"I know I make a lot more money than you but you don't get to eat food I buy because I want to spend less money"
said no one ever
said no one ever
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/famil132a-eng.htm"I know I make a lot more money than you but you don't get to eat food I buy because I want to spend less money"
said no one ever
It is really easy to spend only $40 a week on food. Why don't you do a little research yourself? It only takes a quick google search of "how much does the average canadian spend on groceries" to figure it out.Literally everyone I've talked to thinks the idea of your boneless chicken breasts for $10 lasting 6-8 meals is ludicrous
but okay
literally your own source says monthly food costs 400 dollars more than what you said it does
but okay
if you drink a gallon of water in an entire week and actually live off the African poverty amount of protein you've implied we clearly have extremely different lifestyles and nutritional needs
but okay
discussion over for sure
You probably should read it if you want to chime in, you're factually wrong to assume that's what I was doing.I didn't read the bulk of the argument Bardull but when you try to make a point about the someone's troubles with their financial/personal situations that boil down to 'lol just make more money dude' you're gonna need your clown shoes
I'm going by an average 2000 calorie daily diet. Of course, even if we are to assume that EE consumes mammoth proportions, I've read a few articles and reddit threads that suggest that heavy set body builders spend around $400 a month on food at max. He's already admitted to paying for his girlfriend's stuff, so I don't need to better spell out that he could better control his finances, pointing out that he spends too much on food was a means to prove to him that there are ways to better finance himself so that he can have time to intern.Bard are you going by the idea that suggested portion sizes or whatever are the literal exact amount necessary to live on? I didnt read your links but thats the only way i can see people living on as little as you suggest
Reading isn't your strong suit, as that statistic is representative of a HOUSEHOLD, Evil Weenie. The average household used for these statistics is 2.5. So, you take 665 / 2.5 = 266.Did you even read your own link? It said 7980 for the year. 7980 / 12 = 665
http://www.discoveryfinance.com/average-monthly-household-grocery-bill-canada.html
500-600 is the figure provided here
I'll pass on the math help bard obviously not your strong suit when you're trying to win an argument
I wasn't trying to change the nature of the debate, although I do think you shouldn't have been paying for your former GF's stuff if doing so was causing you to work 14 hours daily. Of course, that in itself was of a different nature; in a sense I already conceded that, under those circumstances, you would not have much time to intern, but you can not deny that working 14 hours daily is extreme, and that it's not necessary if you handle your finances better and not pay for all your lady's stuff.Uh, no. I said I was paying for all the groceries. Then you said I shouldn't have been. I point out the absurd logic of saying "you can't eat the food I buy because I want to spend less". You changed the nature of the debate into trying to prove that I couldn't have been spending what I said I was. And then that I was spending too much on myself, even though the idea of a man of my stature working the type of jobs that I do on 2000 calories a day is the most ridiculous **** I've ever heard in my life
and why are we even including the .5 in that division? Do children work in sweatshops to help mom and dad pay for the groceries or something?
I know, and if that's the circumstances you wanted to live under, that was your choice. Obviously there are moral constructs that people want to live in despite dealing with this sort of thing. Do you see why it is hard to have this debate while not inadvertently cutting the cardboard the wrong way?With that said I apologize for the snarky backhand, sincerely. But it boils my blood that you're trying to say you "proved" I spent too much money on myself because I didn't eat like a sedentary 120lbs office worker while doing the kind of hard physical labor you expect to see in movies about prison labor, every day
consider the fact that she made **** money at a **** job for **** hours but paid for a large amount of my smoking habit, for example, and 99% of our pet costs. she did what she could; what she could do wasn't much and I don't hold that against someone that was barely over 20 and had no postsecondary education when I was barely able to do what little I could
He said I was wrong, I said I was right, and we had a talk about it.Bard why are you even arguing this
Like, what's the point? Do you really think you can spend a few minutes on google and beat a Canadian in an argument abut what life in Canda is like? Do you really think that's relevant? Because you're looking like a dumb *** who thinks google makes him a genius whose google to solve everyone problems.
also not eating any turkey on thanksgiving it what ISIS wants
That's what happens when you bring yourself up as evidence for a debate. The other guy looks like a bad guy for saying "no, you're wrong" in the face of opposition because he says your financial decisions weren't imperative to your immediate financial future, even if it's true.uhh
bardull you're the ******* because it's ****ing clear that you've never struggled by the way you conduct yourself and you're trying to share wisdom about how to financially struggle less. the thought of spending 40 dollars of food a week is hilarious, especially if the price spike in canada is what it is. the fact that you can't comprehend the philosophy behind buying groceries for your even more struggling girlfriend is mind boggling. like
idk dude. im perplexed.
oh and for clarification the list of things you seem to lack empathy for goes on, i just choose not to continue cuz i'd rather touch myself.
this is "your counterargument to ee's personal anecdote." working part-time at best buy or target puts you below the poverty level. that makes you homeless. you lost.Work part-time at Best Buy/Target etc. and try to get some hours in weekly at a firm. Have some optimism.
I prefer consensus over an individual win.You keep acting like you "won" despite that you were bringing up national averages in the context of a specific situation.
If you want to say you proved the point that dumping my gf and moving into a ghetto apt because I wouldn't have to worry about her safety anymore or pay for anything would have solved my financial woes, okay, I will accept the objective fact that that is the case, but I was trying to live like a human being that wants to be with someone that makes me happy and not a rational choice robot.
funny enough a rational choice robot is pretty much how I"m living my life now. It is predictably kind of cold and empty but functional and going well enough despite the frustrating job market.
the most important thing this conversation has accomplished is reminding me of wal-mart's $10 chicken breasts because despite that I need to eat a ton of calories that's a pretty good price for 3.5-4 meals' worth of lean protein
(also I was going to just drop it but since you keep mentioning sedentary averages.... all I can say is why? I don't have a sedentary lifestyle, and didn't then, and pretty much never have as an adult. I have the polar opposite of a sedentary work/life situation, so it isn't relevant. And I don't know where you got your numbers btw but my buddy is a power lifter and he eats in the 4-6K per day range)
This is another misrepresentation. At that point in time, I wasn't immediately familiar with EE's situation as I predominantly skimmed his posts. I skimmed most of EE's stuff since I already tried telling him to be optimistic, but he kept dredging up the thread with his life situation and it was pretty depressing.no
that's what happens when you try and dispute somebody's life for its own sake
this is "your counterargument to ee's personal anecdote." working part-time at best buy or target puts you below the poverty level. that makes you homeless. you lost.
I'm sorry I'm not a sheep like you that doesn't uphold their beliefs and supports them with actual facts when someone says that you're wrong. Maybe if you read the conversation, you wouldn't chalk it up to "Bard is being a ****lord and wrong," like some of you have.
that's all you need to know in order to tell that moving from this situation to a part-time best buy job is homelessness."just bite the bullet and work for free"
I'd like to defer you to "deeply impoverished, deeply in debt, carrying more than 75% of the financial burden in a relationship/living expenses while working 14+hrs a day 6 days a week 2014 EE" and see how quickly he gets buttmangled and punches you in the face
Ok, I have a confession to make. I skimmed that half of the post and was addressing his current life schpeal regarding not having better opportunities. I ended up skimming most of his posts prior to our discussion since it was depressing to read and was responding to his current life situation. My intent was not to tell him to be homeless, lol.that's a lie
you knew this
that's all you need to know in order to tell that moving from this situation to a part-time best buy job is homelessness.
Not abandon, but holy **** dude, getting yourself in that much of a financial predicament is NOT good for your health, especially going at 14 hours DAILY in the job site. A change obviously needed to be made.Bard the fact that you're googling everything shows you had zero knowledge of this subject but decided to start arguing it anyways and then had to try and use the internet to supplant your lack of real life experiences and don't seem to think there's a problem doing that.
Bro you told him to abandon his girlfriend. It doesn't matter at all if you're actually right with your statistics because socially you're being a giant **** and 100% in the wrong and if you don't think social standards matter then go live in a cave
Nah, I read the posts after that first post, but missed the initial point and intent, which was a joke on your end. LOL!I did make a change. I'm in a completely different situation now. I don't like it any more, really, but it's better in many ways and worse in others. The whole crux of that argument/debate was on finding/working a solution WITHIN THAT situation, but I guess the only reason we even had a debate was skimming.
But for you to not even read my posts but feel compelled to argue the point while make flagrant presumptions about my situation and what I did or didn't do, that I didn't plan enough, to keep arguing and keep trying to find ways to make me wrong even though you weren't reading my posts, that's low as **** man. It really is.
but I regret the fact that this conversation started and have been trying to disengage it every few posts. Including the last one. And now this one.
Hey guys, you know who's hot? Esther Baxter. She has an 85 year old lady's name, but damn. Bardull knows what's up (actually though, we discussed this once)