#HBC | Red Ryu
Red Fox Warrior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2008
- Messages
- 27,486
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- NNID
- RedRyu_Smash
- 3DS FC
- 0344-9312-3352
Well I'll see what you got here so far, but as it stands I'm siding with lynching July.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
AFTER I CATCH-UP SEXY </3Yo soup, we still tag teaming this *****? Lesss do et
I don't like this post, not one bit.Really? REALLY? Bull****.
Vote: Red Ryu
I'm Lavi, Vanilla Order Member. Either someone is messing with your read or you are lying, but either way I'm town and that result is bull.
As for WL, I want to know how all of a sudden with aa's town flip Gord and I suddenly look guilty, because clearly him being suspicious was just a figment of 7 people's imagination. He was ****ing scummy and will stand behind that lynch completely.
AND I'm still freaking posting from wherever I can get wifi until at least tomorrow so until then I don't have time to reread the thread and look for reasons RR wants me lynched.
Also I'm a girl, not a big deal but you know adding insult to injury as I try to figure out how in the hell you got a guilty on me ;-;
what the **** are you doingGordito said:Obtw there's way more of a connection between ****** and July than me and July.
all you said about july isObtw there's way more of a connection between ****** and July than me and July. I took a firm stance and reasoning behind my (obviously wrong, but hey who knows if it's miller/insane (but unlikely if the dude's the main char)) read on July, while the Gheb side said that she's not playing like how she did in Pizza so it's all good.
blah blah blah blah all up in my ear blah blah blah all i ever hearIn my first post after I saw your "guilty" on me I considered both options, and just from pure experience it seems a LOT more likely that a wrongful guilty is the product of lying scum rather than a manipulative or redirective role, in fact I'm not sure I've ever played in a game with a redirective role so from experience I suspected you were scum. But I never crumbed anything or pretended to be a pr Day 1, so I don't see any reason you would want to fake a guilty on me and screw yourself over.
Experience lead me to believe that you were scum, but that doesn't make sense here, at the beginning of D2 and no reason to push for me other than a "guilty" on me. It was fair for me to suspect foul play on your part at first because I know you are wrong, and I also haven't had a very good read on you all game. Also I didn't know the flavor so that didn't mean anything to me, but common sense says you really are the cop. So it has to be a manipulative role, something that redirects or flips the results or something.
Also, is your sanity guaranteed?
July said:If you are scum you have no reason to fake a guilty on me, there is no reason for you to fake a guilty on a vt, which means that someone messed with your results.
First of all, I didn't say anything about July because I didn't post more than on two occasions yesterDay. And even if that was the case your argument makes very little sense. Taking a "firm" stance sounds nice but adds really little to the connection between you two - and if there's one thing I've learned from being scumbuddies with her in Pizza it's that she likes to give her buddies pro-town credit, something she has been doing to you constantly. A "firm" stance is easily taken - fake or not - especially when you're scum and already know who's trustworthy or not. In the face of these facts your points hold little weight.I took a firm stance and reasoning behind my (obviously wrong, but hey who knows if it's miller/insane (but unlikely if the dude's the main char)) read on July, while the Gheb side said that she's not playing like how she did in Pizza so it's all good.
Compared to IR's response this is very very weak.Man I skimmed. I'll reread/vote July after I see a votecount.
Obtw there's way more of a connection between ****** and July than me and July. I took a firm stance and reasoning behind my (obviously wrong, but hey who knows if it's miller/insane (but unlikely if the dude's the main char)) read on July, while the Gheb side said that she's not playing like how she did in Pizza so it's all good.
July's obv our lynch. But upon a scum flip ******'s next.
What are you talking about with my "sudden turn" and "push" on WL. I asked WL why suddenly Gord and I were most suspicious people on aa's wagon, when WL hadn't suspected either of us yesterDay but that was the first thing he said. I wasn't inferring he was scum, but I want to know where that read came from all of a sudden, as it came before RR's "guilty" on me.I don't like this post, not one bit.
It's got alot of uneeded frustration and that sudden turn on WL, i find the turn to be most disturbing quota my bold.
because you instigated the attack full-force, you stood by it and merely directed with gord on aa, and saying all of the sudden looking guilty is another contradiction because hun, you are guilty.
and why the push on WL all of the sudden? explain how WL, not you and gord, are the guilty party instead.
So there.I lost my connection. I've had a town read on WL since D1, so unless you really have a bombshell then I don't see that read changing.
Kk, so explain to me then...why would scum RR decide that on D2, when absolutely no one suspects him, he's going to fake claim cop, fake a guilty on a townie, who was somewhat suspected and would have clearly been easy to push a mislynch on anyways? What part of that would benefit him past toDay?![]()
"If you are scum you have no reason to fake a guilty on me"
![]()
Scum's job is to get townies mislynched, and not themselves.
"there is no reason for you to fake a guilty on a vt"
![]()
"which means someone messed with your results"
...vote: July
http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Grave_DiggerThe miller flipped yesterDay, so it could be inferred that there was a cop.
I can agree with this part, but...Maybe if they had thought I had soft claimed or crumbed a role elsewhere it would make sense but that's not the case since I'm vt.
Judging by your immediate reactions to the guilty, I doubt it.Red Ryu as cop seems legit, its the "guilty" that's wrong.
Agreed .Judging by your immediate reactions to the guilty, I doubt it.
first paragraph: blah blah blah blah.Because what does he gain by claiming a guilty on me the beginning of D2? The miller flipped yesterDay, so it could be inferred that there was a cop. If he were scum he would make that claim knowing that 1) he would out the real cop, which would be good for scum, and/or 2) He would push through my lynch because of a "guilty" and then upon my flip would have to talk his way out of his own lynch.
Part 1 has scum motivation to it but if he were scum, fake claiming for no reason and possibly getting counter-claimed by the real cop and getting himself lynched would cause him a lot more harm than good. Maybe if they had thought I had soft claimed or crumbed a role elsewhere it would make sense but that's not the case since I'm vt. And Part 2 is pretty self-explanatory.
Red Ryu as cop seems legit, its the "guilty" that's wrong.
AA's flip made you and Gorf look much worse.July said:What are you talking about with my "sudden turn" and "push" on WL. I asked WL why suddenly Gord and I were most suspicious people on aa's wagon, when WL hadn't suspected either of us yesterDay but that was the first thing he said. I wasn't inferring he was scum, but I want to know where that read came from all of a sudden, as it came before RR's "guilty" on me.
Do you want a cracker?http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Grave_Digger
I dunno why people are assuming there is a cop because of a grave digger. Just look at the role, it actually infers that there is a tracker and/or watcher.
Just do not follow this and lynch RR toMorrow because you will be lynching the cop just because his results are wrong, and you are not even willing to consider that, but you will need to toMorrow.if you flip town, RR is scum.
:logic:
Yeah, except that meta-reasoning is far from the only thing I hold against you. Your sudden flip on AA still remains unexplained and unjustified. Let's not sweep issues like that under the rug - just by itself a meta-case doesn't hold any water and you know that. Which is why the fact needs to be emphasized that there is *more* to the case than just meta. And anti-town behaviour in *combination* with meta is something completely different than just meta because you leave out an important - the most important - component of the current issue with you. Don't downplay this to a mere meta-case.If you guys are gonna say that I'm not lining up with my town meta as an argument, then at least check out my scum meta and see if it lines up. Ha, getting out of self meta by making you guys meta me. Like a bawss. But the point is that the meta argument is totally anulled. So don't use it.
So we should accept the fact that you "misread" her but our playerslot supposedly doing it is not OK [something you have not backed up yet]? When you have both been giving each other town-credit a lot? When your play has been quite anti-town regardless of any connection to July?And the only thing that I can say about my "connection" with July, is that I had a misread. Simple. And I trusted said misread.
Be more useless please? Seriously, you've literally spent two paragraphs to say nothing [or nothing that has been untackled so far] of relevance. Some wishy-wash on July and cop-outs for you to continue to be useless and not doing stuff. Still want you dead too.So, what are we doing toDay? Is anyone here actually considering lynching anyone besides July? We're most likely going to get a scum flip, and if not, then at worst we'll know that cop results can be messed with. Unless there are two miller variants in this game, which would just be evil.
It doesn't feel like we're getting much done. The only avenues of discussion I see right now that are worthwhile are why WL thinks July/Gord scumteam, and EBR's "bombshell" on WL... and also the case that I think he promised but hasn't done anything about..?
Read SoupvGorf as SvT. Thought AA and Soup were a scum team, realized it wasn't. Soup's still not impressing me but I have a town read on him. AA push was weird, spent all day buddying me in some form or another when I felt it was unnecessary. Didn't care for it, don't like it now. He's appealing to meta as an excuse to get out of his lynch.July said:@WL: You don't really have to elaborate now on me, if you would like to for Gord go ahead.
You're either reaching or misread. Either way this sentence is bulls***. The point I'm making about meta is that you can't use it as an argument against me if you're not going to look at both angles of my meta.WL said:He's appealing to meta as an excuse to get out of his lynch.
Well duh. And in this case meta in general hold absolutely no water, even as a lead.****** said:Yeah, except that meta-reasoning is far from the only thing I hold against you. Your sudden flip on AA still remains unexplained and unjustified. Let's not sweep issues like that under the rug - just by itself a meta-case doesn't hold any water and you know that.
Did I skim? Cuz I was pre' sure that the July-me scum team connection was what was really in question.****** said:Which is why the fact needs to be emphasized that there is *more* to the case than just meta. And anti-town behaviour in *combination* with meta is something completely different than just meta because you leave out an important - the most important - component of the current issue with you. Don't downplay this to a mere meta-case.
First of all there's no "supposedly". You totally called her not scum (based almost purely off of meta, mind you) too.****** said:So we should accept the fact that you "misread" her but our playerslot supposedly doing it is not OK [something you have not backed up yet]? When you have both been giving each other town-credit a lot? When your play has been quite anti-town regardless of any connection to July?
So I never justified my town read on her? Maybe you should read back and find where I did.****** said:Even if you have had a "misread" as town you should be able to explain in retrospect what your thought process was and what affected your read on her that gave you pro-town vibes. Just saying "oh welp I thought she's town herpaderp deal with it ololol" isn't really adding anything against the issues I have with you.