Bruh this article LMAO
I can assure you Lloyd would not "break" the internet.
I've been trying to figure out why I dislike the "hype culture" surrounding potential Smash Bros. characters so much and this article finally helped me realize why that is.
This article is solely concerned with the immediate reactions that these characters would bring and gives little, if any, information about how these characters would actually function if they were added. Master Chief and Lloyd get a nice and vague "He has a lot of guns/two swords". Dante and Monster Hunter get a cool "I dunno, just look at MvC/Monster Hunter Rise". Crash gets literally nothing.
It feels like the author views Smash solely as Gaming's Hall of Fame, when the series has always been about so much more than that. If Smash really was just its roster, it wouldn't have lasted this long. Instead, its foundation lies in the unique gameplay that situates the characters and how said characters are translated into this new environment.
If you want an example of what Smash would be like without its solid gameplay, I think J-Stars Victory Vs. and
especially Jump Force are where to look. Both games bring some of the most iconic manga characters under one roof to duke it out but can't hold their appeal because the gameplay is an afterthought. Luffy vs. Naruto or Frieza vs. Dio aren't fun when the core gameplay is sluggish and makes the characters feel disconnected from their source material, no matter how "hype" those scenarios are on paper.
That's why it bothers me when someone throws out "lots of people know them, deserves to be in Smash, simple as" or "obscure, doesn't deserve to be in Smash, simple as" because it's largely missing the point of Smash Bros in the first place. Excitement over a character's inclusion fades quickly. Steve's inclusion broke Twitter for the first time in over a decade, no one gives a **** about the spectacle of this event 6 months later. Even Sakurai himself has acknowledged this, adding Sephiroth Challenge because he was frustrated by how quickly new characters fade into the background regardless of their identity.
This isn't to say people aren't allowed to like whatever they like for whatever reason, there are no gameplay merits to inclusions of big names, or all supporters of these characters don't care about the gameplay side of the equation. That would be silly. However, planning solely around reveals and hype is a shortsighted answer to a multivariate question.