SuperBrawler
Smash Master
Tingle is one of my favourite characters.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
He sends people to work at his magic tower of slavery and expensive-ass maps?Try a non-biased answer.
Exactly what makes Tingle, the only character of the Zelda franchise to get his own set of games, so bad?
Give valid reasons. No "he's creepy" bull**** or "America hates him", which would have affected his status as an Assist in Brawl.
Show them now, I say NOW.
Zelda:I ignored it because they both have blue hair. #Silverhair4dayz
Seriously dude?In his case, I'd prefer Donbe and Hikari or Duck Hunt Dog.
It's possible, but hard to say.He sends people to work at his magic tower of slavery and expensive-*** maps?
Dunno, really. But if he got in, do you think there would be a chance that he could be represented as a spin-off character and get his own symbol?
----
I have nothing against Tingle, I was simply being sarcastic. He definitely possesses quirky qualities that would make him an odd, yet enjoyable character. While some may be disgruntled upon his addition I think their woes will be easily remedied when they realize that they have the satisfaction of beating the rupees out of him.Try a non-biased answer.
Exactly what makes Tingle, the only character of the Zelda franchise to get his own set of games, so bad?
Give valid reasons. No "he's creepy" bull**** or "America hates him", which would have affected his status as an Assist in Brawl.
I'd take Tingle over Ghirahim any day.
But have you heard the music from that game? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63qEt9OyoUwSeriously dude?
Naw JK but on Hikari and Donbe if I remember right they're from Shin Onigashima.
And Shin Onigashima is a text based adventure so that'd be a little weird.
Possible but weird.
No offense to anyone who likes Toon Zelda, but I hate her for some reason.I think when it comes to a Zelda newcomer, it's down to Tingle and Toon Zelda. Out of all the potentials, they, IMO, have the most merits.
Actually Shin Onigashima was my favorite track in Brawl so yes I've heard.LOLBut have you heard the music from that game? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63qEt9OyoUw
And why not? We need the text based genre to get some love. Why? Because Visual Novels are amazing. Toss in either them or Ayumi Tachibana.
In my opinion they are in the same boat as Ice Climbers, a non-relevant duo that deserves a new game.Actually Shin Onigashima was my favorite track in Brawl so yes I've heard.LOL
And I'd love to see them in, and yes it does deserve some love, and YES they have an awesome opportunity for a fantastic moveset.
But they don't seem likely... Which sucks.
To me, it just sounds like you want Mario characters for the sake of stroking the franchises giggoogity. Beyond Bowser Jr, there are no Mario platformer characters who deserve a place in Smash, and we'd be better off saving him for Smash 6 (3DS and Wii U are 4 & 5).By your logic most mario enemies could be potential characters but that won't happen. You or I could write a moveset for Magmar but he's not going to be playable because he's not relevant at all.
Mario is the mascot it makes sense for him to have the biggest amount of representation. I agree there's more to chose from in Pokemon but that doesn't mean Pokemon should have more characters. Fire Emblem has huge numbers of characters but I doubt you'd argue for inflated numbers of FE reps.
I agree and while I do like them and Duck Hunt Dog.In my opinion they are in the same boat as Ice Climbers, a non-relevant duo that deserves a new game.
I don't want more mario characters, I'd say 5 plus yoshi and wario is fine. I just don't think Pokemon deserves more characters than mario, more than 5-6 reps at any rate just because you could theoretically create movesets for them. I agree Bowser Jr is the only other deserving mario rep but he's no more or less deserving than any pokemon other than mewtwo and jigglypuff.To me, it just sounds like you want Mario characters for the sake of stroking the franchises giggoogity. Beyond Bowser Jr, there are no Mario platformer characters who deserve a place in Smash, and we'd be better off saving him for Smash 6 (3DS and Wii U are 4 & 5).
Now it just sounds like you are completely unaware of the popularity of some Pokemon.I don't want more mario characters, I'd say 5 plus yoshi and wario is fine. I just don't think Pokemon deserves more characters than mario, more than 5-6 reps at any rate just because you could theoretically create movesets for them. I agree Bowser Jr is the only other deserving mario rep but he's no more or less deserving than any pokemon other than mewtwo and jigglypuff.
High virtual 5 for the family guy reference there.To me, it just sounds like you want Mario characters for the sake of stroking the franchises giggoogity. Beyond Bowser Jr, there are no Mario platformer characters who deserve a place in Smash, and we'd be better off saving him for Smash 6 (3DS and Wii U are 4 & 5).
I'd prefer Vaati myself. He's appeared in multiple Zelda games and could potentially be a unique addition. I'm not against Tingle as I think he's the most deserving, but I personally don't like him.This should be interesting.
Like who, exactly?
I've played every gen since the beginning and trust me I'm not underestimating the franchise. You could make some cracking movesets but just because you could doesn't mean you should. To me it sounds like you want to put every popular pokemon in just because it's possible. It's a game for Nintendo all-stars not just Pokemon.Now it just sounds like you are completely unaware of the popularity of some Pokemon.
No, I'd rather they add more franchises, but if we have to oversaturate the roster with any franchise, I'd pick Pokemon, because the character designs are interesting and the moveset potential is there. And I don't even play Pokemon anymore. I play Mario, but I'd be lying if I said there was anymore noteworthy characters from the main series beyond Bowser Jr.I've played every gen since the beginning and trust me I'm not underestimating the franchise. You could make some cracking movesets but just because you could doesn't mean you should. To me it sounds like you want to put every popular pokemon in just because it's possible. It's a game for Nintendo all-stars not just Pokemon.
It hurts me seeing so many cuts...How about my 60 roster for Smash 6, I wish XD
.n_n.
Well I agree with you on the Mario side of things, my argument is just there's no need to over saturate any franchise. I honestly can't see any more pokemon that come close to warranting a place outside an unnecessary starter from a previous gen (sorry grass starter fans).No, I'd rather they add more franchises, but if we have to oversaturate the roster with any franchise, I'd pick Pokemon, because the character designs are interesting and the moveset potential is there. And I don't even play Pokemon anymore. I play Mario, but I'd be lying if I said there was anymore noteworthy characters from the main series beyond Bowser Jr.
What about Pokemon Trainer being cut for a solo Charizard? Or maybe even the Phantom being confirmed as a move. I suppose only one of us could be right!The fact that Greninja's neutral special is so similar to Lucario makes me fret for Mewtwo even more. And he's got the tail on his neck.
Because it's a character that contributes to absolutely nothing and is a complete waste of development time.No offense to anyone who likes Toon Zelda, but I hate her for some reason.
They are expendable, we need more new franchises added and star power, but that is my wish and obviously a lot of people will disagree with me, I´m fine with that.It hurts me seeing so many cuts...
Case in point, Roy, Dr. Mario, Pichu, and Young Link being scrapped for Brawl, and Ivysaur and Squirtle being scrapped for Smash for Wii U/3DS.There will have to be cuts eventually for the sake of balance, so it may as well be a prior-game newcomer who is comparatively unimportant next to most of the rest of the roster.
I thought Squirtle and Ivysaur were important; that was always the defense when I suggested their removal. I suppose something has drastically changed after that Direct... huh?Case in point, Roy, Dr. Mario, Pichu, and Young Link being scrapped for Brawl, and Ivysaur and Squirtle being scrapped for Smash for Wii U/3DS.
I think Wolf's safe. After all, he was planned for Melee, but was replaced by Falco for looking to much like Fox at the time.I feel like Wolf getting cut is inevitable. To be honest he is admittedly an expendable character, I don't mean to sound like one of those clone nazis, but I think from the view of Sakurai, a third character with Fox moves isn't THAT important won't be very high priority this time around. I think he was more of a fan demand character for Brawl and that his purpose has been fulfilled and thus might no longer be needed.
I pray that it's not the case. I love Wolf's move set an Wolf as a character. It'll be sad not having a Star Wolf character. But, priority wise I think he's really low on the list.
That's where I foresee some trouble next game. Beyond Little Mac and Palutena, which other newcomers are going to stick around? Are Greninja, Chrom and the three shock characters (counting Villager because, based on that interview, Sakurai lumps him in with WFT) really going to become permanent Smash fixtures now? Something has to give, eventually. I'm leaning toward that something being them.Case in point, Roy, Dr. Mario, Pichu, and Young Link being scrapped for Brawl, and Ivysaur and Squirtle being scrapped for Smash for Wii U/3DS.
They were only important when together with the Pokemon Trainer.I thought Squirtle and Ivysaur were important; that was always the defense when I suggested their removal. I suppose something has drastically changed after that Direct... huh?
They were only important in the context of the Pokemon Trainer. With him out of the picture they're meaningless enough to be removed entirely and have 0 priority.I thought Squirtle and Ivysaur were important; that was always the defense when I suggested their removal. I suppose something has drastically changed after that Direct... huh?
That is horrible reason. And for the sake of you not getting disappointed, I'd like you to reconsider. BeingI think Wolf's safe. After all, he was planned for Melee, but was replaced by Falco for looking to much like Fox at the time.
Honestly, I feel as though Wolf is safe. He was the originally intended Star Fox character from Melee, and currently he is the more unique candidate. There is no inherent reason to remove a Star Fox character. Nothing would suggest that a removal is necessary. I mean; Pokemon Trainer's cut was most likely due to balancing and his transformation ability (which they did away with). I don't think importance is one of the most important aspects in regards to cuts, if that was the case, we should be more worried about characters like Game and Watch.I feel like Wolf getting cut is inevitable. To be honest he is admittedly an expendable character, I don't mean to sound like one of those clone nazis, but I think from the view of Sakurai, a third character with Fox moves isn't THAT important won't be very high priority this time around. I think he was more of a fan demand character for Brawl and that his purpose has been fulfilled and thus might no longer be needed.
I pray that it's not the case. I love Wolf's move set an Wolf as a character. It'll be sad not having a Star Wolf character. But, priority wise I think he's really low on the list.
What does being planned for Melee mean? Mewtwo was IN Melee and he was more unique than Wolf. Wolf really isn't that important and a third Star Fox character isn't really necessary. Nor is a third Fox Move character.Honestly, I feel as though Wolf is safe. He was the originally intended Star Fox character from Melee, and currently he is the more unique candidate. There is no inherent reason to remove a Star Fox character. Nothing would suggest that a removal is necessary. I mean; Pokemon Trainer's cut was most likely due to balancing and his transformation ability (which they did away with). I don't think importance is one of the most important aspects in regards to cuts, if that was the case, we should be more worried about characters like Game and Watch.