Jason the Yoshi
Watching Me, Wanting Me
Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!How about my 60 roster for Smash 6, I wish XD
.n_n.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!How about my 60 roster for Smash 6, I wish XD
.n_n.
For me it needs to be Sheik, ZSS and Toon Link, there is no need to have the same character or persona if you like to represent the same being, I mean you can cut them and give their movesets to some new comers, their universe will not be lost because there is still their main forms and give space for new blood to take over with their universe, music, characters and items.That's where I foresee some trouble next game. Beyond Little Mac and Palutena, which other newcomers are going to stick around? Are Greninja, Chrom and the three shock characters (counting Villager because, based on that interview, Sakurai lumps him in with WFT) really going to become permanent Smash fixtures now? Something has to give, eventually.
It might depend much more on what is exactly happening in the future, more so then normal.That's where I foresee some trouble next game. Beyond Little Mac and Palutena, which other newcomers are going to stick around? Are Greninja, Chrom and the three shock characters (counting Villager because, based on that interview, Sakurai lumps him in with WFT) really going to become permanent Smash fixtures now? Something has to give, eventually.
*cough* Petey and King Boo *cough*I play Mario, but I'd be lying if I said there was anymore noteworthy characters from the main series beyond Bowser Jr.
Apparently it was necessary, which is why we have one. Necessity isn't an attribute relevant to Smash speculation. It is more likely than not, that Sakurai will want Wolf in Smash 4 (as he did in Melee, and Brawl, obviously). He is more important than Falco; although that isn't really material.What does being planned for Melee mean? Mewtwo was IN Melee and he was more unique than Wolf. Wolf really isn't that important and a third Star Fox character isn't really necessary. Nor is a third Fox Move character.
That's exactly why I think Krystal is guaranteedI feel like Wolf getting cut is inevitable. To be honest he is admittedly an expendable character, I don't mean to sound like one of those clone nazis, but I think from the view of Sakurai, a third character with Fox moves isn't THAT important won't be very high priority this time around. I think he was more of a fan demand character for Brawl and that his purpose has been fulfilled and thus might no longer be needed.
Unless Dark Link becomes one Zelda's new artstyle flavor of the month.I doubt a 2nd Link would ever be cut in future Smash titles.
I don't see much of a correlation.That's exactly why I think Krystal is guaranteed
Thats kind of jumping the gun without much Star Fox content revealed.That's exactly why I think Krystal is guaranteed
I need to see first Nintendo buying SEGA and wait for the final roster of this Smash to see how many cuts were made to make a response.Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!
I still don't get why Nintendo would buy SEGA.Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!
That is bad reasoning. Just because a character got in does NOT mean they were necessary.Apparently it was necessary, which is why we have one.
Mewtwo was planned for both, got in one, and was close to getting in the last. Wolf was CONSIDERED for Melee and the argument that he's more important than Falco is just absurd.Necessity isn't an attribute relevant to Smash speculation. It is more likely than not, that Sakurai will want Wolf in Smash 4 (as he did in Melee, and Brawl, obviously). He is more important than Falco; although that isn't really material.
Please do not request that I repeat stuff I already said. If you forgot please scroll up the page to read my previous posts. Also why do you say that because something was okay in Brawl that it's important now? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying if Roy was low priority in Brawl we wouldn't have gotten him in Melee. It's gibberish. Times change.Why do you think he is a likely omission? Give me a reason other than Star Fox's performance (which doesn't have a correlation to Smash; if it did, we wouldn't have gotten Wolf in the first place).
That works as well, hence me not listing Mega Man or Pacman definitively one way or the other.It might depend much more on what is exactly happening in the future, more so then normal.
Like for example if Chrom and Greninja are pushed to the sidelines and are considered old news, they may be scrapped. Alternatively, we get a character that is rather uninspiring or hated scrapped due to being the weakest link, or a character that won't get in due to copyright reasons in the case of third parties.
Well, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf. I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash BrosI don't see much of a correlation.
I think some people here would disagree with that. And if they're going to actually cut any of the Star Fox characters, I rather doubt that they'd get replaced by a character that's less important or even as recent as them.Well, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf. I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash Bros
I am not going back a page to read your posts; I could tell you to do the same. It just isn't going to happen, you didn't read everything I stated, I didn't read everything you asserted. So we can't really have a coherent debate.That is bad reasoning. Just because a character got in does NOT mean they were necessary.
Mewtwo was planned for both, got in one, and was close to getting in the last. Wolf was CONSIDERED for Melee and the argument that he's more important than Falco is just absurd.
Please do not request that I repeat stuff I already said. If you forgot please scroll up the page to read my previous posts. Also why do you say that because something was okay in Brawl that it's important now? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying if Roy was low priority in Brawl we wouldn't have gotten him in Melee. It's gibberish. Times change.
You think there'll be a 6th Smash game? How naive.Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!
Why wouldn't there be a 6th iteration of Smash? That doesn't even make sense.You think there'll be a 6th Smash game? How naive.
As for Wolf, I certainly don't want him gone, but I feel like him and Lucas are low on the priority list this time. I pray they don't get cut, but I'm staying rather optimistic.
nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.That's exactly why I think Krystal is guaranteed
I did notWell, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf.
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash Bros
What excellent timing you have!nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.
I did not
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
The funny thing is, I am pretty sure Saturn thinks Krystal would be a clone.Well, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf. I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash Bros
Nice timing!nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.
I did not
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
This guy says it all!I still don't get why Nintendo would buy SEGA.
Personally, I just don't see it happening. My baseless opinion.Why wouldn't there be a 6th iteration of Smash? That doesn't even make sense.
The only relevant reason anyone establishes is that Mother isn't a prominent Nintendo franchise; with 2 representatives it is disproportionate. It is fallacious reasoning that is self-referential incoherence, but most people agree, so it is considered "logic."I may not be a huge fan of the Mother franchise but...I kinda fail to see how Lucas would be cut/low priority other than some of his moves being similar to Ness'.
Keep in mind that Super Smash Bros. is a very notable gateway series, meaning whatever characters gets on the roster will automatically gain fame or notoriety. Which naturally causes a bit of a snafu over who should or shouldn't be cut. Wii Fit Trainer for example was a character very few knew even existed, but after being confirmed the character gained a lot of notoriety for her bizarre presence being all tongue in cheek and the character sported characteristics that attracted certain artists. Hell, characters like Captain Falcon feed off of Super Smash Bros. due to the lack of hope for future titles. Because of Super smash Bros. causing a sudden surge of popularity, removing a character becomes a lot more tricky. Even flavor of the month type characters like Greninja aren't guaranteed to be scrapped.That works as well, hence me not listing Mega Man or Pacman definitively one way or the other.
Arguably what we're seeing this go around is the prioritization of unique movesets at the expense of important characters. That's not to say there aren't important characters there, but there are fewer of them you can point to and confidently declare "That guy is never getting cut, they're too iconic" like you can with a lot of Brawl's newcomers. From now on, so long as the newcomers come with unique movesets, their identities may become far less important in the developers' eyes, for better or for worse.
Is that a Spongebob reference?Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
I suppose anything is better than Toon Zelda; I support.I've been thinking about the BEST zelda rep,
Based on popularity,the game's recogniztion,and finally,uniqueness.
After concluding the results,I think to myself,HOW COULD I,no,WE BE SO BLIND?!
View attachment 12265
First question you might ask : Why? Over Ghirahim and my non-legal waifu Tetra?
A : Sure,he may not be popular,but he's notable,used in memes,and is recognized in one of the most notable games in Nintendo history!
Second question : What makes him unique?
A : He could use items he sells,use that cardboard sword's beam as a projetile,you name it! He's got goods,he uses them
Final Question : What kind of weed you smokin'?
A : Chronic.
Soo....pretty much using a subjective opinion on how many reps a franchise people think it "Deserves".The only relevant reason anyone establishes is that Mother isn't a prominent Nintendo franchise; with 2 representatives it is disproportionate. It is fallacious reasoning that is self-referential incoherence, but most people agree, so it is considered "logic."
This guy was kinda just talking in circles. The only concrete thing he said was that Sonic and Mario have become "buddies".This guy says it all!
I'm still dissing the idea.This guy says it all!
...Krystal would not be a clone, dude. That staff she has in StarFox Adventures can make her extremely unique.nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.
I did not
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
That's the problem you run into with expanding Smash rosters...literally every character added into Smash develops a fanbase, even Pichu, but the Smash fanbase still wants a reasonably large selection of newcomers. We can count on, say, Game & Watch to make the jump because he's arguably the first shock character (unless you count, say, Ness in 64), but when the number of shock characters grows to four, five, six or more, it becomes tougher to count on all of those characters making the jump, simply because the initial reason for their selection is no longer unique to them.Keep in mind that Super Smash Bros. is a very notable gateway series, meaning whatever characters gets on the roster will automatically gain fame or notoriety. Which naturally causes a bit of a snafu over who should or shouldn't be cut. Wii Fit Trainer for example was a character very few knew even existed, but after being confirmed the character gained a lot of notoriety for her bizarre presence being all tongue in cheek and the character sported characteristics that attracted certain artists. Hell, characters like Captain Falcon feed off of Super Smash Bros. due to the lack of hope for future titles. Because of Super smash Bros. causing a sudden surge of popularity, removing a character becomes a lot more tricky. Even flavor of the month type characters like Greninja aren't guaranteed to be scrapped.
You never played Star Fox Adventures,did you?nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.
I did not
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
Please don't bring up the staff while SaturnGamer is around; he doesn't believe that she would be included with that staff, end of story!...Krystal would not be a clone, dude. That staff she has in StarFox Adventures can make her extremely unique.
He makes a ton of good points though. It can happen.This guy was kinda just talking in circles. The only concrete thing he said was that Sonic and Mario have become "buddies".
You cannot be serious about Sonic becoming a porn star if Nintendo buys SEGA! That's unthinkableI wouldn't by a company that said they would MAKE Sonic pornography.
I applaud your thinking, man...but we can't say for sure she won't be a clone. There is a slight chance that she could be one...but Rosalina happened & people judged her as "Half-baked Peach clone" before her reveal so what do I know?...Krystal would not be a clone, dude. That staff she has in StarFox Adventures can make her extremely unique.