• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Character Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChikoLad

Purple Boi
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
23,084
The idea of Toon Zelda/Sheik seems sooooooooooOOOOoooOOoOOOOOOoo unappealing and the addition of Tingle to the roster is a slap to the face to every smash bros fan out there.

The only "new" zelda rep that would be received positively is a Ganondorf with a new move set. Otherwise there is no need to over saturate a series that is already represented very well in the game.
...How would Tingle be a "slap to the face of every Smash fan"?

Oh right, this is Smashboards, where playing "For Fun" is blasphemy.
 

TheUnsullied

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
117
Fire emblem only needs Marth, Ike, and Chrom. THATS IT. I would take Lucina but a reskin of Chrom would do just fine IMO
 

zauberdragon

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
313
Location
UK
Regarding the whole roster balance thing of "the big 3":

Mario should stay at 5 as there is really nobody I feel needs including. Rosalina was the best possible choice for a Mario rep. We currently don't need anymore unless we are willing to delve into the RPGs. I wouldn't be too surprised if Bowser Jr. showed up, but that's the max for this game. I really think no other Mario character (from the platformers) needs/deserves a spot.

Pokémon deserves to take the most spots on the roster because it has BY FAR more characters to choose from, it's an endless gold mine for Smash characters. And I'm sure there are more fans of particular Pokémon than there are of Mario characters. This arbitrary "but Mario is the biggest franchise" argument is not logical. Mario may beat Pokémon in sales, but consider the fact that big Pokémon releases come WAY less often than Mario ones. I feel Pokémon is just as well known as Mario at this point. That, and I think it's way easier to please the Pokémon fans than the Mario ones.

Zelda doesn't necessarily need a newcomer, anyone beyond Toon Zelda/Sheik, King Harkinian (:troll:), Vaati or Tingle, is digging at the bottom of the barrel out of desperation. For this iteration of Smash though, Ganondorf being completely revamped would do as a newcomer.
Mario is the company mascot though which sort of supersedes any other franchise! Plus wario, yoshi, dk and diddy are already sort of mario characters. Thing that bothers me is just because someone doesn't have a mushroom next to the name they're not a mario character. The history of all those apart from diddy are linked straight to a mario game and diddy by association.

Brawl had 4-8 marios, 5 zeldas and 6 pokemans in my humble opinion, it just looked like they each had 4.
 
Last edited:

Kenith

Overkill Sarcasm
Joined
Dec 24, 2013
Messages
24,014
Location
The Fabulous Friendly Super Sparkle Train
NNID
RipoffmanXKTG
3DS FC
4210-4224-9442
I personally consider Yoshi to be a Mario character and DK and Wario to not be.

Donkey Kong and Wario have distanced themselves from Mario to the point where Mario doesn't even appear in their games.

Whereas Yoshi characters and Mario characters are interchangeable.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Link, Zelda, Sheik, Ganondorf, Toon Link.
These will be our 5 Zelda characters.

If by the very off chance we get a 6th, it will be Toon Zelda (no Toon Sheik; the Zelda/Sheik split saw the end to that).
 

TheUnsullied

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
117
...How would Tingle be a "slap to the face of every Smash fan"?

Oh right, this is Smashboards, where playing "For Fun" is blasphemy.
I'm sorry dude but Tingle would be such a disappointing roster pick. Even as a "WTF" or "Just for fun character" there are wayyy better options than Tingle.
 

ChikoLad

Purple Boi
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
23,084
Mario is the company mascot though which sort of supersedes any other franchise! Plus wario, yoshi, dk and diddy are already sort of mario characters. Thing that bothers me is just because someone doesn't have a mushroom next to the name they're not a mario character. The history of all those apart from diddy are linked straight to a mario game and diddy by association.

Brawl had 4-8 marios, 5 zeldas and 6 pokemans in my humble opinion.
Again, that's arbitrary reasoning. To me, single Mario characters have more impact than a single Pokémon character, and I'm sure lots of people feel like that. One Mario character has the impact of two Pokémon characters when we are including the likes of Greninja, who aren't that iconic yet. Pokémon really should have the most characters as it is the most character-centric series in Smash.
 
Last edited:

Kenith

Overkill Sarcasm
Joined
Dec 24, 2013
Messages
24,014
Location
The Fabulous Friendly Super Sparkle Train
NNID
RipoffmanXKTG
3DS FC
4210-4224-9442
Oh God, Zelda newcomer debates might be the new Fire Emblem newcomer debates..
It's funny because I basically started all this by deliberately messing with people.

Seriously, I meant literally nothing I said!
Except that Skyward Sword is awesome. Because it is.
 
Last edited:

The Light Music Club

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
3,225
Location
Knoxville, MD/Elizabethtown, PA
NNID
_TLMC_
3DS FC
0576-6097-0725
Again, that's arbitrary reasoning. To me, single Mario characters have more impact than a single Pokémon character, and I'm sure lots of people feel like that. One Mario character has the impact of two Pokémon characters. Pokémon really should have the most characters as it is the most character-centric series in Smash.
That's why Fire Emblem should have more characters than Star Fox or Kirby, cause you know there's like what 40 new characters each game?
 

ChikoLad

Purple Boi
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
23,084
That's why Fire Emblem should have more characters than Star Fox or Kirby, cause you know there's like what 40 new characters each game?
Fire Emblem still isn't on the map enough yet, especially not to a point where it would get TWO newcomers in one Smash game.
 
Last edited:

Andinus

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
462
Location
USA
NNID
kyonyuudaisuki
Like pretty much all the characters everyone keeps claiming as shoe-ins, or guaranteed have no solid basis beyond "hope". Seriously, I feel like everyone is needing a bit of a reality check!

It's fine to fantasize/theorize, but stop talking like its a certainty. Sheesh!
 
Last edited:

zauberdragon

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
313
Location
UK
Again, that's arbitrary reasoning. To me, single Mario characters have more impact than a single Pokémon character, and I'm sure lots of people feel like that. One Mario character has the impact of two Pokémon characters when we are including the likes of Greninja, who aren't that iconic yet. Pokémon really should have the most characters as it is the most character-centric series in Smash.
I'm going to have to disagree there and say it's the least. Sure there's 700 odd pokemon but there's only a handful you could actually get away with putting into Smash. I doubt Stantler or trubbish will make it in the roster any time soon. Everyone has there own experience playing pokemon, I picked the water starter on X and Y as I did with every gen but not everyone did. Even fewer people had a golurk on their team like I did. You play a main mario game and you're playing as mario if you like it or not.

Smash is first and foremost a celebration of Nintendo and Mario is the largest chunk of it like it or not. Pokemon is certainly in the top three, if not second but needs to play second fiddle to ol' jumpman due to company politics.
 

TheUnsullied

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
117
Fire Emblem needs another Blue-hair? I disagree. The Silver hair of both Micaiah and Robin (Female of course) seems so much more appealing.
I understand the concern over the hair color but really... the only ones that can represent the series well are the blue haired mofos. Robin is viable but less likely to happen since Robin is a custom character. If the hair color really bothers you that much then change the skin color.
 

ChikoLad

Purple Boi
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
23,084
I'm going to have to disagree there and say it's the least. Sure there's 700 odd pokemon but there's only a handful you could actually get away with putting into Smash. I doubt Stantler or trubbish will make it in the roster any time soon. Everyone has there own experience playing pokemon, I picked the water starter on X and Y as I did with every gen but not everyone did. Even fewer people had a golurk on their team like I did. You play a main mario game and you're playing as mario if you like it or not.

Smash is first and foremost a celebration of Nintendo and Mario is the largest chunk of it like it or not. Pokemon is certainly in the top three, if not second but needs to play second fiddle to ol' jumpman due to company politics.
Again, your reasoning is arbitrary. Seriously, "company politics"?

Pretty much any bipedal or quadrupedal character in Pokémon is completely viable as a Smash candidate, and even more beyond that. Remember, Pikachu is a mere 40cm high in his own games.
 

ChikoLad

Purple Boi
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
23,084
They were on the Japan map to get two newcomers in Melee though... Heck in Brawl they were supposed to have three characters.
Marth and Roy were originally supposed to be Japan exclusive though, and just about got into Western Melee due to sudden fan outcry. Fire Emblem is a hit in Japan, which is why it got the two newcomers in Melee, but they only made into the Western version due to very sudden demand.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I'm sorry dude but Tingle would be such a disappointing roster pick. Even as a "WTF" or "Just for fun character" there are wayyy better options than Tingle.
This should be interesting.
Like who, exactly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NonSpecificGuy

V Has Come To
Super Moderator
Premium
Writing Team
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
14,022
Location
Mother Base
NNID
Goldeneye2674
3DS FC
0989-1770-6584
They were on the Japan map to get two newcomers in Melee though... Heck in Brawl they were supposed to have three characters.
I don't think people in the west understand how big of a series it is in Japan.
Fire Emblem pretty much defined the turn-based strategy-RPG genre.
And it's been pretty popular in Japan even since the first one on the Famicom.
I'm not saying it's deserving of anything but I thought I'd just point that out.
 

zauberdragon

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
313
Location
UK
Again, your reasoning is arbitrary. Seriously, "company politics"?

Pretty much any bipedal or quadrupedal character in Pokémon is completely viable as a Smash candidate, and even more beyond that. Remember, Pikachu is a mere 40cm high in his own games.
By your logic most mario enemies could be potential characters but that won't happen. You or I could write a moveset for Magmar but he's not going to be playable because he's not relevant at all.

Mario is the mascot it makes sense for him to have the biggest amount of representation. I agree there's more to chose from in Pokemon but that doesn't mean Pokemon should have more characters. Fire Emblem has huge numbers of characters but I doubt you'd argue for inflated numbers of FE reps.
 
Last edited:

The Light Music Club

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
3,225
Location
Knoxville, MD/Elizabethtown, PA
NNID
_TLMC_
3DS FC
0576-6097-0725
Marth and Roy were originally supposed to be Japan exclusive though, and just about got into Western Melee due to sudden fan outcry. Fire Emblem is a hit in Japan, which is why it got the two newcomers in Melee, but they only made into the Western version due to very sudden demand.
That shows that fans worldwide like Fire Emblem. Especially the Smash Community, whom this game is being made for.
 

Zhadgon

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
1,849
Location
Chilangolandia
NNID
Zhadgon
It seems my options are not interesting enough, cries in a dark corner by himself someday I will show them.

.n_n.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Like not Tingle.
Try a non-biased answer.

Exactly what makes Tingle, the only character of the Zelda franchise to get his own set of games, so bad?
Give valid reasons. No "he's creepy" bull**** or "America hates him", which would have affected his status as an Assist in Brawl.

Ghirahim, definitely who he's talking about.
I'd take Tingle over Ghirahim any day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JamesDNaux

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
7,760
Location
Studio Naux
NNID
JamesDNaux
Time to apply my own cockamamie logic to the Pokemon characters.

I've only played the first, third, and sixth gens.

In Red, I had Charizard, in Emerald, I had Sceptile, in X, I had Greninja.

Sceptile confirmed for type triangle completion because I said so/it can't just be a coincidence/I'm a prophet, calling this **** now.

Am I doing it right?
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
If you are going to go the WTF route go all the way... so how about the rumored Chorus Men? :)
I don't really see Tingle within that category.

So by default, I guess the Chorus Kids would be a better "WTF". Though they're only "WTF" because the RH franchise has plenty of others to work with.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom