Quick summary because we shouldn’t all assume everyone knows everyone’s history.
xkcd – bessie, LaserGuy, Sabrar, somitomi, Wam
Dgames – FrozenFlame, Gorf, Maven, Swiss, Eido (newbie)
MTGS – fontisian
I don’t think that anyone is necessarily missing anything. It’s still relatively early in the game and we’re in our information gathering stage. +0
Yeah I can be dense when it comes to jokes; no one gets mine, and others often go over my head. Perhaps the dashes would have made it clearer. +0
We probably did discuss this before and I forgot about it; my encyclopedic memory for old mafia games seems to have been something distinctive to xkcd and has not carried over as well to this site. Restoring a point. +1
Noted. +0
Ok.
@Eido , can you react to
#201 and confirm that those are your thoughts?
In my daily catchup posts, I am looking at the trees, as I have explained multiple times. On weekdays I don’t have time to appreciate the beauty of the forest. And if it looks like I am being more nitpicky with Eido, it is because I have found more to nitpick from Eido. -1
I think it is important that none of us lose sight that this is why we are here. +0
Original request for reference #210:
Refer to
this post (from the most recent game on this forum) where LaserGuy is referring to my opening, you can read through the thread a bit I think LaserGuy explains this later.
I could find some more examples from this forum (as town and as scum) but the games are long and the search feature not very good. Also, as stated before, I don’t seem to have the same recall I used to have.
There are some not too old games in the xkcd game archive, see
this post for a link to some old games I reconstructed from google cache. I would recommend Brooklyn 99 Mafia, please refer to Zenii’s reply on the bottom of Page 5 to my OP. It is also the easiest in format to read (it’s the only game I had in screenshots). If you want an amusing read, I would recommend Newbie New Year for the interaction between BoomFrog and Hari Seldon. It’s also a good example the classic bessie/LaserGuy conflict.
Side note, you have no idea how deeply it pains me not to be able to give you some more recent examples from xkcd, but the
most recent mostly archived game in the Wayback Machine is from 2017. It is a favorite of mine if you want to skim it, I am town.
I don’t know that Eido is town, why would you expect me to have this point of view? +0
Overall good content post. +1
#237 Valid response by fonti to LaserGuy. +1
If there’s one thing I find more suspicious than LAMIST posts, it’s “would I do that as scum” posts. -1
It just feels more like you’re trying to manage everyone’s perceptions, not expectations. -1
Eido if time management is an issue, why are you bothering with old games? Quit trying to figure people out by comparing them to past performance, looking for magic meta tells. I sometimes use meta in my reads, but it’s with people I know and have been playing with for a while (and I can link to a post that is clear in my memory without hours of searching). And even then I feel meta reads are very unreliable especially with experienced players. And I never use a scum or town tell as a
basis for a read because I find magic tells are more often wrong then right (reference Newbie New Year Mafia). -1
I’ve only known three players that possess the magic gift, and none of them are in this game. Though I kinda wonder about fonti.
I kinda liked this post at first, but what ruined it was Eido using the excuse that he didn’t have a recent Gorf scum game to compare and using that as a hedge for a wrong read. +1-1
Hahaha I don’t need to use any of Gorf’s observations as a basis for making a read. All my content is based on my own independent thoughts and I have been transparent about my methods. -1
I’ve explained this. I’m in my information gathering stage. I do not have time on weekdays to make comprehensive analysis of the thread content as a whole. And I’ve also explained how my point system is skewed and why. What makes you think you look
extremely bad to me and why? You’re projecting a thought you think I have, and it is telling. -1
Just because Gorf and Swiss are thinking something, why would that influence me from making a objective read? +0
I don’t vote “early and often”. This is very well documented (I won’t pull out any of a dozen references because it is a dead end for you to read a dozen old games just to confirm this), but this is easily confirmable by many other players in this game, and it is NAI. +0
LaserGuy
@Sabrar
Wam
@somitomi
fontisian
Can at least two of you confirm this (two being the minimum number needed so that at least one of them is not a possible partner of scum!me)?
You’re again hmm forgetting what I have previously explained about my point system, refer to
#195 and
#231 . +0
In my daily readthrough, I haven’t found much in Wam’s content that I have noted. Why should I be forcing reads? -1
Really I think you should concentrate on content in this game. +0
I agree with this. +1
#252 This is a much better post from Eido than what he has been doing. +1
What you can do about it is you can answer them. And I haven’t asked you very many. Can you answer just the questions in
#102 and I withdraw any questions in #195. And please answer the questions in this post. +0
Not from a new player, with little meta info on the other players, that has to read games he didn’t play to get meta information. -1
Agree completely. +1
As I went in to a little already in this post, the daily catchup is a bunch of small points and I haven’t really been forming overall comprehensive analysis in my mind yet. But I think that this is a good suggestion, and I’ll work on maybe doing a separate summary of points. I’ve just been a bit overwhelmed this week. I also tried to trim the quotes a bit more in this post. +0
Eido -14-4 => -18
Fontisian -8+0 => -8
Gorf +3+2 => +5
LaserGuy +1+0 => +1
Maven89 +1+0 => +1
Sabrar +4+0 => +4
Somitomi 0+0 => 0
Swiss +2+0 => +2
Wam -2+0 => -2