And a new fat mustachioed Italian man, too. Can't forget one of them.Don't forget a new StarFox character. After all, we've seen a new one every game.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
And a new fat mustachioed Italian man, too. Can't forget one of them.Don't forget a new StarFox character. After all, we've seen a new one every game.
Waaa.....Why is there a noticeable lack of awesome purple antagonists? Mewtwo is close enough, I suppose.
Likely for the same reasons they got some work done on Doc before sending him to the scrap heap. They were going to keep representation equal on the CSS, and Mewtwo didn't pan out as they'd hoped, and they just ran out of time on the others, deeming them acceptable losses as they were clones. And you're right, it's the illusion of equality. Except now the curtain is pulled back because there are no more 2-in-1 or 3-in-1 characters. Lo and behold, a dearth of newcomer announcements, a smattering of veterans revealed, and suddenly the time crunch is setting in, and people are getting nervous.Yes, but...what exactly does that have to do with "slots"? If creating the illusion of equality between Mario and Pokemon was that big a deal to the team, why did they get a good chunk of development done on Mewtwo before deciding to allocate resources elsewhere?
Unless you're claiming that one day, out of the blue, the team had a collective epiphany to stop Mewtwo for the sake of "slot sanctity," the very fact that they planned him at all signifies that their jimmies were not rustled in the slightest by developing 7 Pokemon characters alongside 5 for Mario.
So basically your arbitrary pattern is arbitrarily more prominent than his pattern? Arbitrary.Which also just conicidentally reinforces the pattern. I don't believe this is coincidence though, it's something consciously being done.
That's never been an actionable pattern, nor is it the crux of my argument. The pattern I've observed is that Mario's presence on the CSS is either always dominant or shares for top. It NEVER gets exceeded.
Time is ticking if they want to work in those extraneous characters. But then, I've also put myself on the line as far as my 40-character belief. Nothing has changed that threatens that, in my opinion.
Your roster, it sucks!Waaa.....
If we want to bring up all the F7 including ones that weren't as complete as Mewtwo then we would haveDoesn't that just highlight how low-priority Mewtwo is then? If Sega can bully their lead mascot in at the last second and displace one of 'the most important Pokemon of its series', that kind of says to me that Mewtwo wasn't all that important in the long run, and they just gave up.
Plus, Doc was started too. That would have made it 5/4/5. Mario still unexceeded. Pattern still unbroken.
Did you ever think that they're keeping characters secret, like they did in Brawl?Likely for the same reasons they got some work done on Doc before sending him to the scrap heap. They were going to keep representation equal on the CSS, and Mewtwo didn't pan out as they'd hoped, and they just ran out of time on the others, deeming them acceptable losses as they were clones. And you're right, it's the illusion of equality. Except now the curtain is pulled back because there are no more 2-in-1 or 3-in-1 characters. Lo and behold, a dearth of newcomer announcements, a smattering of veterans revealed, and suddenly the time crunch is setting in, and people are getting nervous.
What is the basis for your 40-character roster forecast? I would be interested to know, as such a roster would be one character larger than Brawl's total roster.Time is ticking if they want to work in those extraneous characters. But then, I've also put myself on the line as far as my 40-character belief. Nothing has changed that threatens that, in my opinion.
Liked for the Post/Signature synergy.Zelda shouldn't even be on equal footing with Mario and Pokemon IMO.
But that's just me.
“It isn’t a matter of ‘if the next game has 50 characters, that’ll be enough.’ There is a certain charm to games that have huge casts of playable characters, but they tend to have issues with game balance and it becomes very difficult to fine-tune each character and have them all feel distinctive…. In terms of quantity, we’ve probably already reached the limit of what’s feasible. I think a change of direction may be what’s needed.”What is the basis for your 40-character roster forecast? I would be interested to know, as such a roster would be one character larger than Brawl's total roster.
You do realize that they've probably worked on the characters already, be they extraneous or not, and that they're not going to reveal all of them before release? For all we know, the game could have 100 characters.Time is ticking if they want to work in those extraneous characters. But then, I've also put myself on the line as far as my 40-character belief. Nothing has changed that threatens that, in my opinion.
It fits in the pattern, but the existence of a viable alternative explanation shows that this "pattern" theory is not absolute fact. And I would agree that it was consciously done; the put Sheik and Zero Suit Samus in the same slot as Zelda and Samus because they characters were tied together, and it made the most sense to put them together like that. That isn't coincidence, it is something that was consciously done, but I see little reason to suggest that it was to fit some fan made pattern.Which also just conicidentally reinforces the pattern. I don't believe this is coincidence though, it's something consciously being done.
Time is ticking if they want to work in those extraneous characters. But then, I've also put myself on the line as far as my 40-character belief. Nothing has changed that threatens that, in my opinion.
How dare you have a different opinion from me.Zelda shouldn't even be on equal footing with Mario and Pokemon IMO.
But that's just me.
That's completely irrelevant to the pattern I was speaking to. If the pattern was 'hey everyone seems to have the same ratio of reps', then yes, there could be an argument of "why doesn't SF get new reps if everyone else is?" The pattern is 'Mario does not get exceeded ever on the CSS'. That's undeniable. Count the boxes. Now that there are no more transformations, those boxes count for more. Sheik now fully counts as a separate Zelda rep. ZSS now a full Metroid rep. Charizard is his OWN Pokemon rep. Either with Jiggly's reveal(which would vindicate ANOTHER pattern, O12), or eventual discovery in main gameplay, the pattern holds for yet another iteration of Smash.So basically your arbitrary pattern is arbitrarily more prominent than his pattern? Arbitrary.
Your roster, it sucks!
To be honest I had that mindset for a while too. After that quote I was expecting low 40s, with lots of cuts for Brawl this game. But then we got the veterans that I expected to see cut if push came to shove plus relatively small characters for their series in the form of and , so now I expect a decent amount of Newcomers, probably putting us in low 50s.“It isn’t a matter of ‘if the next game has 50 characters, that’ll be enough.’ There is a certain charm to games that have huge casts of playable characters, but they tend to have issues with game balance and it becomes very difficult to fine-tune each character and have them all feel distinctive…. In terms of quantity, we’ve probably already reached the limit of what’s feasible. I think a change of direction may be what’s needed.”
Interpret that sentence as literal as you possibly can.
Well, considering the undeniable fact that Yoshi, Metroid, and F-Zero have always had the same number of slots (count the boxes), now that there are no more transformation, those boxes count for more.That's completely irrelevant to the pattern I was speaking to. If the pattern was 'hey everyone seems to have the same ratio of reps', then yes, there could be an argument of "why doesn't SF get new reps if everyone else is?" The pattern is 'Mario does not get exceeded ever on the CSS'. That's undeniable. Count the boxes. Now that there are no more transformations, those boxes count for more. Sheik now fully counts as a separate Zelda rep. ZSS now a full Metroid rep. Charizard is his OWN Pokemon rep. Either with Jiggly's reveal(which would vindicate ANOTHER pattern, O12), or eventual discovery in main gameplay, the pattern holds for yet another iteration of Smash.
Also, I have no idea where the 'your roster, it sucks' part of the quote came from, I cannot see it in Morbid's post. I'll chalk it up to Smashboards being weird.
I suppose it is undeniable, but that notion is negligible as the pattern is self defeating unless we are exclusively alluding to the character select screen. However, an instance of that would be confirmation bias.That's completely irrelevant to the pattern I was speaking to. If the pattern was 'hey everyone seems to have the same ratio of reps', then yes, there could be an argument of "why doesn't SF get new reps if everyone else is?" The pattern is 'Mario does not get exceeded ever on the CSS'. That's undeniable. Count the boxes. Now that there are no more transformations, those boxes count for more. Sheik now fully counts as a separate Zelda rep. ZSS now a full Metroid rep. Charizard is his OWN Pokemon rep. Either with Jiggly's reveal(which would vindicate ANOTHER pattern, O12), or eventual discovery in main gameplay, the pattern holds for yet another iteration of Smash.
Also, I have no idea where the 'your roster, it sucks' part of the quote came from, I cannot see it in Morbid's post. I'll chalk it up to Smashboards being weird(oh god the forums ITSELF hates me for my pattern ;.; ).
Personally prefer King K. Rool over Dixie, but Dixie is fine. Actually, both would be great.Okay, let's go a different route...
Thoughts?
I'd certainly say that excluding Ridley and King K. Rool (especially if we get no DK newcomers) is worthy of criticism. While I can understand Ridley's exclusion (due to being very difficult to develop), I literally see no good reasons to exclude K. Rool out of the playable roster other than "muh bias" from Sakurai. If we don't see a Donkey Kong newcomer, I'm not just going to say "It's Sakurai's will"; I am going to give criticism regarding it because I don't see any good justification for it.One thing I AM going to advise people on, is to brace themselves for the potential butthurt that will be a "No Ridley and K.Rool" roster. I can honestly see it happening, and I'm already over it. There are going to be a lot of people who are surprised at the idea that the "Two biggest newcomers" didn't make it.
Well, my only response to that, is that if we get Mewtwo, Palutena, and Shulk, along with Little Mac and Mega Man, that's 5 characters right there that people really wanted. Even if Palutena was a shoe-in this time because of Sakurai working on Uprising, Palutena still has a fanbase that is fairly larger than others. Shulk isn't necessarily a Top 5 newcomer choice, but he's up there. Mewtwo is the obvious most wanted guy. Little Mac and Mega Man are self explanatory. Sure, we got a few other we weren't expecting, but they aren't even bad.
What i'm saying is, that while Ridley and K.Rool may not make it, I don't see why the roster will be scrutinized to hell and back. It's shaping up to be a phenomenal game, and I can't wait to play it, with or without the Dynamic Duo.
I stated that not even a page ago. I completely agree. Mario and Pokémon should lead the way in terms of reps.Zelda shouldn't even be on equal footing with Mario and Pokemon IMO.
But that's just me.
I'm aware that @ EbonyRubberWolf may have used this quote (among other things) as the basis for a 40-character forecast.“It isn’t a matter of ‘if the next game has 50 characters, that’ll be enough.’ There is a certain charm to games that have huge casts of playable characters, but they tend to have issues with game balance and it becomes very difficult to fine-tune each character and have them all feel distinctive…. In terms of quantity, we’ve probably already reached the limit of what’s feasible. I think a change of direction may be what’s needed.”
Interpret that sentence as literal as you possibly can.
Because long story short, the absence of specific popular characters is not excused by the presence of specific other popular characters, especially when the absent ones are so comparatively massive. They shouldn't be looked at as though they're filling some form of quota...that would be like hypothetically saying, "Oh, you didn't get Diddy and Dedede in Brawl, but look, there's Sonic, Olimar, Pit, and Wario...why are you complaining??"Quite honestly, I'll only be mildly disappointed if Mewtwo doesn't make it. He completely deserves it, and there will be a ton of backlash if he doesn't, but I think the roster will be fantastic either way.
---
One thing I AM going to advise people on, is to brace themselves for the potential butthurt that will be a "No Ridley and K.Rool" roster. I can honestly see it happening, and I'm already over it. There are going to be a lot of people who are surprised at the idea that the "Two biggest newcomers" didn't make it.
Well, my only response to that, is that if we get Mewtwo, Palutena, and Shulk, along with Little Mac and Mega Man, that's 5 characters right there that people really wanted. Even if Palutena was a shoe-in this time because of Sakurai working on Uprising, Palutena still has a fanbase that is fairly larger than others. Shulk isn't necessarily a Top 5 newcomer choice, but he's up there. Mewtwo is the obvious most wanted guy. Little Mac and Mega Man are self explanatory. Sure, we got a few other we weren't expecting, but they aren't even bad.
What i'm saying is, that while Ridley and K.Rool may not make it, I don't see why the roster will be scrutinized to hell and back. It's shaping up to be a phenomenal game, and I can't wait to play it, with or without the Dynamic Duo.
Why not just have Pikmin lead the roster in terms of representatives? Why not?I stated that not even a page ago. I completely agree. Mario and Pokémon should lead the way in terms of reps.
I suppose it's workable if we include every individual type of Pikmin as its own character.Why not just have Pikmin lead the roster in terms of representatives? Why not?
How to represent Pikmin:Why not just have Pikmin lead the roster in terms of representatives? Why not?
I shouldn't be. o.O I can see his other posts just fine, just don't see that. Huh. >.>;Well, considering the undeniable fact that Yoshi, Metroid, and F-Zero have always had the same number of slots (count the boxes), now that there are no more transformation, those boxes count for more.
See the problem here?
Also, are you ignoring TumblrFamous? That might explain why you can't see his quote.
Pikmin? No, no, no. We need Bulborb, Hairy Bulborb, Orange Bulborb, Bulbmin, Emperor Bulblax and Empress Bulblax.I suppose it's workable if we include every individual type of Pikmin as its own character.
His moveset would probably revolve around Dr. Kawashima.
- and Solo @BluePikmin11
I broke into a cold sweat looking at this roster.I shouldn't be. o.O I can see his other posts just fine, just don't see that. Huh. >.>;
EDIT: Oh, wait, I'm stupid, it wasn't directed to me.
Here's the roster I envision, to clarify my thought process:
View attachment 15470
Green = Confirmed
Red = Unconfirmed Vet
Blue = Unconfirmed Newbie
(On second thought I could have swapped the positions of DK+Diddy with Yoshi+Wario and have it make a bit more sense. Hrm. V3, here I come!)
I'm gonna laugh when that's not the roster at all.I shouldn't be. o.O I can see his other posts just fine, just don't see that. Huh. >.>;
EDIT: Oh, wait, I'm stupid, it wasn't directed to me.
Here's the roster I envision, to clarify my thought process:
View attachment 15470
Green = Confirmed
Red = Unconfirmed Vet
Blue = Unconfirmed Newbie
(On second thought I could have swapped the positions of DK+Diddy with Yoshi+Wario and have it make a bit more sense. Hrm. V3, here I come!)
That quote is pertaining to the production staff of Brawl, that is not necessarily relevant to Smash 4.Sakurai has stated before that he and his team are going to add as many characters as the can cuz y'know, for the people, so I really wouldn't worry or even expect a roster the near same amount as Brawl. Plus, if they we're really that pressed for time then probably wouldn't have made it in if it wasn't for the production team.
https://miiverse.nintendo.net/posts/AYMHAAACAADMUKli5Hr24Q
If Lucario and Ike wasn't enough to prove that the roster will be bigger than Brawl's, I dunno what will.
...Yeah. Honestly, I can't see how you imagine this is possible. Numerous cuts, very few new characters, and only one more newcomer? And Chrom, of all things? I mean, if you're going to pick one newcomer, why not Palutena, who's a more popular request and practically a shoo-in now?I shouldn't be. o.O I can see his other posts just fine, just don't see that. Huh. >.>;
EDIT: Oh, wait, I'm stupid, it wasn't directed to me.
Here's the roster I envision, to clarify my thought process:
View attachment 15470
Green = Confirmed
Red = Unconfirmed Vet
Blue = Unconfirmed Newbie
(On second thought I could have swapped the positions of DK+Diddy with Yoshi+Wario and have it make a bit more sense. Hrm. V3, here I come!)
If it's Chrom of all characters, I'm not buying this game. That's one ugly roster.I shouldn't be. o.O I can see his other posts just fine, just don't see that. Huh. >.>;
EDIT: Oh, wait, I'm stupid, it wasn't directed to me.
Here's the roster I envision, to clarify my thought process:
View attachment 15470
Green = Confirmed
Red = Unconfirmed Vet
Blue = Unconfirmed Newbie
(On second thought I could have swapped the positions of DK+Diddy with Yoshi+Wario and have it make a bit more sense. Hrm. V3, here I come!)
Secret characters are veterans and we will get amazing veteran reveals at e3.Ebony, you mean to tell me that we're only getting one more newcomer?
Seriously. We have E3 coming up and likely 2 months between E3 and release.
Plus secret characters...
I am already laughing.I'm gonna laugh when that's not the roster at all.
I am breaking into a hot sweat looking at this roster.I broke into a cold sweat looking at this roster.
Every new game has around 12 newcomers, I don't understand why this person thinks we're only getting 7....Yeah. Honestly, I can't see how you imagine this is possible. Numerous cuts, very few new characters, and only one more newcomer? And Chrom, of all things? I mean, if you're going to pick one newcomer, why not Palutena, who's a more popular request and practically a shoo-in now?