#HBC | ѕoup
The world is not beautiful, therefore it is.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,865
i showed them a picture and they were suddenly cool with it
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Soup, you're still a child at heart BECAUSE you're still a child.I'm kinda with xonar on this one. I never really was a movie sorta guy and I certainly don't find the appeal of most blockbusters out these days. I wasn't really going to go out of my way to see Man Of Steel but I remember all the hype surrounding it. I suppose I'm still a child at heart, more entertained with Old disney movies and light-hearted comedies.
Soup, you're still a child at heart BECAUSE you're still a child.
...Cyber ? Your not technically wrong though. In the perfect situation the relationship would start off non-physical / sexual until a point where it could turn into the physical an sexual side. I'd say the separation would be one of emotional connectivity. The person can mean more to you then a friend. Plus, i don't think it's "sex" that defines a relationship over a friendship, I think it's the physical presence in addition to all the feels an such. For example, I don't hug or really make physical contact with my girls who are friends, but with my girlfriend I've got my arm on her an the rest of it.So I don't really see how one COULD have a gf/bf over the internet. Meeting up regularly simply seems like it would be required.
Like, isn't sex kinda what defines a relationship? I mean, I know there's obviously more to it but if sex ain't happening then what's separating them from simply being a friend? Seems to me that the whole reason one would find a bf/gf was so that they could **** them. If you're just looking for someone to have non-sex based fun with then it sounds to me like you're just looking for a friend, and by extension wouldn't dating online just have to qualify as that?
Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff18 is legal adult in america lol
So I don't really see how one COULD have a gf/bf over the internet. Meeting up regularly simply seems like it would be required.
Like, isn't sex kinda what defines a relationship? I mean, I know there's obviously more to it but if sex ain't happening then what's separating them from simply being a friend? Seems to me that the whole reason one would find a bf/gf was so that they could **** them. If you're just looking for someone to have non-sex based fun with then it sounds to me like you're just looking for a friend, and by extension wouldn't dating online just have to qualify as that?
Gova, you are too pure for me to want to blemish you with my dirty ways.Sworddancer, you're never getting in my pants with that attitude. This relationship is over, we're no longer friends and I'm going to need you to replace out ASAP.
Then what does Soup?
let me be happy.
I can agree with this. I didn't hate it but when I walked out, I felt unsatisfied by it. It's a Nolan movie that isn't serious or deep enough to be a Nolan movie yet it doesn't have the tongue-in-cheek, goofy feel Marvel moves have while still attempting to develop their characters (coughcoughironman3cough).It definitely wasn't good.
Granted, it has a couple moments of brilliance. There are some great ideas in there. They just didn't have enough time to bake. Or they were baked by a baker whose true passion lies in sauce making. I'm losing the metaphor here, but the point is something turned an idea with potential into a bloated, incoherent mess of a movie.
dammit jerkus stop being right i want to like man of steel okay but marvel still holds my heart hostageSay what you will about Star Trek, but there's no denying some fundamentals—it's visually stunning, well-paced, and has likable characters.
Contrast that with Man of Steel. Visually impressive, but so high on its own special effects budget that it spends half of the movie just looking for reasons to destroy more buildings (seriously, there's a reason that a video estimating how much damage the final fight in Man of Steel would actually cause exists). It's two and half hours long and somehow it feels longer (like I said, they just bat each other around the city for the whole third act, which of course lacks a lot of drama since all of the characters involved in the fighting are impervious to most attacks; no one even bleeds). No real characters to speak of at all. Clark's emotional range slides between mild concern for others and self-hatred. Lois is smart and competent but still exists primarily to be rescued. Zod is just angry angry angry.
Like I said, there are parts that work, but as a whole, Man of Steel is a badly told story about characters I wouldn't care about if I weren't already familiar with them. On the flipside, Star Trek 2009 made me care about characters I never gave a **** about before, and continued that into the sequel.
/lawyered