Rajam
Smash Champion
Does someone here play Puerto Rico or in boardgamearena?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is all just very subjective. These factors are determined from a personal bias and perception of how you perceive their play. if you wanted to have a more truthful and more insightful listing of this, you would ask players to rate themselves. I know for certain that I myself notice my mistakes and my strengths more than the person next to me. It might sound backwards for someone to critique and rate themselves, but that's where discussion comes in and you offer feedback. The only way I can ever see something like this working in DGames is if it's treated this way. We don't need a tier list, but critique wouldn't be a bad thing. I know that's why you're interested in knowing where you would stand if one was ever made, and that's why I am too.How about just talking about each part of our play then, instead of ranking it with a dot? Look at this:
1.Being correctly read as town. ("Transparency")
2. Having accurate reads. ("Accuracy")
3. Actively working to get your top scumread lynched. ("Rhetoric")
4. Accurately judging which players can be lynched. ("Foresight")
5. Securing the best possible lynch when your top scumread can no longer be lynched ("Pragmatism")
Talk about those 5 things, a little in depth if possible. Same thing but it's not ranking you?
Took this from Hito on Mafiascum. I was searching this forever. Source: On Compromises.
this is where critique comes inwhile i can see those town numbers, even if i disagree at some points
get out of here with those scum numbers lmao
How I see myself:Townplay -
1. Transparency: ★★★☆☆
I get misread a lot to due my impulsive behavior at times and my enigmatic approach to games. I am very emotional about things I feel strongly about which can either waiver to my favor or cause me to get mislynched. If I managed to stop being hot-headed and approach games with more care and caution, I believe this wouldn't happen as much.
My opinion: Accurate
You've got trouble connecting to people because the idea of not being heard seems to scare you. You need to be as cooperative with people as you want them to be with you, and when, like Gheb said, good players give you a chance, you WILL be heard. But don't shut out people that don't see eye to eye with you when you're town man. That actually hurts your game man.
2. Having Accurate Reads: ★★★½
My reads are usually accurate, but I have an inherent problem to back down on something, feeling that I might be wrong. This isn't always the case however, and sometimes my enthusiastic tunnels and calls to get someone lynched is the right way to go. There isn't an instinctive balance to the two and I feel majority of the time, like others, I make mistakes. When I'm right however, I'm right. I've never done it an grand fashion but I do try and present cases at times if again, I feel really strong about something. I could improve having more accurate reads by being more conservative, yet sticking with my gut. I need to trust on my instincts more often. There's also the fact that I do gauge my reads a lot wholly on Meta, but it's a double-edged sword that only sometimes reaps results.
My opinion: * * *
Soup you're not the best at reading. I'll be frank about it. But that's only because your style that you naturally play to is restricted when you get pissy. When you don't have your blinders on you DO read better though.
3. Rhetoric: ★★★★☆
When I want something, I want something. I put my all into getting town to follow me, even if it's not in the most presentable fashion. Nobody can deny that I am not a vocal player and sometimes I feel this is my greatest strong point, even if it backfires on me sometimes. I make games centralize around me because of my approach and the way I present arguments. I will gladly tear someone down and rip into them if I need to, but recently I am trying to just learn to take a breather. I think letting everyone know where you want to go and what your reads are is great, but sometimes you're not needed and you don't need to carry the game on your shoulders. I will be damned if I don't try though sometimes.
My opinion: * * 1/2
Soup you need to relax. Alongside Rake, you are actually one of the few players that, when you're playing with a super brash rhetorical approach, literally make me enjoy the game less. You become so offended when what you want doesn't happen, and it makes me ask myself why you even bother playing the game. You don't need the lungs to convince people, you DO know how to articulate yourself.
4. Foresight: N/A
I think this is a weird thing to judge a player on honestly. The best lynch is characterized by what fits the situation, not what comes to instinct. Sure, the guy screaming "we must lynch inactives!!!" could very well be right, but it would also be wrong not to consider the players who are active. I think this is a silly thing to judge someone on, therefore I don't really have much of a personal opinion about it. I do what I think is right, whether it be going for inactives or something else.
Yea I'd say I gotta agree. It's situational.
5. Persuasion: ★★★★☆
A serious problem I've had in games before is that despite being on the right track, it was very hard to get people to agree with me. Lately, I feel that I don't struggle as much. Sure, there is times when I don't get the lynch I want, but I feel like people are interested in my opinions and lean on me at times. It's a good feeling, especially when I'm mafia.
My opinion: * * * 1/2
I agree with the description, but not 4 stars lol. When you're on you're on, and it makes me wanna bite on what you've got in store. But when you're off, well you make it hard to feel your townmates, which is honestly important.
6. Cooperation: ★★★★☆
I really do care about this game, maybe even a bit more than I should. I don't want to feel like I'm trying to figure things out on my own and I like to rely on other players as much as I like to rely on myself. I've never heard someone tell me that I'm not cooperative, which is why I probably blend so well as scum. There are times when I get a bit pissy with someone and tell them off, but I always always make sure I'm listening to the town and reading other arguments, not just mine.
My opinion: * * *
You definitely read and take towns opinions and thoughts to mind, I'll give you that. But it seems like you feel like you deserve to get what you want done. You don't. Nobody just does. You gotta earn that **** by playing to townies, and sometimes putting your top priorities aside and cooperating with other players. Be willing to trust, even if it's temporary. They need votes for what they want as much as you need em lol.
7. Flexibility: ★★☆☆☆
I am not flexible. I struggle under pressure and I do not handle situations that leave me uncomfortable well at all. I get very stressed and nervous, and sadly those nerves cause me to make mistakes or even get people on my back. I need to learn to be more flexible and take things with a grain of salt. I need to learn to not get so emotional and take everything personally. This is a serious fault with my play.
My opinion: * 1/2
Dude this is literally what you need to fix for your play. Cleaning your flexibility will sharpen every other category because you won't get caught up with dumb ****. People pressuring you as town is dumb **** because you're town, right? Well there's nothing you can do about them wanting to pressure you, cuz that's their prerogative. Read them when you interact, see if you can feel em and REASON with the person. They might just be reading wrong, and sometimes, they just are. But it can also be your fault as well, and if it is, reason with them. You're town, so your intentions ARE townie for doing things. If they don't budge, there's nothing you can really do about it. Oh an also your stiffness is what causes you to do dumb things. Don't do dumb things.
Scumplay -
1. Manipulation: ★★★★☆
I am a manipulative ******* when it comes to being scum. I might not always be pulling all the strings, but I know I can work something into my favor. A serious strong-point for me as scum is that I don't have to worry about being right, so I don't feel pressured into being wrong. This makes it easier for me to push fiction as facts and cause mislynches because I don't have the pressure townies do to be right, I just have to make someone look worse than me. I believe I am not the best however, and players like EE are much better than me. Maybe I'll get there someday.
My opinion: * * * 1/2
You're good. Don't get it twisted. But you're not that good.
2. Presentation: ★★★★☆
My presentation is good, but that's because I only know myself so well. I feel there is a hole on my presentation and that's I tend to not get heated and I don't tend to push things so assertively as scum, but I've listened and I will be patching that up soon, so don't take that as a tell for too long.
My opinion: * * * 1/2
I think your presentation suffers because when you play as scum, you don't get offended when people think you're wrong since, like you said, you don't need to worry about being right or wrong. That actually comes off as weird, truth be told. Your connection to Nabe and your off looking play upon a reread in Luigis made me scum read you on Nabes flip, and me n marshy were gonna push both you AND AM simultaneously because you both fit the bill as scum to us. But we died so grats on that move lol.
3. Emulation: ★★★★★
As mentioned before, I know myself well. I know what people look in me to town-read me. I know what people want out of me. I know what I would do in a situation as town. It might be hard for someone to do the same, but for me it comes naturally. I never feel pressured as scum. I always feel relaxed, and maybe this is just recent. There have been times where I've flipped, but most of those are with a purpose to get people to town-read me. I pull out my Meta in situations that don't look favorable to me, because my Meta has become typical. This is probably why I emulate so well as scum, because people expect certain things out of me, and since I'm only concerned with how I look, I usually can appeal to what they're looking out of me. I feel I might be a bit big-headed when it comes to my bragging on things like this, but...
My opinion: * * * *
You look and play almost the same as town and scum. That's good. I've said it plenty but it's that emotional side of your town play that makes your overall play suffer, as it does here. You can't emulate that raw pissiness because you don't feel it. But you make it not a huge issue in your scum games, and if you eliminated that from your play you'd almost surely look identical.
4. Confidence: ★★★★★
A reason why I brag about these things is because I have confidence in my scum-play. There are some people who either don't try enough to be town, or try too hard to be town. I don't feel like that and I always come into my scum-games feeling like I have a lot to work with. It's so weird because compared to my townplay, I'm not nearly as confident. I've heard someone tell me that I play like town when I'm scum and I play like scum when I'm town. It's probably true.
My opinion: * * * *
Soup your confidence is good, but I think you're pretty arrogant about how good you think you are. Think more about the fact that you actually can be caught, cuz you leave paper trails behind.
5. Distancing/Bussing: ★★★☆☆
I think I distance well with my partners, but I feel sometimes that it's obvious. My distancing with Dabuz only worked well because he responded well in Luigi's Mansion. I think that if I don't have a good partner to carry out my plans then it will blow up in my face. I am not afraid to bus my partners if needed, but I also think that I shouldn't be so willing to just call them scum. They're my partners and it would be best if I didn't treat them like an obstacle or just dead weight. There are times when bussing comes into play and is great to get some town-cred, but I digress.
My opinion: * * 1/2
You gotta recognize when, as a townie, it'd make sense to scum read your partners. If they're playing townie and well, why force that? If they're playing noticeably scummy, why ignore that? As much as you need to work together, the thread is a totally different world than the QT.
6. Teamwork: ★★★½
This really depends on who I'm with on my team. I tend to try and tell my partner what I'm doing and how I'm going to approach things, but sometimes I make decisions on my own without prior notice. This is fine however, feeling like I focused on a plan instead of just doing what's best for me, I would be caught more often.
My opinion: Accurate
You're a good scum mate to play with. You know how to be bussed and you know how to play your own role. You just need read my analysis of #5 to bus them better.
7. Skepticism: ★★★½
Skepticism is how townies look at you, and how they feel about you. You could be presenting yourself well and doing townie things, but there could always be a person to oppose you and say that there's a hole in your play. This is a problem I feel will become an issue in later games, as I feel people won't be willing to town-read me as easily and be more cautious with me. Players like marshy work better with their skepticism because their play as town demands just as much. It's why he can get away with so much as scum, because nobody questions his actions and just puts it down as 'marshy being marshy'. I am not the same however.
My opinion: Accurate
Your self analysis was good stuff
I typed a lot. Nobody will read that besides some curious people, but I would be delighted to see what others think of themselves too. It's why I layed this out, and if people wanna agree or disagree with my perception of me, then feel free to do so.
This is actually really good and I would love to see it more in games. I'll try and implement it in mine.if you want to improve, start collecting data.
Have every mod of every game force each player to put a reads list of "Non-town" and "Town" into a PM with their Night Actions (or lack thereof) before the next phase can begin.
Rate each player's success rate as a %. N1, 12 players remain, 91.6% success means you got all but one alignment correct.
Compile the success rate on N1, N2, N3, etc. for each player and then have "average success rate" for each phases to determine how good you are at determining alignment and how much you improve as time goes on.
After a few months of this, you'll be able to determine realistically whose reads improve the most, who suffers with larger numbers, who is always wrong, who is always right, etc., etc. and you can then just read their games and emulate their play.
But no one will do this because they prefer arbitrary star ratings because actual measurable success is scary.
does anyone see this ****I've been meaning to see how you see yourself in games and I've been meaning to critique you for a while. You remind me of myself in a lot of aspects and I see just a ton of potential waiting to be realized.
See, it's this vague stuff that people love to cling to. "Well, I didn't get my reads right but when I DO, hoo boy town'll follow me" and whatnot.I fail to see what's so good about it. Its obvious advantage is that it's factual but it only covers a fraction of a player's performance and doesn't necessarily reflect the "quality" of ones play.
This whole rating thing is quite silly in general though imo.
???????does anyone see this ****
i mean
anyone?
There's quite a bunch of people in dGames who struggle at posting a coherent, meaningful sentence. There's even less people who are capable of writing a coherent, meaningful post. And don't even get me started on how low the amount of people is who are actually capable of laying out their thought process in clearly understandable words or of those that can actually produce a convincing argument. Do you think it's coincidence that dGames relies so heavily on meta in order to "read" players? You're way wrong if you think so.Also @Gheb's snide 3 star remark: I don't believe that's true. Overall 2 1/2 stars is what I feel is totally average in any given trait, and being average at rhetoric doesn't mean that you win half the time lose half the time, but that your arguments lead somewhere half the time and don't half the time.
There's quite a bunch of people in dGames who struggle at posting a coherent, meaningful sentence. There's even less people who are capable of writing a coherent, meaningful post. And don't even get me started on how low the amount of people is who are actually capable of laying out their thought process in clearly understandable words or of those that can actually produce a convincing argument. Do you think it's coincidence that dGames relies so heavily on meta in order to "read" players? You're way wrong if you think so.
Yo dawg, I've been waiting for you to self-evaluate yourself and I've been meaning to critique you on that evaluation since you joined. You remind me of me before I fully became me and I see a lot of potential in you because I see the me that grew into me inside you.does anyone see this ****
i mean
anyone?