lightdasher
Smash Lord
This is bait.Why people wanting characters they like infuriate you? I don't understand.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is bait.Why people wanting characters they like infuriate you? I don't understand.
You think people will tell you that you're incorrect for feeling an emotion due to the wants of other people? I don't think that's possible.Knowing my luck I probably will, and the entire forum will gang up on me telling me why I am wrong and should jump off a cliff or something, it's what normally happens.
Let's see...What are the chances of any of the characters in my signature making it do you think?
No she isn't.Villager is already confirmed.
This is the greatest line to come out of this thread right now. It's a really big thought that I've started to put into my rosters...When you think there will be cuts and there aren't any, you're happy.
When you think there won't be cuts and there are, you're not so happy.
That's one of my rules.
You are referring to an alternate costume/seperate female villager, correct?No she isn't.
So you specifically mean the female villager?No she isn't.
Not my emotion no, my reasons for why they shouldn't be in, it really pisses me off because everyone always uses the same flawed reasons.You think people will tell you that you're incorrect for feeling an emotion due to the wants of other people? I don't think that's possible.
Well there's a difference between if a character "shouldn't" be in and if a character won't be in. I think that Jigglypuff shouldn't be in Smash, yet she still keeps coming back. Some people think that 3rd parties shouldn't be in, but they are. Also "same flawed reasons"? I could say the same for people who argue against Ridley's inclusion.Not my emotion no, my reasons for why they shouldn't be in, it really pisses me off because everyone always uses the same flawed reasons.
The implication of most people that have strong distaste for other people's opinions is that they view other opinions as somehow morally reprehensible. This isn't always a bad thing, mind, but it's ridiculous when speaking about trivial and morally neutral matters such as what characters one hopes be in Smash Bros.Why people wanting characters they like infuriate you? I don't understand.
I'm not saying anything on my reasons for Ridley, Miis however, I cannot fathom how anyone would want this thing playable, it's not even a character, it's ugly, a self-insert avatar, probably the only thing you'd see online, people want it to be one of those "use your mii then pick an already existing characters moveset" which would make them flood online even more, there are far better and important characters that could easily go over Miis, Smash is a cross-over for actual video game characters, as much as I hate Ridley, I'd rather see it over Miis, plus the roster is limited, what if Miis were put in over your favourite character? (Don't you dare say Miis are your favourite character) plus I just have a biased opinion on Miis.Well there's a difference between if a character "shouldn't" be in and if a character won't be in. I think that Jigglypuff shouldn't be in Smash, yet she still keeps coming back. Some people think that 3rd parties shouldn't be in, but they are. Also "same flawed reasons"? I could say the same for people who argue against Ridley's inclusion.
Good Roster. Okay Size, that's generally reasonable for 48. On your thoughts on some of your newcomers, I can mostly see them coming in. This roster is intruiging, I applaud your boldness with Saki, even if he is a placeholder.
Here's a new roster on the off chance we only get a single DK newcomer, I've removed Dixie and added Saki. Yeah, Saki.
Words bloody well said. I don't really care about Fire Emblem as much anywhere, and people really do need to get over it. I expect Chrom or Lucina and I don't really see it as a big deal no matter which we get.Chrom: Don't care about Fire Emblem anymore, you either get yelled at for having a risky choice, or yelled at for the too safe choice, so just pretend whoever you personally want is there instead of Chrom.
I couldn't possibly be more satisfied than if we got this roster.Alright, hopefully there will be no repeats of last night. As I'm ignoring Saturn now.
Here's a new roster on the off chance we only get a single DK newcomer, I've removed Dixie and added Saki. Yeah, Saki.
[collapse=Reasons] King K. Rool: Already gone over this, unique, important, and currently the most requested newcomer worldwide.
Ridley: Second most requested character, mostly in the west. Very unique and air oriented character, likely would be the biggest as well.
Palutena: Yeah, if that leak turns out to be fake, I'll be really shocked.
Takamaru: Completes the Famicom Four, unique retro newcomer, etc.
Krystal: I very unique choice with a decent amount of requests, which Sakurai knows about this time.
Saki: Well, Little Mac got promoted, so why not add another? He was the most fleshed out assist in Brawl as well. Mostly a "placeholder" slot.
Chrom: Don't care about Fire Emblem anymore, you either get yelled at for having a risky choice, or yelled at for the too safe choice, so just pretend whoever you personally want is there instead of Chrom.
Lip: See the many reasons I've listed before on how she's got a good shot. Really hoping she gets in this time.
Pac-Man: Some people do like him, as surprising as that is. Very possible that he'll be the "Snake" of this game.
[/collapse]
I am sorry?This is bait.
I had to read your post three times to understand what you were saying. You speak complicatedly. (Or I am just too dumb?)The implication of most people that have strong distaste for other people's opinions is that they view other opinions as somehow morally reprehensible. This isn't always a bad thing, mind, but it's ridiculous when speaking about trivial and morally neutral matters such as what characters one hopes be in Smash Bros.
I see. You don't know how to properly talk to other people. To my ignore list you go (the first user I will ignore in this board)You should be.
You should be.I am sorry?
I couldn't possibly be more satisfied than if we got this roster.
Dare I ask where you got the K. Rool image, or if you still have it? I've seen versions of it before, but certainly not this clear and saturated, looks really great.
That picture is fine, dood. Seriously. Looks awesome.
Full credit to Moon Monkey for the whole thing, I just tweaked the gold colour a bit.
Made my day man, thanks a ton!
Full credit to Moon Monkey for the whole thing, I just tweaked the gold colour a bit.
And glad that this roster is at least completely satisfying for someone. Only two responses so far, but certainly more well received than previously.
I would favor Dixie over Krystal, but besides that, your roster is amazing. Congrats!Alright, hopefully there will be no repeats of last night. As I'm ignoring Saturn now.
Here's a new roster on the off chance we only get a single DK newcomer, I've removed Dixie and added Saki. Yeah, Saki.
[collapse=Reasons] King K. Rool: Already gone over this, unique, important, and currently the most requested newcomer worldwide.
Ridley: Second most requested character, mostly in the west. Very unique and air oriented character, likely would be the biggest as well.
Palutena: Yeah, if that leak turns out to be fake, I'll be really shocked.
Takamaru: Completes the Famicom Four, unique retro newcomer, etc.
Krystal: I very unique choice with a decent amount of requests, which Sakurai knows about this time.
Saki: Well, Little Mac got promoted, so why not add another? He was the most fleshed out assist in Brawl as well. Mostly a "placeholder" slot.
Chrom: Don't care about Fire Emblem anymore, you either get yelled at for having a risky choice, or yelled at for the too safe choice, so just pretend whoever you personally want is there instead of Chrom.
Lip: See the many reasons I've listed before on how she's got a good shot. Really hoping she gets in this time.
Pac-Man: Some people do like him, as surprising as that is. Very possible that he'll be the "Snake" of this game.
[/collapse]
What is your bias against the Pokémon Trainer? Just curious to see if we share the same bias.View attachment 8639
Only removed character is PT, but that's mainly because of personal bias.
As I said, I had Dixie on it before, alongside Krystal. Though some people seem to think it's impossible to get more than one DK character at a time.I would favor Dixie over Krystal, but besides that, your roster is amazing. Congrats!
Well Saki is a placeholder, so you can swap him out for anyone, Isaac included. Isaac was the first one that came to mind, but I ended up going with Saki since he's the "underdog" of the two.Well, the only character I'd want added to JamesDNaux's roster is Isaac.
I have no problem with the character choices.
Caeda... This takes me back a year or two. But seriously, why her at this point?View attachment 8639
Only removed character is PT, but that's mainly because of personal bias.
ok I will admit defeat even though Im not a Tingle supporter I think he's over rated tooGood point, and also Tingle was an AT in your logic which means I still win
Well then what stage is Samus'?I dont know if this was mentioned yet but since all newcomers reveald so far have had there own respective stages maybe the Pyro Sphere Stage is Ridleys. This kinda makes sense since the boxing ring was teased as long as that stage and It really dosent seem right to hype a stage hazard boss unless there is more to that gimmick than we know.
Just that I didn't find his concept to be any good in the slightest and the character's mechanics really hindered the Pokemon from being effective, and that ESPECIALLY goes double for Ivysaur. That and Zoroark's illusion just does it way more for me than PT ever could. I mean c'mon, a character like Shang Tsung would work perfectly.What is your bias against the Pokémon Trainer? Just curious to see if we share the same bias.
I really like your roster, btw.
Well, I guess you can also call it personal bias, but she has always been my favourite character from the series since I played Shadow Dragon. Now mind you even though I'm not that big of a Fire Emblem fan, I'd like something that will show people that aren't into Fire Emblem that the characters are capable of actually wielding something other than swords (WOAH!).Caeda... This takes me back a year or two. But seriously, why her at this point?
Call it Tac, an enemy whose ability in the Kirby games is literally copying any ability permanantly.I've always wondered, what would you guys think if Kirbys copy ability replaced all of her B moves instead of just her neutral B?
I like this rosterAs I said, I had Dixie on it before, alongside Krystal. Though some people seem to think it's impossible to get more than one DK character at a time.
This was the original roster, I just swapped Dixie out for Saki in the new one.
Well Saki is a placeholder, so you can swap him out for anyone, Isaac included. Isaac was the first one that came to mind, but I ended up going with Saki since he's the "underdog" of the two.
Except Miis are not exactly left-field... you want left-field? Look no further than Wii Fit Trainer.I think the only reason a Mii would possibly get in is because of the whole "We're also trying to play to left field concept."
Miis are attempts to match up right field (hardcore, more serious Nintendo gamers) with left field (casual consumers won over by the Wii) that ended up being a severely left field play. Most casual focused left field games have Miis.
This given, 90% of us here would not be exactly pleased at the playable status of a Mii. Though many other left field consumers would likely be a little pleased.
That picture is fine, dood. Seriously. Looks awesome.
Its great man you got everyone I want so I'm satisfied.Alright, hopefully there will be no repeats of last night. As I'm ignoring Saturn now.
Here's a new roster on the off chance we only get a single DK newcomer, I've removed Dixie and added Saki. Yeah, Saki.
[collapse=Reasons] King K. Rool: Already gone over this, unique, important, and currently the most requested newcomer worldwide.
Ridley: Second most requested character, mostly in the west. Very unique and air oriented character, likely would be the biggest as well.
Palutena: Yeah, if that leak turns out to be fake, I'll be really shocked.
Takamaru: Completes the Famicom Four, unique retro newcomer, etc.
Krystal: I very unique choice with a decent amount of requests, which Sakurai knows about this time.
Saki: Well, Little Mac got promoted, so why not add another? He was the most fleshed out assist in Brawl as well. Mostly a "placeholder" slot.
Chrom: Don't care about Fire Emblem anymore, you either get yelled at for having a risky choice, or yelled at for the too safe choice, so just pretend whoever you personally want is there instead of Chrom.
Lip: See the many reasons I've listed before on how she's got a good shot. Really hoping she gets in this time.
Pac-Man: Some people do like him, as surprising as that is. Very possible that he'll be the "Snake" of this game.
[/collapse]
...Her?I've always wondered, what would you guys think if Kirbys copy ability replaced all of her B moves instead of just her neutral B?
WFT is Left Field, as stated. But we can get more than one leftie, eh?Except Miis are not exactly left-field... you want left-field? Look no further than Wii Fit Trainer.
If I were Sakurai and people are expecting but not wanting Miis as playable characters (even though many people outside of Smash communities genuinely like Miis)... and I wanted to do something left-field, I would have added the Wandering Heroes... this way, casual players are happy with cat and dog Miis... and Smash fans are happy they didn't get penis-faced and Hitler Miis.
Kirby is a heI've always wondered, what would you guys think if Kirbys copy ability replaced all of her B moves instead of just her neutral B?
Please tell me you just didn't call Kirby a "her"I've always wondered, what would you guys think if Kirbys copy ability replaced all of her B moves instead of just her neutral B?
Kirby's gender has never officially been defined I can call it a her if I want to gomlKirby is a he
Either way, I think it'd be extremely weird in some situations, like seeing Kirby doing Wario's Fart or pull out a bike. I think just keeping it as a neutral B is fine.
She had two stages in Melee and Brawl so its not like there is only gonna be one metroid stage in this game.Well then what stage is Samus'?