• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Character Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

9Volt

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
334
NNID
Star_Fox_Team
Quote me if you will, but I think the next veteran will be the Ice Climbers, and the next Newcomer will be Krystal.
If Krystal is in she will gonna be secret like Falco and Wolf.
Probably the next newcomer is Palutena or KI Related...
 

9Volt

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
334
NNID
Star_Fox_Team
I love Krystal! Don´t know why people hate her.
 
Last edited:

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
Guys! The next newcomer will likely be shown at E3! We will get probably 3 newcomers!
Seems reasonable. Bonus points if they share the same Trailer video.

For the three that could be shown, I say:

Palutena

Isaac

Ridley (because Sakurai has not shown his model off completely)
 

AEMehr

Mii Fighter
Moderator
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
7,703
Location
SoCal
Huh. Would Luma really be counted by Sakurai as a separate character from Rosalina due to its different moves and the fact that it can be slightly controlled?

Luma is more independent than the Pikmin, but not quite at the level of the Pokemon Trainer's Pokemon.
My point was that it probably took roughly the same amount of development time as a separate character. That said, I'm it counts for something.
I seriously doubt that Rosalina and Luma are two separate characters
They both have different moves and are different enough. You're not going to play as the Luma alone anytime soon, but as far as Sakurai may be concerned, the Luma is practically another playable character.
 

NickerBocker

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
1,091
Location
AB, Canada
3DS FC
2492-4251-5054
I love Krystal! Don´t know why people hate her.
Not all of us hate Krystal. I dont hate her, I'm just going to be realistic. Theres a few reasons why she wont be included. Mainly, Starfox not needing or warranting another addition, combined with Krystal not having as big an impact on Nintendo as characters like K Rool and Ridley, who have both had big impact amongst their respective series.

Starfox this time around should be mainly focusing on differentiating themselves from eachother. While I dont mind similarities, there needs to be some changeups, especially their final smashes. The one way Krystal could have her chances improved would be if Wolf is cut (which I doubt. )
 
Last edited:

MagnesD3

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
4,850
Location
Hiding in Microsoft Headquarters
Not all of us hate Krystal. I dont hate her, I'm just going to be realistic. Theres a few reasons why she wont be included. Mainly, Starfox not needing or warranting another addition, combined with Krystal not having as big an impact on Nintendo as characters like K Rool and Ridley, who have both had big impact amongst their respective series.

Starfox this time around should be mainly focusing on differentiating themselves from eachother. While I dont mind similarities, there needs to be some changeups, especially their final smashes. The one way Krystal could have her chances improved would be if Wolf is cut (which I doubt. )
If we get a new star fox at e3 she could get in tho, but that's a sadly big if... :(

Also wolf should never be cut.
 
Last edited:

AEMehr

Mii Fighter
Moderator
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
7,703
Location
SoCal
Three newcomers at E3 would probably be a likely situation, with (hopefully) a handful of veterans.
If the previous E3 was anything to go by, we'll at least get two newcomers I'd say.

But I agree with CliffJumper on half of his future predictions, it would be the perfect time to reveal the Ice Climbers later this month with NES/Famicom Remix 1+2 releasing in Japan on the 24th this month.
 
Last edited:

The Light Music Club

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
3,225
Location
Knoxville, MD/Elizabethtown, PA
NNID
_TLMC_
3DS FC
0576-6097-0725
In regards to Pac-Man and the namco AT, I still don't think it proves anything. Had it been a character from his series like Ms. Pacman or Blinky then I would say, yes for sure he is in, but every third party that has been in smash, all three have gotten there very own AT from their series. A Galga item in my eyes doesn't mean too much, especially since Sonic I think still doesn't have an item himself.
 

EddyBearr

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
1,202
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota
I wasn't really surprised at all by independent Charizard nor by Greninja. I expected Ridley's perceived delegation.
Still expecting R.O.B. to be cut.
 
Last edited:

Starphoenix

How Long Have I Been Asleep?
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Messages
8,993
Location
Cyberspace
NNID
GalaxyPhoenix
3DS FC
2122-6914-9465
Pac-Man, Mii and Shulk would be my likely guesses for newcomers at E3.
 
Last edited:

The Black mage

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
382
Location
Regna Ferox
3DS FC
2492-4215-1228
I am neutral on this Krystal buisness...
I honestly would say we got all we need from Star fox, but it still feels a bit empty, with 3 clones in such a mix.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
I think Little Mac was our "retro".
Thank you.
It's pretty damn clear that despite Punch-Out having a new game in modern times, Mac's being milked as a classic character with multiple references to the original Arcade game. Even though he wasn't even in that game.
 

Rebellious Treecko

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
5,165
Location
Edge of Existence
Thank you.
It's pretty damn clear that despite Punch-Out having a new game in modern times, Mac's being milked as a classic character with multiple references to the original Arcade game. Even though he wasn't even in that game.
Back when he was revealed, there was some kind of thread or article posted where Japanese fans didn't seem to be as excited as Western fans. I think most of them saw Mac as a retro.

----
 
Last edited:

Substitution

Deacon Blues
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
28,756
Location
Denial
NNID
MisterVideo
I am neutral on this Krystal buisness...
I honestly would say we got all we need from Star fox, but it still feels a bit empty, with 3 clones in such a mix.
But they aren't.
Falco is a semi-clone at best. And Wolf isn't even that, he's his own character.
 
Last edited:

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
The entirety of Wolf's special moveset is based on Fox's, even if it doesn't function in the exact same way.
No one is calling him a direct clone, or even as cloney as Falco, but a semi-clone? Yeah.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I would say Wolf is a space animal before a clone. It's a small distinction; he's "cloned" from a formula that every StarFox character follows to a tee. He is more-or-less his own character as though he does follow that formula, the way he does follow it isn't remotely similar to Fox or Falco. Same as Lucas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
Thank you.
It's pretty damn clear that despite Punch-Out having a new game in modern times, Mac's being milked as a classic character with multiple references to the original Arcade game. Even though he wasn't even in that game.
Though Sakurai did say the classic character he had in mind this time around could potentially be revived as Pit was. Considering Mac has already been revived, I doubt that's who Sakurai was referring to.

I would say Wolf is a space animal before a clone. It's a small distinction; he's "cloned" from a formula that every StarFox character follows to a tee. He is more-or-less his own character as though he does follow that formula, the way he does follow it isn't remotely similar to Fox or Falco. Same as Lucas.
As I see it, being cloned from the formula originated by Fox makes him a clone, and deviating from that formula in the notable way he does makes him only a partial, or semi-clone. But he is still made from the same formula as Fox was... so that's why I still see him as a cloned (but very different) character.

Others do see things differently though.
 

EddyBearr

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
1,202
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Any reasoning behind this? Is it because R.O.B. is unimpressive as a character?
Not the most popular, not a popular Nintendo character, not from a noteworthy franchise by any definition, doesn't seem to fit in with character theme very well (far better as an assist trophy or regular enemy [a-la fighting wire frames]), poor perception in beginning that didn't see much rejuvenation, only recognition stems from "video game historians" or hardcore Brawl fan, etc.

We're gonna have cuts, and I see R.O.B. as among the top contenders because he's not really a "Nintendo character" like the others are (which is largely the source of the majority of my contentions.) Conceptual clones, R.O.B., and Snake are who I consider the most likely to go. Unique & popular/recognizable Nintendo characters only.

The entirety of Wolf's special moveset is based on Fox's, even if it doesn't function in the exact same way.
No one is calling him a direct clone, or even as cloney as Falco, but a semi-clone? Yeah.
I call them full-blown [conceptual] clones.

I would say Wolf is a space animal before a clone. It's a small distinction; he's "cloned" from a formula that every StarFox character follows to a tee. He is more-or-less his own character as though he does follow that formula, the way he does follow it isn't remotely similar to Fox or Falco. Same as Lucas.
Ergo, conceptual clone. The more concepts we can fit into smash bros, the better (I'd assume.) If we waste 3/50 slots on "space animals" or 4/50 on "fast, pretty boy swordsmen" then I think that's a huge waste of potential given the context that smash bros is a game so dynamic that "fire breathing spike turtles" and "iron-tailed electric rats" are utilized concepts.

N3ON said:
As I see it, being cloned from the formula originated by Fox makes him a clone, and deviating from that formula in the notable way he does makes him only a partial, or semi-clone. But he is still made from the same formula as Fox was... so that's why I still see him as a cloned (but very different) character.
To elaborate on it, I think of differentiating between conceptual clones and fighting style clones, because what seems the same might fight differently, and what seems different might fight the same. Past that, I try to look at fighting style from an "intermediate" perspective, for players who play often enough, mostly know the movesets, but don't know the optimization that Smashboard users might know (EX: using falco's pillaring.) At a high skill level, fox and falco are greatly different in fighting style, but at a more intermediate level, they're just clones. At a high level, they're "semi-clones".
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Ergo, conceptual clone. The more concepts we can fit into smash bros, the better (I'd assume.) If we waste 3/50 slots on "space animals" or 4/50 on "fast, pretty boy swordsmen" then I think that's a huge waste of potential given the context that smash bros is a game so dynamic that "fire breathing spike turtles" and "iron-tailed electric rats" are utilized concepts.
Conceptual clone is a good term for it, but I don't think it's necessarily all that bad to have a few. Some characters necessitate similarities to other characters but can be fun in their own right simply by adding a spin to the formula that created its predecessor. See: Wolf, Lucas, Roy, Dr. Mario. I agree I'd rather have unique sets, but there is any worth in clones. I'd say while Roy and Dr. Mario lean towards waste, Wolf and Lucas do enough on their own to be worthy characters, so they don't deserve the "clone" label. Even then, I'd agree a roster full of them would be bad, but a few isn't going to ruin anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
^Wasn't me who said what you're quoting.

But yeah, conceptual clone is a good term. Personally I think both conceptual clones and gameplay clones fit under the umbrella of semi-clone (assuming there are still some differences in gameplay with the gameplay clones - like most of the clones in Brawl).
 

Smashoperatingbuddy123

Smash Legend
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
10,909
I just relized something

You know items and enemy's make some character obvious now


Samari gorah = captain falcon

The polar pear with the pink speedos as a enemy = ice climbers

Mr Saturn/franklin badge = ness/lucas/both

Halberd stage = meta knight

You there's a couple of more for other veterans and newcomers but

Isn't this correct

Super scope = R.O.B

I mean I know that gun was there since melee but it is a nes accessory and so is rob so I think the gun and him are connect
 

God Robert's Cousin

Smash Hero
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Dustbowl
NNID
RepaignPalsims
3DS FC
4339-2483-2603
Not the most popular, not a popular Nintendo character, not from a noteworthy franchise by any definition, doesn't seem to fit in with character theme very well (far better as an assist trophy or regular enemy [a-la fighting wire frames]), poor perception in beginning that didn't see much rejuvenation, only recognition stems from "video game historians" or hardcore Brawl fan, etc.

We're gonna have cuts, and I see R.O.B. as among the top contenders because he's not really a "Nintendo character" like the others are (which is largely the source of the majority of my contentions.) Conceptual clones, R.O.B., and Snake are who I consider the most likely to go. Unique & popular/recognizable Nintendo characters only.
And yet he got in nonetheless. Shouldn't that tell you that R.O.B. will very much follow Mr. Game & Watch in being an unexpected, very-retro character that will recur in multiple Smash Bros.? We're not talking about adding him for the first time, we're talking about him returning. Characters are likely to be cut if they're hard to develop (i.e. Pokemon Trainer) or hard to gain license to (i.e. Snake). R.O.B. doesn't seem necessarily difficult to re-add at all.

R.O.B. is otherwise very much a "Nintendo character". Between having various cameos and being essentially the thing that got video games as a whole started up once again after the Video Game Crash of 1983, he doesn't have a series to speak of, but he sure is an important Nintendo figure, I'd say.
 
Last edited:

Smashoperatingbuddy123

Smash Legend
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
10,909
And yet he got in nonetheless. Shouldn't that tell you that R.O.B. will very much follow Mr. Game & Watch in being an unexpected, very-retro character that will recur in multiple Smash Bros.? We're not talking about adding him for the first time, we're talking about him returning. Characters are likely to be cut if they're hard to develop (i.e. Pokemon Trainer) or hard to gain license to (i.e. Snake). R.O.B. doesn't seem necessarily difficult to re-add at all.

R.O.B. is otherwise very much a "Nintendo character". Between having various cameos and being essentially the thing that got video games as a whole started up once again after the Video Game Crash of 1983, he doesn't have a series to speak of, but he sure is an important Nintendo figure, I'd say.
And in my opinion for one more thing that helps him

Not to mention the super scope is a item again a item from the nes accessories just like R.O.B
 
Last edited:

BluePikmin11

Akko is my dear daughter!
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
28,373
Location
https://twitter.com/BPikmin11
NNID
blue
Not the most popular, not a popular Nintendo character, not from a noteworthy franchise by any definition, doesn't seem to fit in with character theme very well (far better as an assist trophy or regular enemy [a-la fighting wire frames]), poor perception in beginning that didn't see much rejuvenation, only recognition stems from "video game historians" or hardcore Brawl fan, etc.

We're gonna have cuts, and I see R.O.B. as among the top contenders because he's not really a "Nintendo character" like the others are (which is largely the source of the majority of my contentions.) Conceptual clones, R.O.B., and Snake are who I consider the most likely to go. Unique & popular/recognizable Nintendo characters only.
He is a unique character? Having distinct moves such as laser eyes, spin attack, Gyromite projectile, and a jet boost. Is that not unique. "Doesn't seem to fit" and "not really a Nintendo character" is only your opinion, but why do you think he added him in the first place?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom