D
Deleted member
Guest
Then you're not agreeing with what I'm saying.Not really?
This logic only works if you're saying unknown, literally means unknown, but there are people in the general audience who have heard of both.
I'm not speaking in absolutes.
And looking at it now, now I don't agree with what I'm saying, since there's more than just "well known" and "unknown".
Now I'm going to revisit my previous statement of neither being "well known" to the general public and nix the "unknown" aspect of my logic.
So instead of being "well known vs. unknown" it's "well known vs. not well known vs. more well known". You're still not agreeing with what I'm saying.
I'm saying neither were well known. You're saying one is more well known than the other. It's impossible to be well known and not well known at the same time.