Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Hm...maybe. Purely from a "thrill" or "hype" standpoint, I could see that from both prospects, when compared to the newcomers that have been offered so far.I meant more so an avatar character using hammer space to attack. It has to do more with the lack of thrills and chills after we've gotten some interesting ideas brought to the table, it would just feel lacking. It's sort of like why I think revealing Chrom would cause a negative response at this point in time.
I still say people underestimate Dixie too much.Out of curiousity...how would you feel about Dixie in this regard?
10/10 would-Looks like a certain someone hasn't been talked about for a while on this thread
Aesthetics, eh? I think it's very pleasing. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so please feel free to ignore my suggestions, but if I were the one making this, I would put in-game based banners on the sides of the logo on the top (like a "Back" banner on the right and a "2:00 Minute KO Fest!" or "3-Stock Survial" banner on the left, or something like that). I also would have given each character one unified matching background, although the individualized colors is kinda cool.Still looking for feedback on the aesthetics on this, not the characters on it. The border feels bland to me but I'm not sure what else I can do.
Actually, there was a small discussion on Midna a few pages back.Looks like a certain someone hasn't been talked about for a while on this thread
MIDNA >:D
Click to see the full-size image, I dare you.
We're talking about SMASH attacks.No, that's ZSS's Side Special. Her Neutral Special is the paralyzing shot.
I'm aware of this, as I am sure everybody else on this entire forum is.Little Mac did have a Wii Reboot (Punch-Out! on the Wii) but whether that counts or not... I'm sure the final roster will show us that.
Punch-Out!! Wii is essentially the original Punch-Out!! with a lot more personality in it. That doesn't mean I don't like it or anything, but when it comes to a franchise getting a "revival"... Kid Icarus's crazy genre spin makes it much more "revived" than Punch-Out!!'s Wii game.The difference is that he appeared in Punch Out!! for Wii before appearing in Smash, while Pit appeared in Smash before appearing in Kid Icarus: Uprising. Little Mac has been revived already, Sakurai does not need to revive him because he is revived already.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punch-Out!!_(NES)A: He's not that old
Twist my personal views? Uh, what? Punch-Out!! Wii is the closet thing we have to Classic Nintendo gaming in our current generation (or previous, I should say. Current Gen's would probably be Tropical Freeze).B: He's not a retro no matter how you want to twist your personal view on what retros are.
It's obvious he's referring to older Nintendo characters and Little Mac IS an older Nintendo character.I don't think you should intentionally, take Sakurai's quotes so loosely. I thought about using "older characters" as a defense for Samurai Goroh, but I think it's pretty obvious that he's referring to retros.
I thought about doing the select screen options, but I didn't feel like trying to make it look like a pass-off of the actual screen, I'd like to keep it simple as well. For the characters, do you think black or white (or something else) would look better? Any ideas as to where else I could implement their page colour? I tried the borders once. My current one has the colours only on confirmed characters, while unconfirmed veterans have white squares and possible newcomers have black ones.Aesthetics, eh? I think it's very pleasing. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so please feel free to ignore my suggestions, but if I were the one making this, I would put in-game based banners on the sides of the logo on the top (like a "Back" banner on the right and a "2:00 Minute KO Fest!" or "3-Stock Survial" banner on the left, or something like that). I also would have given each character one unified matching background, although the individualized colors is kinda cool.
I mean his last game was 5 years ago.25 Years is pretty old in my book.
Sakurai said he was looking for older characters. That does not define a character as retro because they are 5 years old. I think Sakurai used the term "older characters" loosely, actually referring to his set definition of retros.Twist my personal views? Uh, what? Punch-Out!! Wii is the closet thing we have to Classic Nintendo gaming
So F-Zero was a retro franchise during Brawl? Despite that it was 3 years old? It's an old game that kept the same genre.A revitalized franchise or character would be Pit, as Uprising is literally in an entirely different GENRE than the older games.
Says you! This is YOUR definition of retro, not Sakurai's.Little Mac works as a retro character like that.
Maybe I misspoke. I wouldn't take Sakurai's quotes LITERALLY.It's obvious he's referring to older Nintendo characters and Little Mac IS an older Nintendo character.
Same here. Except I would not consider a 45 roster realistic, let alone 44! I think the lowest is 48 and the highest is 50. And you should also take into consideration how many newcomers TOTAL. You can have more than one newcomer in one slot. Like Pokemon Trainer or Toon Zelda/Tetra.The roster is meant to be very minimalistic with no-cuts, I originally aimed for 44 characters and I still felt like I needed 45 to get everyone I felt was necessary in there. If I went for a 50 character roster it would have a "formal" retro character, maybe even two!
Imp Midna could switch between using Wolf Link and being alone. She'd be a mage type character alone, but with Wolf Link she becomes a quadruped unable to take damage from below, just like Nana doesn't affect Popo's damage, Wolf Link would be like a giant shield from below. Her Final Smash would turn her into her fused shadow form, a large monster with a spear. And at the end, she'd transform to Princess Midna (like ZSS in a way). Her True Form could wield the Twilight Sword for basic attacks, unused items for specials, and magic type moves for the rest. Imagine her using the unused sword skills like the helm splitter, great spin, etc. Imagine her using the Ball and Chain, Dominion Rod, Spinner, or maybe even some not in Twilight Princess. A combination of a magic/item/sword character is something I want to see. Magic orbs, warping, telaporting away anyhing no matter howMidna has never been a character I can really get behind. She sits among characters like Zant, Geno, Skull Kid and the Metroid Prime Hunters as a one-hit-wonder character, not destined to appear again.
If Sakurai can come up with a unique and fun gimmick for her (a la Rosalina), I wouldn't be against it (how a character plays is the most important thing, after all) but on character merit alone I don't think she's got what it takes, especially against the likes of other Zelda characters - not to mention the fact that Twilight Princess is slowly growing to be considered as one of the 'weaker' 3D Zelda titles and Nintendo has been moving away from that direction somewhat.
If you want to pick a FE semi-clone so much... why Roy over Chrom or Lucina?So this would be my take on a 48 character roster (though I stand by my last one more.)
View attachment 9227
@ AEMehr : Thanks for the icons
- My only doubt with Roy is his potential. I mostly stand by Robin because the Tactician has appeared two times, will likely become a staple, and is very unique as well as a different unit.
- Also please excuse my lack of a second retro.
Midna is the only one I would get behind. . .Midna has never been a character I can really get behind. She sits among characters like Zant, Geno, Skull Kid and the Metroid Prime Hunters as a one-hit-wonder character, not destined to appear again.
Because fire.If you want to pick a FE semi-clone so much... why Roy over Chrom or Lucina?
Thanks for the link to the Anna thread! I was trying to find it earlier!Midna is the only one I would get behind. . .
if you know what I mean
lolololololololololinnuendolololololololololol
I'm. . . I-I should go to bed now.
Well I sure can't think of a multiple characters that already have moves involving fire.Because fire.
Well that doesn't make him any less younger. It's not like Mario is suddenly a fresh face in the gaming industry because of 3D World being released in November.I mean his last game was 5 years ago.
Well I think he just said "older characters" because it's what he's interested in having "older characters" in the game somehow. Whether it's by playable means or not has yet to be seen.Sakurai said he was looking for older characters. That does not define a character as retro because they are 5 years old. I think Sakurai used the term "older characters" loosely, actually referring to his set definition of retros.
F-Zero is (or was) much more into the public eye than Punch-Out!! is. It's anime being a key factor in it's Japanese popularity. From a gaming perspective I'd say that you could consider him Retro, but the anime is what keeps the franchise as a whole relevant.So F-Zero was a retro franchise during Brawl? Despite that it was 3 years old? It's an old game that kept the same genre.
From what I can tell Retro characters represent a certain system. Only retro characters thus far that really reflect this are the Ice Climbers to specifically represent the NES and Pit for apparently the Famicom (But I have seen some sources Pit was added because he was a "Popular" candidate).Says you! This is YOUR definition of retro, not Sakurai's.
Maybe not, but like I said I couldn't fit in a formal retro character in there. So Little Mac is the retro character in this roster.Maybe I misspoke. I wouldn't take Sakurai's quotes LITERALLY.
Having only 8 newcomers may sound like a stretch, (I'm not even a big fan of it myself), but given that Sakurai has said that he believes the team needs a change of direction I think that this happening could be a thing.Same here. Except I would not consider a 45 roster realistic, let alone 44! I think the lowest is 48 and the highest is 50. And you should also take into consideration how many newcomers TOTAL. You can have more than one newcomer in one slot. Like Pokemon Trainer or Toon Zelda/Tetra[/quote
That Ridley icon looks a little...off. The coloring I mean. It's seems too on the red side. Like it was cropped out of a screenshot where Ridley is in the lava-filled Pyrosphere, so the lighting is more reddish.So this would be my take on a 48 character roster (though I stand by my last one more.)
And I want to play as a merchant, but we're both going to have to move on.I still want to play as a Manakete.
This.@SaturnGamer64 my only personal qualm with your roster is no Shulk. I'm not a fan of Goroh but I know your position and won't attempt to change that.
I know you're not keen on Shulk, but he is a very possible candidate, and I think you should consider him.
At this point, I'm almost alright with just Marth and Ike, and not adding anybody.@ andimidna
I just don't give a **** about Fire Emblem anymore.
Just bring back Roy, because I want to watch the world burn.
I want to play as a merchant AND a manakete .-.That Ridley icon looks a little...off. The coloring I mean. It's seems too on the red side. Like it was cropped out of a screenshot where Ridley is in the lava-filled Pyrosphere, so the lighting is more reddish.
My only non-visual related qualm is the lack of K. Rool, but that's only one thing, so it's still good.
And I want to play as a merchant, but we're both going to have to move on.
I think that has no chance of happening. If Sakurai neglects the idea of having a FE newcomer, I think he'll just take the easy route and add the old guy, Roy. Although I don't think he's going to overlook the series... if there's any existing series that really deserve a new rep based on the series' merits it'd be Fire Emblem, Donkey Kong, Kid Icarus, and Metroid.At this point, I'm almost alright with just Marth and Ike, and not adding anybody.
In the grand scheme of things, Anna and Tiki have virtually no popularity for Smash. Until they get that, they're incredibly unlikely. They might have vocal supporters here, but that doesn't mean much.I want to play as a merchant AND a manakete .-.
They're basically the most recurring FE characters not included that people actually care about... it's a possibility. They have more moveset possibilities than many...
In a perfect world...I would love a Midna/Wolf Link combo. However, any new Zelda character would make me happy.
I would pick Skull Kid over the rest.
Popularity FOR Smash? What does that mean? Sorry for the ignorance.In the grand scheme of things, Anna and Tiki have virtually no popularity for Smash. Until they get that, they're incredibly unlikely. They might have vocal supporters here, but that doesn't mean much.
Smash could give them the popularity they deserveIn the grand scheme of things, Anna and Tiki have virtually no popularity for Smash. Until they get that, they're incredibly unlikely. They might have vocal supporters here, but that doesn't mean much.
Take Shortie's poll for example. They don't get requested. They're not even close to say, Roy or Chrom. They might be reoccurring characters, but without the popularity to push them, they pretty much have nothing.Popularity FOR Smash? What does that mean? Sorry for the ignorance.
Roy will literally and figuratively be burning things.@ andimidna
I just don't give a **** about Fire Emblem anymore.
Just bring back Roy, because I want to watch the world burn.
Moveset possibilities? Yeah, I'll give the two of them that. But they're not popular enough in the grand scheme of things, which is pretty important. Even here they're not that popular. Hopefully Anna will get some more somewhat-significant roles in later games to get her popularity up. Unlike pretty much every Fire Emblem character, her chances aren't completely shot if she misses this time. (I mean, assuming there is a next one, but let's just assume there is.)I want to play as a merchant AND a manakete .-.
They're basically the most recurring FE characters not included that people actually care about... it's a possibility. They have more moveset possibilities than many...
"almost"?At this point, I'm almost alright with just Marth and Ike, and not adding anybody.
I know what you mean, so don't worry bro.Take Shortie's poll for example. They don't get requested. They're not even close to say, Roy or Chrom. They might be reoccurring characters, but without the popularity to push them, they pretty much have nothing.
Don't even bring Wii Fit Trainer into this like a lot of people do. That's completely different. (not saying you will. I just see that a lot lol)
In general, I just feel like Fire Emblem should get another character, so in that line of thinking, I would want them to. But deep down, I would gladly forfeit a Fire Emblem character for someone like say, Shulk."almost"?
For whom, my good Entei?I'm fine with forfeiting both.
Hey now, Roy got a lot of love too!And Saturn... why do you feel so strongly towards clones
1) Higher standards have been set this time around
2) There's more on the line... the success of this game could be great for the Wii U, a clone won't destroy that... but why hurt the hype with any disappointment?
There are so many unique classes in Fire Emblem that could easily be made unique... Roy was just a last minute choice for a game 13 years ago... they almost put Leif as the FE clone too. It's not like they've ever really shown much Roy love. He has his merits of course... but people are looking for something new... new character w/ unique moveset>new moveset for old character>new clone>old clone without a doubt.
I still want to play as a Manakete.
Are people arguing clone inclusions because of patterns? I'm thinking we may see them if time restrains are in issue, but as a semi-clone (perhaps something like Wolf). I mean maybe Sakurai will pull a Melee and add clones to spice up the roster (I personally hope they're semi-clones), however, I'm not seeing it. Who knows... I would like to see if characters like Falco and Ganon are still clone-ish though. That's a big one for me.And I consider everybody except Wii Fit Trainer unique this time around. So half have been added in this game... you can't argue clones because of patterns. Patterns justifying anything implies Sakurai is a robot. And I'm pretty sure he's not... so anything is fair game. Like not having 2 Pokemon newcomers, no new Starfox rep, not adding a new Small Link replacing the old one (which has been confirmed to not be happening)... and more.
Nah, if you really want the sparks to fly, take out Ike and only leave Marth.@ andimidna
I just don't give a **** about Fire Emblem anymore.
Just bring back Roy, because I want to watch the world burn.
As well as Bowser, Peach, Wario, Sonic, Dedede, Meta Knight...I know what you mean, so don't worry bro.
Ah ha. I understand what you mean... but is Sakurai dependent on requests alone? To what point do they effect him? Megaman could be one case....