PKNinja95
Smash Ace
Not really a big Zelda fan so they can add whoever
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That isn't Mario. That's Jumpman. Look his clothes are different, and he's a carpenter. Mario is a plumber.Technically, Mario is from the DK series.
You know, there's a certain series that's supposed to be sequels of the original Donkey Kong series.That isn't Mario. That's Jumpman. Look his clothes are different, and he's a carpenter. Mario is a plumber.
Off topic, but I can't believe you missed Donkey Kong GB.You know, there's a certain series that's supposed to be sequels of the original Donkey Kong series.
Call it a hunch, but I think that might be Mario, considering "Jumpman" knows who Pauline is.
Forgot about that, actually.Off topic, but I can't believe you missed Donkey Kong GB.
View attachment 12308
That game is like a literal sequel, going through most of the original Donkey Kong levels and then moving on to other worlds.
----
So, they're split personalities of each other in the same body?And Wario, as removed as he is from the Mario series, is still basically the Mr. Hyde to Mario's Dr. Jekyll.
Regardless of what others may think, Yoshi, Donkey Kong, and Wario have interacted with Mario outside of the spin-off titles at least once, so they're still treated as being Mario Universe characters, even if they have their own franchises.Those are completely separate franchises in Sakurai's views, therefore are separate franchises to me!
Well, when your other choices are Rayman and Tails.I hope I'm on the good thread for this.
This is a survey from a large (non-smash) website. Please take a look:
View attachment 12312
4% Ridley... poor France...
As a Falco main, no. 8D And, quite frankly, I'm surprised that's all anybody had to say. The other picks are strictly more unusual than Falco.Scrap Falco for Wolf.
Why is Bayonetta so high?I hope I'm on the good thread for this.
This is a survey from a large (non-smash) website. "Which character should add Nintendo to SSB4?" Please take a look:
View attachment 12312
4% Ridley... poor France...
I think they had mistaken Smash Bros for Dead or Alive.Why is Bayonetta so high?
1) No, it's an IP from a non-Nintendo first party dev, Monolith. It's like FE or Kirby.I have some questions about Shulk
- Is Xenoblade Second Party?
- Does this mean Nintendo can lose the rights to Xenoblade
- What has Xenoblade done outside of mainstream installments (Ex: Cameos)
Xenoblade is first party as Nintendo owns Monolith Soft.I have some questions about Shulk
- Is Xenoblade Second Party?
- Does this mean Nintendo can lose the rights to Xenoblade
- What has Xenoblade done outside of mainstream installments (Ex: Cameos)
Actually, Monolith Soft IS owned by Nintendo, I just looked it up1) No, it's an IP from a non-Nintendo first party dev, Monolith. It's like FE or Kirby.
2) It's possible if they sell Monolith and Monolith retains the rights to the IP, but that situation is unlikely.
3) Nothing? It's only been around a few years.
Which makes it first party. Which is what N3ON said.Actually, Monolith Soft IS owned by Nintendo, I just looked it up
That's what a first-party developer is. A developer primarily/completely owned or part of the first-party (Nintendo).Actually, Monolith Soft IS owned by Nintendo, I just looked it up
N3ON said it's non-Nintendo. That was his mistakeWhich makes it first party. Which is what N3ON said.
So like during Nintendo 64 Era, Banjo-Kazooie was first party? Just curious.That's what a first-party developer is. A developer primarily/completely owned or part of the first-party (Nintendo).
It isn't Nintendo themselves, it's a company owned by Nintendo. Their IPs can be Nintendo IPs, as Nintendo owns the rights to software made by companies it owns but the company isn't Nintendo.N3ON said it's non-Nintendo. That was his mistake
NoSo like during Nintendo 64 Era, Banjo-Kazooie was first party? Just curious.
IPs made by Rare when they were with Nintendo were second-party, like Pokemon, as Nintendo did not own the majority of the company but did own partial rights to some of the IPs.So like during Nintendo 64 Era, Banjo-Kazooie was first party? Just curious.
No.
The thing I don't understand is why cut mewtwo just to add more semi-clones like wolf and Lucas? I would think that all unique characters would have taken priority. Were clones just easier to make, so they said "screw you Mewtwo"?Most of the evidence for Mewtwo's exclusion points to time constraints. Mewtwo's another character I really want in this game.
It's not funny, it's heartbreaking.It's funny.
If Nintendo hadn't sold Rare to Microsoft we most certainly would've gotten Banjo-Kazooie in Smash Bros by now.
I would agree with that, but i generally can't stand Ness, and love Lucas.He might dive a bit more deeply into the mother games for a different special moveset, also even though ness and lucas have alot of different normals they kind of play very similar which is something he may want to try and change.
I find your sense of humor to be dark and offensive.It's funny.
If Nintendo hadn't sold Rare to Microsoft we most certainly would've gotten Banjo-Kazooie in Smash Bros by now.
That was a typo.It's not funny, it's heartbreaking.
Probably one of the saddest legacies in Nintendo's history. I'd certainly be supporting him if he hadn't gotten sold off (then again, he probably would have already gotten in by now).It's not funny, it's heartbreaking.
hehehehehehehehehIt's not funny, it's heartbreaking.
I can't imagine not having got him in Brawl if he were still owned by Nintendo. Especially since Banjo-Threeie was in development for the Gamecube.Probably one of the saddest legacies in Nintendo's history. I'd certainly be supporting him if he hadn't gotten sold off (then again, he probably would have already gotten in by now).
Dangerous to have a post so devoid of content, laughing at Banjo's fate, and upsetting a mod.heheheheheheheheh
I honestly think it is funny; I mean Smash would be great with Banjo, but you have to admit that it is humorous. I wonder who we would be missing if Banjo was in the game (if anyone).That was a typo.
It really is awful.
It's even more hilarious how Microsoft has never actually actually used that IP because it wasn't Halo.I find your sense of humor to be dark and offensive.
They did use that IP. Very improperly.It's even more hilarious how Microsoft has never actually actually used that IP because it wasn't Halo.
Would it still be funny if M$ bought GF instead and Jiggs was yanked right out of Smash?I honestly think it is funny; I mean Smash would be great with Banjo, but you have to admit that it is humorous. I wonder who we would be missing if Banjo was in the game (if anyone).