Sausage Zeldas
Smash Apprentice
I mean, sure, her series has only sold 17 million copies compared to even Kirby's 33 million, but I've always considered Samus to be an important face of Nintendo. Am I in a minority there?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think its not what it means to us but what it means to Nintendo and to them a bigger franchise is the one that sells better.
I mean, sure, her series has only sold 17 million copies compared to even Kirby's 33 million, but I've always considered Samus to be an important face of Nintendo. Am I in a minority there?
I was talking more about this discussion going on right now, and the fact that no one really mentioned what I thought was an important series in a discussion about important serieseseses.I think its not what it means to us but what it means to Nintendo and to them a bigger franchise is the one that sells better.
I personally on that note then see them as the same size Kirby has sold about double Metroid but has about double the games.I was talking more about this discussion going on right now, and the fact that no one really mentioned what I thought was an important series in a discussion about important serieseseses.
Well there's a reason for all of that.So I've held off on bringing this up because I didn't want to be called a heretic...
But I've just seen enough this brought up that I feel like addressing it.
I've noticed many people say that there is apparently a "big three" in regards to the series in Smash bros. Those three are said to be "Mario, Zelda, and Pokémon."
Yeah, those three are most certainly the biggest in Nintendo...But here's a question...
...Why isn't Kirby a part of it or at least even close?
Yes, I know Donkey Kong has more sells, but this isn't about who deserves it. This is about who is being the most heavily promoted in a sense like they are a big deal. Whether is be through ads and/or the content they get in the game.
While Donkey Kong gets a nice amount of content and he is pretty big, Kirby is shown as way more important. I mean, just look at all the time he has been in the ads. There's also subspace where the Kirby characters all had important roles in Subspace. Kirby also usually gets a nice amount of content in the games. He has had plenty of stages and items in the past. They even added both King Dedede and Meta Knight in brawl.
But I know what you all are thinking. I can prove kirby is big and all, but what make him different then Donkey to say Pokémon? What makes me sure that he is considered as/almost as big as the "big three" in the eyes of Sakurai?
Well, again I must to say I can't prove Kirby deserves it or even 100% say that Kirby is considered as big as the big three. However, what I have seen over the years of Smash, I've noticed something with Kirby when it comes to the "big three" that makes him different from Donkey Kong. Hopefully through these pictures you will see just what I mean:
There are some more instances but you get the picture.
As you probably guessed, my point is that Kirby is often advertised with the "big three." This shows that he at least compares to the "big three."
So why did I bring this all up?
Well there's 3 main reasons.
1. If the Kirby series actually compares to the "big three," then the lack of Kirby content is suspicious.
2. Because I see the "big three" used in arguments all the time and I felt like showing people my side of the picture.
3. Because I was kinda tired of hearing people say that it was impossible for Kirby to get a 4th rep solely on the basis that Kirby compares more to starfox then the "big three." Do I think Kirby should get another rep just to get another rep? Of course not. I think the character I support has enough merit to justify it's inclusion. I'm just saying when ever I try to explain why I support a character and why he is justified, I don't want to immediately be shot down solely on the fact that apparently Kirby is "too small."
Now, am I saying Kirby WILL get a new character, tons of stages, a plentiful amount of items, and many an assist trophy? Nope. What I'm saying is that if we are consider how "big" a series as a basis for content getting in the game, then surely Kirby should be considered as well, and not be so heavily excluded.
You are not wrong in that, Nintendo clearly cares somewhat about metroid, I mean they released 8 metroid games in the past 2 console generations. Even though kirby has more sales it also has like double the games, so they are pretty much tied for 5th. Still it is not really about sales, its more about how much people like a character, the wii games sold a lot but I would not call the miis important to nintendo.
I mean, sure, her series has only sold 17 million copies compared to even Kirby's 33 million, but I've always considered Samus to be an important face of Nintendo. Am I in a minority there?
I just realized that both Mewtwo and Shulk are likely to be revealed, and are your two most wanted.My E3 Predictions:
Mewtwo
Pac-Man
Mii's
Snake
Wario
Meta Knight
Shulk
Not so much that all of them will be revealed, but I'm fairly confident in all of the ones I listed.
Quite honestly, I'll only be mildly disappointed if Mewtwo doesn't make it. He completely deserves it, and there will be a ton of backlash if he doesn't, but I think the roster will be fantastic either way.I just realized that both Mewtwo and Shulk are likely to be revealed, and are your two most wanted.
I agree with almost all of these, except for Mii. Sakurai needs more time to show off Mii's customizability, or else the reveal wouldn't even be worth it. I think that Mewtwo, Pac, and Shulk is a great line up for "newcomers" and that's pretty much what I'm expecting at the moment.
They would show him as a veteran of course, a returning one, "METWO RETURNS" is what I can already see. And what do you mean his days are over? they're just getting started.Honestly, I think Mewtwo's days are done. And I'm fine that.
To me he'd be one of the most underwhelming reveals they could have at E3. That is, if they try to play him up as a newcomer, which he isn't.
Because he's such an obvious veteran and it's really strange that he hasn't been revealed yet.I'm sorry, but, I just wanna know...Why does everyone think Wario is a Shoe-in for E3?
Ah, alright. His demand rised after Yoshi got confirmed, I guess.Because he's such an obvious veteran and it's really strange that he hasn't been revealed yet.
It makes sense, frankly.
Actually I have a feeling that Ness will be starter and Lucas will be unlockable.I'm expecting all of the "obvious" returners to be shown at E3, so that's at least Wario, Ice Climbers and MetaKnight. Starters-wise of course. Lucas maybe too, if he's still in.
Honestly I'm surprised we still haven't seen him. Actually, I'm surprised how little we know about returning characters.I'm sorry, but, I just wanna know...Why does everyone think Wario is a Shoe-in for E3?
Yeah, I'm a bit torn between Ness and Lucas... actually, I'm one of those who (dare I say it?) wouldn't mind if Lucas was cut, reverting Ness back to being the sole representative of Mother/Earthbound. But looking at how things have turned out for some other returning characters, Lucas will probably return. That said, one of the two will likely be a starter, in which case one of the two would be pretty likely to be shown with any other "obvious" returner. Guess my list for E3 veterans should thus be Wario, Ice Climbers, MetaKnight AND Lucas/Ness.Actually I have a feeling that Ness will be starter and Lucas will be unlockable.
Ness is the face of the series, and with the recent release of Earthbound on VC Lucas is no longer he most recent protagonist.
I actually want Lucas cut, and Ness to get his good attributes. But I'm in the minority there, and it's probably not happening.Yeah, I'm a bit torn between Ness and Lucas... actually, I'm one of those who (dare I say it?) wouldn't mind if Lucas was cut, reverting Ness back to being the sole representative of Mother/Earthbound. But looking at how things have turned out for some other returning characters, Lucas will probably return. That said, one of the two will likely be a starter, in which case one of the two would be pretty likely to be shown with any other "obvious" returner. Guess my list for E3 veterans should thus be Wario, Ice Climbers, MetaKnight AND Lucas/Ness.
and hopefully Snake.
Oh yes, everyone thought it was Mewtwo. I just thought it was strange that Mewtwo's psyenergy was blue... then the shocker.I'm not the biggest Mewtwo fan, and to be perfectly honest, I don't really want him in all that much...
But I'm 100% positive the Greninja trailer was supposed to foreshadow Mewtwo's return. The different shape of the hands, the lack of a backfin while Greninja is shadowed...
And I'm speaking as someone who couldn't care less about Pokemon.
I wasn't thinking, but if I had, I would have said the same thing.I caught up to it not being Mewtwo pretty quickly when I began to ask 'Why would Mewtwo be hanging upside?'
That's understandable, I generally don't even get extremely excitable even when it comes to characters. Though admittively when Greninja was revealed it did break me from my calm view to bursting out laughing.I wasn't thinking, but if I had, I would have said the same thing.