• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Character Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zhadgon

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
1,849
Location
Chilangolandia
NNID
Zhadgon
That's where I foresee some trouble next game. Beyond Little Mac and Palutena, which other newcomers are going to stick around? Are Greninja, Chrom and the three shock characters (counting Villager because, based on that interview, Sakurai lumps him in with WFT) really going to become permanent Smash fixtures now? Something has to give, eventually.
For me it needs to be Sheik, ZSS and Toon Link, there is no need to have the same character or persona if you like to represent the same being, I mean you can cut them and give their movesets to some new comers, their universe will not be lost because there is still their main forms and give space for new blood to take over with their universe, music, characters and items.
.n_n.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
That's where I foresee some trouble next game. Beyond Little Mac and Palutena, which other newcomers are going to stick around? Are Greninja, Chrom and the three shock characters (counting Villager because, based on that interview, Sakurai lumps him in with WFT) really going to become permanent Smash fixtures now? Something has to give, eventually.
It might depend much more on what is exactly happening in the future, more so then normal.

Like for example if Chrom and Greninja are pushed to the sidelines and are considered old news, they may be scrapped. Alternatively, we get a character that is rather uninspiring or hated scrapped due to being the weakest link, or a character that won't get in due to copyright reasons in the case of third parties.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
What does being planned for Melee mean? Mewtwo was IN Melee and he was more unique than Wolf. Wolf really isn't that important and a third Star Fox character isn't really necessary. Nor is a third Fox Move character.
Apparently it was necessary, which is why we have one. Necessity isn't an attribute relevant to Smash speculation. It is more likely than not, that Sakurai will want Wolf in Smash 4 (as he did in Melee, and Brawl, obviously). He is more important than Falco; although that isn't really material.

Why do you think he is a likely omission? Give me a reason other than Star Fox's performance (which doesn't have a correlation to Smash; if it did, we wouldn't have gotten Wolf in the first place).

Edit- The Direct doesn't really apply to me; I predicted everything that happened in the Direct (except for Greninja) and I was hardly surprised by his inclusion either. He is the most logical; most people just grouped him with Kalos Trainer, that is why he seems obscure. In any event, being more unique doesn't guarantee his safety, it establishes that he has a different play-style. Removing that play-style is probably something that would deter Sakurai from removing the character.
 
Last edited:

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
I feel like Wolf getting cut is inevitable. To be honest he is admittedly an expendable character, I don't mean to sound like one of those clone nazis, but I think from the view of Sakurai, a third character with Fox moves isn't THAT important won't be very high priority this time around. I think he was more of a fan demand character for Brawl and that his purpose has been fulfilled and thus might no longer be needed.
That's exactly why I think Krystal is guaranteed
 

Zhadgon

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
1,849
Location
Chilangolandia
NNID
Zhadgon
Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!
I need to see first Nintendo buying SEGA and wait for the final roster of this Smash to see how many cuts were made to make a response.
.n_n.
 
Last edited:

TheLastJinjo

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
9,220
Location
Luigi
Apparently it was necessary, which is why we have one.
That is bad reasoning. Just because a character got in does NOT mean they were necessary.

Necessity isn't an attribute relevant to Smash speculation. It is more likely than not, that Sakurai will want Wolf in Smash 4 (as he did in Melee, and Brawl, obviously). He is more important than Falco; although that isn't really material.
Mewtwo was planned for both, got in one, and was close to getting in the last. Wolf was CONSIDERED for Melee and the argument that he's more important than Falco is just absurd.

Your arguments for Wolf are terrible because otherwise Mewtwo would be here and in Brawl for being present in Melee and having a unique move set.

Also Wolf was still lower priority in Brawl than Falco despite being more unique, so once again your argument is flawed.

Why do you think he is a likely omission? Give me a reason other than Star Fox's performance (which doesn't have a correlation to Smash; if it did, we wouldn't have gotten Wolf in the first place).
Please do not request that I repeat stuff I already said. If you forgot please scroll up the page to read my previous posts. Also why do you say that because something was okay in Brawl that it's important now? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying if Roy was low priority in Brawl we wouldn't have gotten him in Melee. It's gibberish. Times change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BKupa666

Barnacled Boss
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
7,788
Location
Toxic Tower
It might depend much more on what is exactly happening in the future, more so then normal.

Like for example if Chrom and Greninja are pushed to the sidelines and are considered old news, they may be scrapped. Alternatively, we get a character that is rather uninspiring or hated scrapped due to being the weakest link, or a character that won't get in due to copyright reasons in the case of third parties.
That works as well, hence me not listing Mega Man or Pacman definitively one way or the other.

Arguably what we're seeing this go around is the prioritization of unique movesets at the expense of important characters. That's not to say there aren't important characters there, but there are fewer of them you can point to and confidently declare "That guy is never getting cut, they're too iconic" like you can with a lot of Brawl's newcomers. From now on, so long as the newcomers come with unique movesets, their identities may become far less important in the developers' eyes, for better or for worse.
 
Last edited:

False Sense

Ad Astra Per Aspera
Joined
Jan 17, 2014
Messages
8,332
NNID
FalseSense
3DS FC
3368-2599-3209
Well, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf. I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash Bros
I think some people here would disagree with that. And if they're going to actually cut any of the Star Fox characters, I rather doubt that they'd get replaced by a character that's less important or even as recent as them.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
That is bad reasoning. Just because a character got in does NOT mean they were necessary.


Mewtwo was planned for both, got in one, and was close to getting in the last. Wolf was CONSIDERED for Melee and the argument that he's more important than Falco is just absurd.


Please do not request that I repeat stuff I already said. If you forgot please scroll up the page to read my previous posts. Also why do you say that because something was okay in Brawl that it's important now? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying if Roy was low priority in Brawl we wouldn't have gotten him in Melee. It's gibberish. Times change.
I am not going back a page to read your posts; I could tell you to do the same. It just isn't going to happen, you didn't read everything I stated, I didn't read everything you asserted. So we can't really have a coherent debate.
 

TumblrFamous

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
6,070
Location
Gainesville, Florida
Switch FC
SW-8429-6803-3691
Nah, by the sixth Smash Nintendo would've bought SEGA, and there's way too many cuts. That and it just looks off!
You think there'll be a 6th Smash game? How naive.

As for Wolf, I certainly don't want him gone, but I feel like him and Lucas are low on the priority list this time. I pray they don't get cut, but I'm staying rather optimistic.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
You think there'll be a 6th Smash game? How naive.

As for Wolf, I certainly don't want him gone, but I feel like him and Lucas are low on the priority list this time. I pray they don't get cut, but I'm staying rather optimistic.
Why wouldn't there be a 6th iteration of Smash? That doesn't even make sense.
 

TheLastJinjo

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
9,220
Location
Luigi
D

Deleted member

Guest
I may not be a huge fan of the Mother franchise but...I kinda fail to see how Lucas would be cut/low priority other than some of his moves being similar to Ness'.
 

SuperBrawler

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
3,239
Location
A Pineapple Under The Sea
Well, Saturn kinda made Wolf's disclusion being because he's a clone of Wolf. I agree to that on a small scale, but Krystal would be anything but a clone in Super Smash Bros
The funny thing is, I am pretty sure Saturn thinks Krystal would be a clone.

Plus, we all know:

Slippy>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Leon>>>>>>>>>>>>>Panther


EDIT: Ah, there it is!
nope, nope, nope SOOO much nope.


I did not


Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
Nice timing!
 
Last edited:

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I may not be a huge fan of the Mother franchise but...I kinda fail to see how Lucas would be cut/low priority other than some of his moves being similar to Ness'.
The only relevant reason anyone establishes is that Mother isn't a prominent Nintendo franchise; with 2 representatives it is disproportionate. It is fallacious reasoning that is self-referential incoherence, but most people agree, so it is considered "logic."
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
That works as well, hence me not listing Mega Man or Pacman definitively one way or the other.

Arguably what we're seeing this go around is the prioritization of unique movesets at the expense of important characters. That's not to say there aren't important characters there, but there are fewer of them you can point to and confidently declare "That guy is never getting cut, they're too iconic" like you can with a lot of Brawl's newcomers. From now on, so long as the newcomers come with unique movesets, their identities may become far less important in the developers' eyes, for better or for worse.
Keep in mind that Super Smash Bros. is a very notable gateway series, meaning whatever characters gets on the roster will automatically gain fame or notoriety. Which naturally causes a bit of a snafu over who should or shouldn't be cut. Wii Fit Trainer for example was a character very few knew even existed, but after being confirmed the character gained a lot of notoriety for her bizarre presence being all tongue in cheek and the character sported characteristics that attracted certain artists. Hell, characters like Captain Falcon feed off of Super Smash Bros. due to the lack of hope for future titles. Because of Super smash Bros. causing a sudden surge of popularity, removing a character becomes a lot more tricky. Even flavor of the month type characters like Greninja aren't guaranteed to be scrapped.
 
Last edited:

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,939
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
I've been thinking about the BEST zelda rep,

Based on popularity,the game's recogniztion,and finally,uniqueness.

After concluding the results,I think to myself,HOW COULD I,no,WE BE SO BLIND?!

000.jpg


First question you might ask : Why? Over Ghirahim and my non-legal waifu Tetra?
A : Sure,he may not be popular,but he's notable,used in memes,and is recognized in one of the most notable games in Nintendo history!

Second question : What makes him unique?
A : He could use items he sells,use that cardboard sword's beam as a projetile,you name it! He's got goods,he uses them

Final Question : What kind of weed you smokin'?
A : Chronic.
 

TumblrFamous

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
6,070
Location
Gainesville, Florida
Switch FC
SW-8429-6803-3691
Rev up those nopes! Cuz I am sure hungry for calling bull **** on that.
Is that a Spongebob reference?

I can honestly say that Krystal does have a chance of being a clone. Personally, I think we can all agree we'd rather a unique Krystal than another Fox clone, but there's a plausible chance she can be a clone (though I don't think it's a good idea).
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I've been thinking about the BEST zelda rep,

Based on popularity,the game's recogniztion,and finally,uniqueness.

After concluding the results,I think to myself,HOW COULD I,no,WE BE SO BLIND?!

View attachment 12265

First question you might ask : Why? Over Ghirahim and my non-legal waifu Tetra?
A : Sure,he may not be popular,but he's notable,used in memes,and is recognized in one of the most notable games in Nintendo history!

Second question : What makes him unique?
A : He could use items he sells,use that cardboard sword's beam as a projetile,you name it! He's got goods,he uses them

Final Question : What kind of weed you smokin'?
A : Chronic.
I suppose anything is better than Toon Zelda; I support.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
The only relevant reason anyone establishes is that Mother isn't a prominent Nintendo franchise; with 2 representatives it is disproportionate. It is fallacious reasoning that is self-referential incoherence, but most people agree, so it is considered "logic."
Soo....pretty much using a subjective opinion on how many reps a franchise people think it "Deserves".

Eh, guess its nothing new.
 

BKupa666

Barnacled Boss
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
7,788
Location
Toxic Tower
Keep in mind that Super Smash Bros. is a very notable gateway series, meaning whatever characters gets on the roster will automatically gain fame or notoriety. Which naturally causes a bit of a snafu over who should or shouldn't be cut. Wii Fit Trainer for example was a character very few knew even existed, but after being confirmed the character gained a lot of notoriety for her bizarre presence being all tongue in cheek and the character sported characteristics that attracted certain artists. Hell, characters like Captain Falcon feed off of Super Smash Bros. due to the lack of hope for future titles. Because of Super smash Bros. causing a sudden surge of popularity, removing a character becomes a lot more tricky. Even flavor of the month type characters like Greninja aren't guaranteed to be scrapped.
That's the problem you run into with expanding Smash rosters...literally every character added into Smash develops a fanbase, even Pichu, but the Smash fanbase still wants a reasonably large selection of newcomers. We can count on, say, Game & Watch to make the jump because he's arguably the first shock character (unless you count, say, Ness in 64), but when the number of shock characters grows to four, five, six or more, it becomes tougher to count on all of those characters making the jump, simply because the initial reason for their selection is no longer unique to them.

The solution, of course, would be to start collectively welcoming some characters as permanent staples and others as temporary treats, but that creates the additional snag of everyone wanting their favorite to be the former and no one wanting their character to be the latter.
 
Last edited:

TumblrFamous

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
6,070
Location
Gainesville, Florida
Switch FC
SW-8429-6803-3691
I don't think Krystal in Starfox Adventures means anything. If Sakurai wants to give her a staff, he certainly will. If she's a last minute addition, for example, she'll be a clone most likely. (I do want the staff, and think it's more likely, but being a last-minute clone is possible)
 
Last edited:

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
This guy was kinda just talking in circles. The only concrete thing he said was that Sonic and Mario have become "buddies".
He makes a ton of good points though. It can happen.
I wouldn't by a company that said they would MAKE Sonic pornography.
You cannot be serious about Sonic becoming a porn star if Nintendo buys SEGA! That's unthinkable
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
...Krystal would not be a clone, dude. That staff she has in StarFox Adventures can make her extremely unique.
I applaud your thinking, man...but we can't say for sure she won't be a clone. There is a slight chance that she could be one...but Rosalina happened & people judged her as "Half-baked Peach clone" before her reveal so what do I know?

Heck its not even limited to Krystal, all the characters we like or support could be made a clone, they all have a chance to be one.

They could take Ridley & make him like Chari- Oh....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom