Autumn ♫
I'm terrible with these Custom Titles.
Was the Palutena leak true? It looks like it was, but I'm still not entirely sure.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The only thing then is why would Sakurai ask Ubisoft for permission to make the trophy when they sent him the model just for this purpose? Wouldn't they, you know, use his Smash model for his trophy? Because that seems to be that way for the other characters this game, like using the Mega Man X model and using an identical Phosphora model.Characters have trophies.
Not that I'm defending that leak, just Rayman.
Heaven forbid this game lack a Cooking Mama trophy.Yeah, it was a completely random disconfirmation, but it was a disconfirmation nonetheless.
On the bright side, his trophy could mean trophies for Layton, Bayonetta, and other Nintendo focused third-parties like, say, Cooking Mama.
Though I digress.
Rayman was leaked? Who leaked it?Did I not just say that I was defending Rayman?
I don't believe that leak for a second, why would Rayman be outright playable while Snake, a veteran, is DLC? It's fake.
Now Rayman as DLC? Hell yes.
Some guy in a random reaction video to Palutena's trailer off-handedly stated that he knew the guy that leaked the images, and the rest of the guys didn't bat an eye to it. I'll give you the link once I find it.Was the Palutena leak true? It looks like it was, but I'm still not entirely sure.
What about Birdo?
Yoshi clone?
We don't know when this exchange actually happened, you guys seem to think that they just sent it to him the day before he made the post and he just decided then and there to add the trophy and randomly tell us all about it.The only thing then is why would Sakurai ask Ubisoft for permission to make the trophy when they sent him the model just for this purpose? Wouldn't they, you know, use his Smash model for his trophy? Because that seems to be that way for the other characters this game, like using the Mega Man X model and using an identical Phosphora model.
Had he not mentioned that this model was imported from outside the Smash team, I think Rayman would have a chance at another role. Rayman's not gonna be playable, guys.
It is your dream roster and yet call it a prediction roster even though not all confirmed characters are in? You can't be serious. It isn't even a prediction roster and it is off-topic no matter what you think.Here's my dream roster but, I'll call it a prediction roster so we're on-topic.
It's a WIP btw, I'll add 4 more slots if the actual roster surpasses 50+
Order:
1st row: Mario, Luigi, Princess Peach, Bowser, Toad, Wario, Yoshi, Kamek, Little Mac, Sonic, Mega Man, Pac Man, Yoshimitsu
2nd row: Link, Princess Zelda, Impa, Ganondorf, Skull Kid, Samus Aran, Ridley, Anthony Higgs, Kirby, King Dedede, Meta Knight, Marx, ROB
3rd row: Fox McCloud, Wolf O'Donnell, Donkey Kong, Diddy Kong, King K. Rool, Marth, Ike, Chrom, Aversa, Pit, Palutena, Hades, Alexandra Roivas
4th row: Pikachu, Jigglypuff, Mewtwo, Feraligatr, Charizard, Ness, Masked Man, Captain Falcon, Captain Olimar, Mr. Game & Watch, Tom Nook and Aged Snake
Rationale on newcomers:
Toad: I feel is more relevant than Rosalina
Kamek: Another Yoshi rep, spellcasting.
Yoshimitsu: Represents 2 franchises for Namco, very awesome personality too.
Impa: Represents more females and Hyrule Warriors, long history with LoZ too since NES.
Skull Kid: Represents the second LoZ N64 villain next to Ganondorf, also a spellcaster to make it more fun. Cool personality too.
Ridley: No explanation needed.
Anthony Higgs: I thought Metroid was underrepresented and he seemed fit cause the Other M theme they have, he's also got moveset potential to be heavy artillery.
Marx: A TRUE Kirby villain, also represents Superstar Saga.
King K. Rool: No explanation needed.
Chrom: Main protagonist of Awakening, I don't like Avatar characters so I decided not on Robin.
Aversa: Female antagonist of Awakening, also a spellcaster. Also... waifu.
Hades: KI villain rep
Alexandra Roivas: Well, this one is interesting. I loved Eternal Darkness and I thought this game needed a horror rep, also a female.
Feraligatr: I like him more than Greninja, just a bias.
Masked Man: Villain and another rep for Mother.
Tom Nook: Decided against villager cause again... I hate avatar/customizable characters (no depth imo)
Why I cut a lot of characters:
Most of them that I cut were clones.
Others I thought didn't add much depth cause they're ambiguous avatar characters (Robin, Mii, Wii Fit Trainer and Villager)
Unless Sakurai and his team go the lazy way and make a quick clone character. It's a shame and I'm sure Dark Pit supporters would want to see his other weapons, but it's sadly possible.It's his 2nd most used weapon.
And his Figma has both it and the Silver Bow as weapons for him to hold (while Pit just gets the Palutena Bow).
Why I bring up his Figma is because Sakurai has it, and made this pic quite a while back:
....with him using it.
This means if Dark Pit is playable in Smash, he's using the Dark Pit Staff somewhere (even if it's just for a Special attack or two).
I'm thinking he has a decent chance to be playable. He's the only other Kirby character that I can see making playable status. Which I would look forward to.So I guess no one wants to talk about Bandana Dee's chances....like always.
She was my most wanted Kid Icarus rep. So much potential.I don't understand why if we're getting a Kid Icarus clone, it's Dark Pit when the superior choice is clearly Medusa.
- Appears in all games in the series
- Visually diverse from her base (Palutena)
- Freaking cool evil snake lady
- Did I mention she is a freaking cool evil snake lady?
The guy is actually a supposed troll and said that there would be a playable boss mode using the Wii U gamepad.http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/633202-super-smash-bros-for-wii-u/69440637
Guys this thing is quite eerie!
you need to read it...someone actually did correct the Gematsu leak, and they are right about Lucina in everything, I have a feeling it's someone from the Treehouse...It was on the day of E3 or something...something for the Gematsu believers to grab on!
I agree with the roster completely.Alright here's my predicted roster. Went for likely/reality, not what I want (otherwise, K Rool would be over Dixie.
Yellow around the character means im not sure. This is Zelda rep and Bandanna Dee and the Unknown. I was tempted to make a 51 roster as that is what I think is happening, but 54 lines up with website (which still may not be good evidence for 54?)
Anyway, Captain Toad is there because he's the only character I'm sure we'll be getting as DLC. Others will come though
It's not that I don't believe you, I'm someone who's interested in reading rumours wither fake or true xD, so would you mind giving me the source of his other supposed "leaks" ?The guy is actually a supposed troll and said that there would be a playable boss mode using the Wii U gamepad.
That contradicts what Sakurai said.
Also, Mewtwo as a boss would make people riot.
I think we all came to the conclusion that Captain Toad is a near guarantee DLC character. I don't see Bandana Dee being playable happening at least for the time being; maybe as character DLC, but there's really nothing suggesting that he might be playable. I'm going out on a limb here and saying that Sakurai has planted hints towards almost all of his remaining newcomers. Because of this, I believe we are going to get Ghirahim (Trophy Quiz) and Dark Pit (Palutena trailer; possibly a Secret character explaining his lack of a banner; and now we know that there could be newcomer trophies) as well as possibly King K. Rool (the Kremlings). Dixie Kong could still happen, and if so, then it's pretty much the only way we are getting a newcomer trailer dedicated to the Donkey Kong franchise (Dixie and K. Rool).Alright here's my predicted roster. Went for likely/reality, not what I want (otherwise, K Rool would be over Dixie.
Yellow around the character means im not sure. This is Zelda rep and Bandanna Dee and the Unknown. I was tempted to make a 51 roster as that is what I think is happening, but 54 lines up with website (which still may not be good evidence for 54?)
Anyway, Captain Toad is there because he's the only character I'm sure we'll be getting as DLC. Others will come though
Sceptile was thrown around a lot. Other than that, it is difficult as to which characters to speculate in favor of. Unique newcomers from recent series, perhaps Krystal around the release of the new Star Fox? However, others believe that clone characters or characters that missed their opportunity will make an appearance.Is Captain Toad really the only potential DLC character you guys can come up with?
:|
**** that noise... such as Dr. Mario.
I'd love to see them, but I feel stage or trophy is better at this point in time. Roster is saved for Nintendo's all stars, and for a series as new as Splatoon, not even out when Smash releases, they haven't become a Nintendo All Star series yet.I still hope that the Inklings will get in as DLC as a way for Nintendo to promote Splatoon.
Ink shooting squid lolis for Smash? I like the sound of that quite a bit.I still hope that the Inklings will get in as DLC as a way for Nintendo to promote Splatoon.
I am not insinuating that Rayman is a playable character, but the PoTD was a Rayman trophy, so it does not have any feasible correlation with the alleged playable Rayman as it was just a trophy.In response to the Rayman discussion earlier:
"In order to make Rayman's trophy, we asked Ubisoft to share their references."
"In order to make Rayman's trophy."
It was specifically stated in the caption of the pic that they had asked for Ubisoft's input for a trophy.
You can make the argument that Rayman might be planned DLC, but even in that case this just seems like a way too upfront and direct way to tease a character, even by Sakurai's highly unpredictable standards. I can't say that latter part for certain though, but given all this I don't think Rayman's gonna be playable, or at the very least not planned to be at the moment.
Again, I can't say for certain that this isn't a potential tease, but IMO it just seems like an incredibly odd way to handle it. Just don't get your hopes too high up guys.
Take another look at that wording.In response to the Rayman discussion earlier:
"In order to make Rayman's trophy, we asked Ubisoft to share their references."
"In order to make Rayman's trophy."
It was specifically stated in the caption of the pic that they had asked for Ubisoft's input for a trophy.
You can make the argument that Rayman might be planned DLC, but even in that case this just seems like a way too upfront and direct way to tease a character, even by Sakurai's highly unpredictable standards. I can't say that latter part for certain though, but given all this I don't think Rayman's gonna be playable, or at the very least not planned to be at the moment.
Again, I can't say for certain that this isn't a potential tease, but IMO it just seems like an incredibly odd way to handle it. Just don't get your hopes too high up guys.
I don't believe Rayman is playable.@ JamesDNaux
Don't forget that this was the work of Sakurai's translator, not the man himself. Wording such as that doesn't necessarily imply anything, considering how "Rayman no Torofi" could just as easily translate to "Rayman's Trophy" as it could "The Rayman Trophy".
Plus, it'd be unprecedented for a character to have their trophy shown before their own reveal. This is in addition to how, if Rayman had Classic and All-Star trophies, he'd have his in-game model posing for them, as we've seen from the multiple Wii Fit Trainer trophies during the Smash 3DS portion a while back. It literally makes no sense for Rayman to be the sole character to have such trophies as a different model from their in-game model.
I think people are looking too deeply into this. We may as well say Wonder Red, Saria, Big Mac, and Brittany all stand a chance at being playable too, considering we've only seen their trophies thus far.
DLC definitely seems possible, that's for sure. I was just speaking more towards the retractors (is that a word?) that think this trophy confirms Rayman in the base game. We're both speaking towards the well-intentioned extremists of each other's sides, it seems. At least that means we're not really in disagreement!I don't believe Rayman is playable.
I'm just sick of Rayman detractors, so many people are outright hating on my second favorite character of all time.
The trophy gives me high hopes for him to be a downloadable character added after the games are released, it doesn't make me think that he's already in the game. People are taking what I say to mean something different than what it is.
Well I'm just glad you're not a Rayman hater.DLC definitely seems possible, that's for sure. I was just speaking more towards the retractors (is that a word?) that think this trophy confirms Rayman in the base game. We're both speaking towards the well-intentioned extremists of each other's sides, it seems. At least that means we're not really in disagreement!
Honestly, that's why I want them to be in Smash Bros, it's like the best way to become a Nintendo all-star and I hope that Splatoon isn't a franchise that fades away into obscurity. Just look at Captain Falcon, he went from no one to one of Nintendo's most popular characters because of Smashbros. That and the Inklings look like they could have a very fun and unique moveset if handled right.I'd love to see them, but I feel stage or trophy is better at this point in time. Roster is saved for Nintendo's all stars, and for a series as new as Splatoon, not even out when Smash releases, they haven't become a Nintendo All Star series yet.
no just no too new of a series and it has to pick up that popularity first to even be considered for smash I know there are people out there who would like to see that because of their weird fetishesI still hope that the Inklings will get in as DLC as a way for Nintendo to promote Splatoon.
Greninja was picked before the public knew about it. Popularity wasn't involved, and it was new. Splatoon soldier could be a great and very interesting character. And seriously, why would tentacle lovers resort to smash as their outlet? I'm sorry, but it seems that many of your points are invalid...no just no too new of a series and it has to pick up that popularity first to even be considered for smash I know there are people out there who would like to see that because of their weird fetishes
People could easily think that the Splatoon Soldier got in the way of misc. that may not have gotten in like Isaac or Saki. So, I think it'd be less realistic to do that with misc. than with Pokemon.Greninja was picked before the public knew about it. Popularity wasn't involved, and it was new. Splatoon soldier could be a great and very interesting character. And seriously, why would tentacle lovers resort to smash as their outlet? I'm sorry, but it seems that many of your points are invalid...