Bowserlick
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2005
- Messages
- 5,136
Your laughter will turn into rage tears. KING K. ROOL!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That's implying that K.Rool will be the only character for the rest of the franchise and it's also implying I don't want K.Rool, both of which are falseYour laughter will turn into rage tears. KING K. ROOL!
Ephraim's got a lance, Sigurd's got one, Hector has an axe, Miciah has tomes, Kamui has a Dragon Stone. And Anna's one of the most popular and uses everything but axes.No, I just like him.
But are there any main characters (main protagonist) of FE that does not use a sword? That is popular?
DK franchise is popular and I think will get at least one character. Even the Zelda series (after Hyrule Warriors 3DS) may see a boost in the ballots.
But I think we can be looking at two third-party. Smash is at a point where companies are begging for their characters to be added.
I absolutely hate this.It always bugged that there's always one character who got way much privileges about swap colors, for Brawl having 10 iirc and for 4 having 16.
While besides you have who are still limited to 8 in total for each...
Agreed, were all those wire-frame palette swaps really necessary?It always bugged that there's always one character who got way much privileges about swap colors, for Brawl having 10 iirc and for 4 having 16.
Only DLC. I am sure FE will get more in future installments. In fact, Mario, Pokemon, and FE really could get a Smash (at least on 3DS) that only includes their franchise.Ephraim's got a lance, Sigurd's got one, Hector has an axe, Miciah has tomes, Kamui has a Dragon Stone. And Anna's one of the most popular and uses everything but axes.
To get things straight, are we talking about DLC or future installments?
NEVER MIND MY ARGUMENTS THEN!Only DLC. I am sure FE will get more in future installments. In fact, Mario, Pokemon, and FE really could get a Smash (at least on 3DS) that only includes their franchise.
Miyamoto bias? The Wireframe Mac was originally his idea, after all.Agreed, were all those wire-frame palette swaps really necessary?
EDIT: And if Mac can have 16 costumes why some of Wario's costumes had to be cut?
Yeah no kidding.I feel like Zelda would be more likely to get a DLC character if fans weren't so split on who it should be.
Third-party? Lol. I don't think we'll get ANY more third-parties at this point (as DLC). And I can only really see one new franchise get added at this point, though I'd love to see more.I have a feeling that FE is done in terms of characters.
I think DLC are probably going to center around third-party and other franchises that have a popular character, but have not received one in this edition.
Fans wouldn't be so split if there were more major recurring characters throughout the series. There just... aren't. That's something Nintendo would have to start doing. Another problem is there's some characters a lot of people want to see, but the other half (or more) don't want to see them because they don't want the Zelda franchise represented entirely by different versions of Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf.I feel like Zelda would be more likely to get a DLC character if fans weren't so split on who it should be.
Mario I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet, it has more then enough popularity to do it, but I guess it's just an area the series is not interested in touching. Pokémon definitely has more then enough, and that's probably one of the reasons why we're getting Pokken, but even that's barely tapping the number of potentials the series has (6 confirmed, 7 at best with Blaziken, while it seems to be releasing in July).Only DLC. I am sure FE will get more in future installments. In fact, Mario, Pokemon, and FE really could get a Smash (at least on 3DS) that only includes their franchise.
I think there will be about 15 characters in Pokken, they're just holding them back.Mario I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet, it has more then enough popularity to do it, but I guess it's just an area the series is not interested in touching. Pokémon definitely has more then enough, and that's probably one of the reasons why we're getting Pokken, but even that's barely tapping the number of potentials the series has (6 confirmed, 7 at best with Blaziken, while it seems to be releasing in July).
Fire Emblem I would love to see, and with its popularity rising (Fates is set to outsell Awakening in Japan), I think it could get it sometime in the future. It'd still probably follow Smash's model of only using lords, but that would allow for those like Celica, Lyn, Micaiah, Kamui and Sigurd to be options outside of Smash.
Daisy is perfect Alt material but not as her own character. Like how I feel Dry Bowser should have been.What do you think about Daisy?
I think she is popular, but when you look at the roster:
You only see protagonists, antagonists and protagonist's or antagonist's sidekicks, a.k.a. important characters.
Daisy is just... I don't know, a filler in spin-offs.
Protagonists:
Antagonists:
Daisy is not the protagonist of Mario sports/party games, she is just one of the characters you can choose. Honey Queen, Spike and Baby Rosalina are not protagonists.
She is not an antagonist.
And no, she is not Peach's sidekick.
Even Toadette is a protagonist/sidekick character now, thanks to Treasure Tracker.
What do you think?
I personally think they will not add her, even if she is popular.
Best Daisy can hope for is a proper alt costume for Peach with a flower motif instead of hearts.What do you think about Daisy?
I think she is popular, but when you look at the roster:
You only see protagonists, antagonists and protagonist's or antagonist's sidekicks, a.k.a. important characters.
Daisy is just... I don't know, a filler in spin-offs.
Protagonists:
Antagonists:
Daisy is not the protagonist of Mario sports/party games, she is just one of the characters you can choose. Honey Queen, Spike and Baby Rosalina are not protagonists.
She is not an antagonist.
And no, she is not Peach's sidekick.
Even Toadette is a protagonist/sidekick character now, thanks to Treasure Tracker.
What do you think?
I personally think they will not add her, even if she is popular.
That would be disappointing, there are so many Pokemon with potential to be playable, and Charizard, Mewtwo and Greninja will probably be playable, meaning that there would be only five slots left.I think there will be about 15 characters in Pokken, they're just holding them back.
Because Daisy having Peach's poses, personality and Final Smash would not work.Best Daisy can hope for is a proper alt costume for Peach with a flower motif instead of hearts.
Why that wasn't done for this game I don't know.
I think fans would be happier with Daisy having a tier alt work than having nothing but the damn color pallette.Because Daisy having Peach's poses, personality and Final Smash would not work.
There is a reason why Dark Pit and Lucina are not alts.
Without Ridley, there is NO other option that works well for Metroid. That said, Zelda is in a good position right now without them changing the status quo in future installments of the franchise.I'm adamant that we need another Metroid character before a new Zelda character, personally. At least with Zelda, Link and Ganon we have a thematic idea to sort of look at (the Triforce). Metroid doesn't have that overarching plot element that needs to be showcased, but it does have one of the darkest relationships in Nintendo's library; that between Samus and Ridley. A glorified pinata boss does not adequately show the animosity the two have for each other, and it's one of the biggest plot points for the series that Samus and Ridley have a bloody rivalry that stems from Ridley's actions, and an even bigger part of Samus' backstory is trying to overcome her crippling fear of Ridley in order to stay alive. Not to mention how Ridley is the leader of a military group, the brains behind the Space Pirate's operations and one of Samus' most persistent foes.
Ridley is also dangerously intelligent and highly sadistic, taking thrill in murdering other sentient beings. He's a prominent villain in both the lore and the games, so he's the optimal choice for a new Metroid character; even Rundas and Sylux, as popular as they are, only have one released game to their name. Ridley's been in almost all of the games in the series, only missing out on Metroid II: Return of Samus and Metroid Prime 2: Echoes.
There's really no competetion for Metroid characters without Sakurai in charge. Ridley just sort of is the optimal new Metroid fighter.
Yes. The reason Dark Pit and Lucina aren't alts is because they decided they had a little extra time to change them up a tiny bit.Because Daisy having Peach's poses, personality and Final Smash would not work.
There is a reason why Dark Pit and Lucina are not alts.
Sylux seems to be rising, slowly. Especially after being hinted at in Fed. Forces.Without Ridley, there is NO other option that works well for Metroid. That said, Zelda is in a good position right now without them changing the status quo in future installments of the franchise.
Yes. The reason Dark Pit and Lucina aren't alts is because they decided they had a little extra time to change them up a tiny bit.
How about with andthen, or with ?Because Daisy having Peach's poses, personality and Final Smash would not work.
There is a reason why Dark Pit and Lucina are not alts.
He's not been hinted at in Fed. Forces, he was hinted at by Tanabe in a discussion about a prospective Metroid Prime 4 in an interview about Federation Forces. But yes, I was going to add Sylux as a note, but at this point in time, Ridley is still the only prospective candidate.Sylux seems to be rising, slowly. Especially after being hinted at in Fed. Forces.
False. Both happenedHe's not been hinted at in Fed. Forces, he was hinted at by Tanabe in a discussion about a prospective Metroid Prime 4 in an interview about Federation Forces.
Didn't stop the Koopalings from being alts for Bowser Jr.Because Daisy having Peach's poses, personality and Final Smash would not work.
There is a reason why Dark Pit and Lucina are not alts.
DK (Donkey Kong, Mario vs Donkey Kong), (maybe) R.O.B. (Subspace Emissary) and (maybe) Mario (Donkey Kong Jr.) should be in both protagonists and antagonists.What do you think about Daisy?
I think she is popular, but when you look at the roster:
You only see protagonists, antagonists and protagonist's or antagonist's sidekicks, a.k.a. important characters.
Daisy is just... I don't know, a filler in spin-offs.
Protagonists:
Antagonists:
New Pork City dlcYou know what? I want the Ultimate Chimera return
Daisy is a "sidekick" in one of the Mario games.What do you think about Daisy?
I think she is popular, but when you look at the roster:
You only see protagonists, antagonists and protagonist's or antagonist's sidekicks, a.k.a. important characters.
Daisy is just... I don't know, a filler in spin-offs.
Protagonists:
Antagonists:
Daisy is not the protagonist of Mario sports/party games, she is just one of the characters you can choose. Honey Queen, Spike and Baby Rosalina are not protagonists.
She is not an antagonist.
And no, she is not Peach's sidekick.
Even Toadette is a protagonist/sidekick character now, thanks to Treasure Tracker.
What do you think?
I personally think they will not add her, even if she is popular.
Maybe, but that depends, how does Tekken typically reveal their character before arcade release? Do they hide some, or do they reveal them all?I think there will be about 15 characters in Pokken, they're just holding them back.
Fire Emblem I think is likely to get a Warriors crossover later on.
There's your problem.Daisy is a "sidekick" in one of the Mario games.