Headcrab Jackalope
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 855
- Location
- Kalimdor
- NNID
- Jackalope1313
- 3DS FC
- 0791-2751-5749
- Switch FC
- SW-2418-1451-4036
Octillery or Malamar please. Best Pokémon ever.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I crossed out what you posted because it's irrelevant.I can come up with a list of how to make Lucas and Toon Link fully unique.But, it won't happen
You can come up with unique abilities for Lucas?
That's neat. I can't. But that doesn't matter, I might as well cross out what's irrelevant as well.
Ideas =/= predictions
Your Predictions =/= 100% what must happen
Not for Sakurai.
Oh, hello Sakurai.
You're right it's not. But, they become semi-clones anyway. Again, irrelevant.
And 9 characters that share moves or are for the most part based on another move set.
Guess this is irrelevant, if what I said was.
And, well, it is. There is no pattern except for adding newcomers and returning veterans. Which is vague, like my ideas.
And good enough for Lord Sakurai.
Well when every character who \fits the description of a significantly similar character originally capable of performing the same moves has become a clone or somebody who mostly shares moves with another character and Lucina fits that description (more than most clones I might add) I'm gonna say: Yeah! It does actually.
^
......and..............contradict each other. A character doesn't have to be a clone because they are similar. Everybody can and should be unique.
..................v
That's not why. I already told you why.
Just going to leave some Ike here, seems like a good place:
Luigi with an entirely Poltergust based move set would be something we have yet to see.
That's... interesting? It's not a playstyle gimmick, and it makes no sense. Where as my idea does. But OK.
Seriously.... how do any of your points rebuttal mine at all?
Me: -They can be unique
-They should be unique
You: They won't be unique
Me: How do you know? are you Sakurai?
You: [insert pattern bull**** that doesn't apply as patterns in the series don't exist]
Me: There are no real patterns of the series, Sakurai doesn't try to be guessable. You can't use past games to justify a new game.
So what's your response to that?
And Luigi literally debuted as a green Mario in-game Mario Bros.The difference is:
1) Daisy literally debuted as an orange Peach in-game SML
Irrelevant to the point.2) Daisy's most important (and only important) appearance had her playing the same role as Peach
This point makes absolutely no sense.3) Peach's Daisy colors are actually still Peach anyways. It's Peach wearing a different dress that has a design reminiscent of Daisy. If you put on your friends clothes (not sure why you would), you don't become your friend.
And you don't receive your own playable slot in Smash Bros.
You mean like....Mario and Luigi?EDIT: 4) Also, they usually even have the same stats in the various sports games they appear in.
if you say so.I'd say Grovyle, but to me has actually has a chance. It's a very very very small and tiny chance, but it is a chance.
This just made me think of a great idea.To be fair, if we're going for legitimate left-field Pokemon possibilities, might I suggest Diancie? Or one of the other yet-to-be-announced event Pokemon for X and Y?
Event Pokemon have typically been saved for Pokeballs in Smash, but it'd be interesting (if nothing else) for them to have a playable event legendary. Could you imagine, Nintendo doing a worldwide online distribution of Diancie/Volcanion/Hoopa and then releasing a trailer for that Pokemon in Smash on the same day? The marketing practically writes itself.
Alas, I'm basically expecting the Brawl line-up plus Mewtwo. A man can dream though, right?
Lucina may not be unique on her own, but if we pair her up with Chrom they could make quite the uniqueLucina? Unique?
I think I'm gonna end this "debate" here. Imma go sleep.You can come up with unique abilities for Lucas?
That's neat. I can't. But that doesn't matter, I might as well cross out what's irrelevant as well.
Well, he can use any PSI ability Sakurai wants.
Your Predictions =/= 100% what must happen
Don't be douchey. I'm simply being realistic.
Guess this is irrelevant, if what I said was.
No, I gave you reasons why it's irrelevant. Don't act like I'm being a narcissist because I'm the one presenting evidence that's in my favor instead of yours.
It's irrelevant because what you suggest contradicts what has happened before and is already an established and unbroken trend.
......and..............contradict each other.
No you said I declared them clones because they have swords and blue hair. And that's not what I said. You know that.
Read your own damn posts
Just going to leave some Ike here, seems like a good place:
Go ahead! It doesn't back up your point. Ike can't perform the same abilities as Marth. So he can't be a clone. Just like Rosalina.
Saying a character with a pistol could be a clone of a guy with an uzi doesn't just make sense because they are both classified as guns
That's... interesting? It's not a playstyle gimmick
Are you aware of what a playstyle gimmick is. Because that's exactly what it is.
and it makes no sense.
Why? And real mature there with the big star gif. How old are you exactly?
Seriously.... how do any of your points rebuttal mine at all?
Me: -They can be unique
-They should be unique
You: They won't be unique
How is what your suggestion of what can and should happen relevant to what likely will happen. Unless you are Sakurai and share the same opinion?
Me: How do you know? are you Sakurai?
You: [insert pattern bull**** that doesn't apply as patterns in the series don't exist]
Now I'm convinced that arguing with you is hopeless. Name ONE character that shared major similarities to another character and was capable of performing their moves who DIDN'T share moves with them.
There isn't one and it's happened to every single character who applies to it. So it's a pattern. It exists. You can't deny it.
Me: There are no real patterns of the series
Uh, yes there are several. You want to ask people here? They'll tell you the same.
Sakurai doesn't try to be guessable. You can't use past games to justify a new game.
In most situations yes you can. Just like you can use Sonic's popularity in the last game to predict Mega Man in this game. Just like you can use a retro in Melee to justify a retro in Brawl.
So what's your response to that?
My response is this: "The **** are you rambling about?"
I thought you were arguing it was OK to assume Rosalina would be a clone of Peach because Daisy would. And I thought you were referring to Peach's Daisy color swap when mentioning her.And Luigi literally debuted as a green Mario in-game Mario Bros.
Yet.....he isn't entirely a copy of Mario (which is rare for him).
Aside from this, Luigi doesn't have much to distinguish himself from Mario ability-wise. Daisy, for someone who's pretty much limited to mass multiplayer festivities, manages to upstage Luigi in the "distinct from counterpart" department.
Irrelevant to the point.
This point makes absolutely no sense.
1. No one ever brought up anything about Peach's Daisy color in Smash. Let alone said that Peach "becomes" Daisy while using that coloration.
2. By the logic of color swaps, what the **** is Wario doing as a character in Brawl, when Mario's got a Wario palette? If you put on your rival's clothes (not sure why you would), you don't become your rival. And you don't receive your own playable slot in Smash Bros.
Do you see now how dumb that sounds?
You mean like....Mario and Luigi?
At least Daisy isn't typically shown with the same exact abilities or slight modifications to Peach's as Luigi does to Mario.
EDIT: And before you keep retorting with her lack of a major role in the franchise, bear in mind that it has nothing to do with what is being argued, despite being true.
Roy, perhaps.What's exciting is that Roy or Mewtwo could show up any friday without a Nintendo Direct.
My two cents for a 'neverhappeningcausePokemonmakesabout200charactersbetweenSmashs' character would be
View attachment 9302
This. AndMy two cents for a 'neverhappeningcausePokemonmakesabout200charactersbetweenSmashs' character would be
View attachment 9302
Is Stafy a Pokemon now? I fail to see the relevance :vHitmontop for Smash, it's better than Starfy.
Roy, perhaps.
I'd like to think Mewtwo has the kind of all-star power to warrant a returning veteran trailer. I know that there hasn't been a trailer for a veteran yet, but none of the veterans announced so far are in the unique position that the Brawl cuts are.
Third-parties obviously play by different rules though - I don't think a third-party would even let Sakurai use their character if he didn't make a big show and spectacle about it (despite being a veteran).
It doesn't even need to be a Friday.What's exciting is that Roy or Mewtwo could show up any friday without a Nintendo Direct.
Damn straight it is!Volcarona would be another amazing Pokémon character that'll never happen.
Off Topic
@ Mega Bidoof
Your new avatar is sweet. Adventure Time is da best.
BecauseWhy Grovyle when you can Darkrai?
......Pretty sure I've already implied that Luigi was very similar to Mario when I kept mentioning that Daisy being different from Peach in comparison to him.If you're actually talking about Daisy being able to have a different moveset from Peach, then yes. It just seems like your leaving out that Luigi is mostly a Mario clone. He was a complete clone in SSB64, but was mostly changed up in Brawl. So he got unique after modifications to his moveset slowly throughout every game in the series.
First, look at what Peach has in Smash.Unique moves for Daisy and Luigi:
Luigi- Poltergust
Daisy- Crystal Smash
That's all I got. Is Daisy really more unique from Peach than Luigi is to Mario?
My responses = Red
Your responses = White
I think I'm gonna end this "debate" here. Imma go sleep.
If Daisy's ever added as a playable character and she's a clone. I'll get what you mean. But until then, Daisy being able to be unique, and Rosalina being able to be unique, doesn't really support the assumption they'd be clones. Daisy is more similar to Peach, but would not be a clone if added... I don't think their rushing this one and last minute clones aren't the way to go. I don't think Sakurai will purposely add any clone newcomers unless rushed... and they have time.........Pretty sure I've already implied that Luigi was very similar to Mario when I kept mentioning that Daisy being different from Peach in comparison to him.
First, look at what Peach has in Smash.
Toad Shield: Daisy does not have Toad servants.
Peach Bomber: ....ok, she can copy this and still make sense.
Parasol: Other than Mario Party 3 (which every playable character uses one for a mini-game), Daisy doesn't use a parasol. Let alone as a weapon like Peach did in Super Mario RPG.
Vegetable: Daisy wasn't in Super Mario Bros. 2/USA, and in their very limited appearances, they were never in games Daisy was in.
Peach Blossom: Considering this is part Super Mario RPG reference part name pun, this would not work for Daisy.
Daisy by default (unless Ganondorf-esque logic comes in) would have to be different. Even if it means a huge chunk of the moves are like Luigi's Green Missile, in that they come out of freaking nowhere.
Throughout the Mario series, Daisy has been shown with the ability to manipulate flower petals in a similar to, but less extreme manner as Byakuya from Bleach (though his are specifically cherry blossoms). It isn't really that difficult to come up with a moveset that revolves around that, and that's not including the crystal power from Strikers Charged nor factoring in her normal attacks being less "girly" than Peach to reflect her tomboyish and more violent nature.
That being said, I wouldn't want Daisy in Smash. However, for the purpose of argumentation, Daisy is like Rosalina in that despite similarities to Peach, they have (or had in Rosalina's case) means of being special. Yet, due to their similarities, it was reasonable to believe they could just be clones/semi-clones, even if Ganondorf logic has to apply. (But then again, look at Dr. Mario. The only reason why he's a clone is because he's Dr. Mario. Hard to believe, but there's ways to make even Mario's medical persona distinct as well and not have to resort to making **** up like "Super Sheet" just to keep him like Mario.)
Agreed.Obviously the best Pokemon rep is Wes.
Not really, you didn't connect you're post to your original thought......it's like what I had said went right over your head.
I like the idea of Wes fighting himself and his Espeon and and Umbreon support him, for instance his recover could be Espeon teleporting him.Agreed.
I actually have some ideas that are floating around for a playable Wes (alas it'll never happen... ah well, it's still fun coming up with ideas, no?).
I'm not sure if I'd like a duo Umbreon & Espeon tag team, or that + Wes somehow joining in the fight more. (What, Colosseum is noted to be more darker than other Pokemon series, and there's some cases of physical violence that happened. Heck, Wes could even use bombs to attack and throw Snag Balls at people lol jk.)
Anyway, the reasons why I chose Umbreon and Espeon is that they're pretty memorable Pokemon in the game, being the starters and all. It's also stated that those Eeveelutions have been Wes' companions for a long time, so he must have a strong bond with them. I also personally like those Pokemon overall, though as long as Wes is different than PT, I'm fine with anything.
Too bad Game Freak doesn't seem to care about Pokemon games other than the mainline ones. Orre is one of my fave regions, and one of the most interesting in terms of the of the environment and atmosphere imo (dat desert punk feel, yo!). I'd be nice to see that region revisited one day, whether that'd be Genius Sonority or somebody else developing the game.
Trivia: Orre is inspired by Phoenix, Arizona, as stated in an interview.
Wait a minute......Trivia: Orre is inspired by Phoenix, Arizona, as stated in an interview.
A copy of Half Life 3 confirmed for SSB4.Wait a minute......
Pokémon is a Nintendo series that is represented in Smash.
One Pokemon game featured the Orre Region.
The Orre Region was based on Pheonix, Arizona.
Pheonix.
Pheonix Wright confirmed for Smash!
EDIT: I seriously like the idea of Wes, though Id prefer the guy from XD, just because I played XD and not Colosseum. But that's just bias.
oh noA copy of Half Life 3 confirmed for SSB4.
We using first names or something now? I don't understand.
I remember it being something else entirely, but I'll let it slide...An idea roster is not a prediction roster.
NNGHToo late! The world knows it!
Uh, are you suggesting that Lucina's design is very similar to Marth's Shadow Dragon design to the point where you would mistake one for the other? I highly doubt anyone would with prior knowledge to who Marth actually is.Please tell me you're joking. Because it does just the EXACT opposite of that. Which would be succeeding incredibly.
I was moreso referring to people mentioning Ridley's iconic Super Metroid design and talking about how awkward that would look resized, while ignoring the perfectly functional Other M design. 'Cept I was imagining you keeping the Awakening designs in mind, without remembering that Smash For's design has little similarities to Awakening's design.Why? Because a character is "Too something" it's automatically bigotry?
Lucas is Lucas. Totally should be semi-clone, I don't see your problem here.Lucas is pretty visually different from Lucas. Guess he can't be a semi-clone.
As was Roy, Leif, Ike, Chrom, and any other future Fire Emblem lord. What sets her apart is the wide variety of classes she can utilize. Something unique to her, which is something I believe Lords of previous games can't live up to.So what? She shares the same role as a character regardless of what her role plot wise is. She's a caped swordsman.
You suggested that being a caped swordsman = clone material.Ike's sword is heavier and not structured remotely like Marth's. It can't perform all the same actions like Lucina's can. Once Again, stop playing stupid.
So I looked it up and discovered they both do have some different PSI, but I'm not sure how it's relevant. So he wanted Lucas to be similar to Ness, okay. What if he wants to make Lucina similar to Marth? Or what if he doesn't want to make Lucina similar to Marth?Once again, Lucas has several different PSI abilities. Because Sakurai doesn't care what PSI abilities he gives him. He WANTED them to be ones that are similar to Ness.
Which apparently wasn't enough to make him different from Marth as a clone. You know who else could use magic, Lucina!Leif's got magic
Nothing damage-wise sure, but a defensive Lucas would have been interesting.Lucas has new PSI
Toon Link being a clone actually makes sense since he's, you know, Link.Toon Link has several different items
The only character that shouldn't have started off clone-like is Lucas.So do lots of clones. But, that's just how it works.
Said it before and I'll say it again. I never said she won't or couldn't be semi-clone material. But I completely doubt the fact that they would add her to just make her a clone. Makes no sense, especially with the types of newcomers we're getting in this game.Potential to not be a clone sure. But, when you go around saying that's enough basis to say she'll be a unique character. THEN you don't know what you're talking about.
She could, like Lucas could.Because if that were true then Lucas wouldn't share moves with Ness. It's the mere fact that Lucina is BASED on Marth that it wouldn't' be plausible to assume Sakurai would want her NOT to share moves with him if she can. And not only CAN she, but she can EXACTLY the same way Marth can.