't that popular, most of the fans that played that game moved on and would not revisit that game until a few years later in 2019 (the game's 10th anniversary). During the mid 2010's MC was seen as the "Cringe" game (what didn't help is that in the 2010's Cringe Culture was also big, you can thank Commentary channels like Leafy for that), in the same way Fortnite is seen today (this is all part of a larger phenomenon, called "
Popularity Polynomial") so during those days even if Minecraft was played by millions of people, those people were the silent majority that didn't even bothered to vote Steve on the Ballot, and the "Hardcore Gamers" either saw it as "Cringe" or if they did vote for Steve for the Ballot, it wasn't enough to outrank Sora. KH's fanbase and consumer base may not be as large as MC's, but they sure as Vocal and passionate, and 10 passionate fans can leave a bigger impact than a 100 consumers who play the game just because they like it or is the "popular thing".
What i am saying is tht if you think Steve's negative's reaction from certain fans back in 2020 were off, you don't wanna image how much more devisive he would have been during Smash 4 DLC.
So yeah, Sora won the Ballot.