In Brawl yes. Not this game.
...I don't know what you've been thinking, but Deku Nuts are still items in Smash 4.
All Special Moves should be offensive? News to me!
The majority are, actually. Defensive specials are
way more rare than offensive ones.
Yet Impa's compared her to Ghirahim, the game's assumed main antagonist till the end. Gotta say something.
....that still doesn't say anything. King K. Rool's trophy calls him the Bowser to DK's Mario, and yet he's not playable (yet, at least). Comparing to an AT is even less impressive than that.
's entire moveset is a stretch.
No, it isn't. Her Teleport is based on how she uses Deku Nuts to vanish in Ocarina of Time, she has various moves reflecting her athleticism and her entire theme is based on, guess what,
ninjas. Impa would either be a clone of Shiek with some magic properties or a Robin knockoff with some Shiek moves, not this badass want you claim her to be. Compare the people who recognize Impa to those who recognize King K. Rool, and there's the proof that she's obscure. Marth and Roy at least had a
massive Japanese franchise to them. Impa's another Zelda character, and not even one central to the series. It's like if I said
Funky Kong was more likely for Smash than King K.Rool!
A reccuring character is
NOT a central one. Lucina is a
central character to Awakening, but it's doubtful she'll be important to every game from now on.
Research is your friend, bias isn't.
Funny, coming from the Impa fanboy who claims she's "the only Zelda rep left", when we
DON'T EVEN HAVE A PROPER GANON YET. Give me the main villain over a side character, please. I'm at best ambivalent to Impa, but I'd bet my ass a lot more people would want a real Ganon
WAAAAAAY over Impa.
Just wtf is this 'analysis' of yours?
Stating the truth that a non-central character of an already well-represented franchise doesn't actually need to be in Smash. Give me Ridley or K.Rool please; at least then, they're both crowd-pleasers
and something for more under-appreciated franchises.