I take high offense to this since I've been pointing out for the past couple of months that Toon Link is, according to Brawl, "Link as he appeared in Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass", and you're acting as though I'm a blithering idiot that is deliberately ignoring that detail, when all I was saying was that Sakurai rendered the case to be invalid (at which point, if you had stopped to ponder this, it supports the idea that Sakurai clearly doesn't give a damn about the "stage cameo =/= playable" logic; so it doesn't even
matter if it's a different incarnation or not, it doesn't....well,
didn't.....stop Toon Link from showing up, an argument on the pro-Toon Link side that was given that ended up being true.)
I
did read your text wall.
Problem is, your text wall is only going on the tangent of the Spirit Tracks stage (which was only what "sealed the deal", not what made him "unlikely") and not the
biggest tangent that made Toon Link's reappearance doubtful:
The fact this existed.
Since you loved to argue about patterns before, it's surprising that you didn't even address the (now broken) pattern of having a different child Link than the previous game that Brawl "established".
So what's the excuse here? What made Toon Link more "likely" to show up than suffering the same fate that Young Link did? Especially since the case of Toon Link being
specifically "WW/PH Link" means, like Young Link before him, he was old news?
Is there even an answer to that isn't only obvious
after the reveal?