Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
He needs to be the counter of Rosalina,we dont need her broken recovery(FALCO'S DAIR DOES NOT KILL ROSALUMA AT 160%)
She still a space character regardless of where she is though.
but stair fax characters are space characters too
Same could be said every day lol
On the day of my birthday, that would be something. But I wouldn't say "lucky" though.
That's why I not only main Rosalina but also Falco too and Fox is my secondary. I've been so into space characters these days.
Yeah, but Wednesdays are more likely for Directs to actually happen.
Falco functions strangely in Sm4sh relative to older games imo (I guess most do but still). All it takes is practice, and once you learn the flow of his ground into aerial strings, he becomes so fun. Good? a little bit. I wouldn't say Falco is bad in Sm4sh anymore, and that to me gives me the confidence to do well against players that use higher tier characters. Pocket Sheiks no longer are a threat to me, only Sheik mains, and players well beyond my skill level.
I already answered that. Snake currently is one, Ryu is likely. Ice Climbers are also another one. Yes they disappeared in this instance because of tech issues with the 3DS, however Sakurai did state that it was also unlikely they'd ever get another game soon. If relevance can kill off characters it will also be a factor in them not being brought in.
Relevance is one factor out of many. In all his canon representations he also is huge, not Ridley huge but huge enough where it may be possible Sakurai would not be happy with the representation portrayed size wise to warrant not being in there. Wow, you can ignore the signs pointing against things all you want but they don't magically disappear because you choose to turn a blind eye.
I meant that they wouldn't disappear from their own series after appearing in Smash. And I don't think relevancy will matter as much as it did when deciding the base game's roster, especially if characters like K. Rool and Isaac are the most requested ones.
What was his last canon appearance, Literally 16 years ago in DK64? I can't recall anything later which wasn't a spinoff or something in which he actually played a major or relevant role. They always have that option of bringing him back but I'd say if a series can go 16 years without a character they've mostly moved on.
DK: Jungle Climber, released in 2007 (and Mario Super Sluggers in 2008, but that's not a DK game). And Retro has acknowledged K. Rool's popularity. But if you want to detract K. Rool, post that to the K. Rool thread instead of posting it here.
People don't listen to facts they just circle jerk defend to the death, might as well ask a bird to fly into a cat's mouth. Everywhere except a characters own thread is a more neutral discussion zone. He isn't guaranteed that's for sure. His renown is decent enough, his chances not so much but better a lot of the more questionable suggestions flying around.
There are also some moves which might not translate well given the different engine properties and all. Fox and Falco are quite different indeed although I hope whatever they do they keep the core playstyle intact.
This reminds me of the Bandana Dee situation, you detract the character here, but don't dare to post your arguments to the support thread (although in Dee's case you were outright insulting the character and the support thread). If you want to detract the character, but don't dare to go to the support thread, you could at least use the DLC Character Discussion thread.
I've told those people if they want to PM me or discuss the character in any other thread they are more then welcome to. They don't because they know people actually use reason and know there are a combination of Pro's and cons for any character but would rather not hear the cons because oh noes must be hatin not allowed to say anything bad about anyone in case your feelings are hurtz oh noe!!!!!!
I'm not going to continue this argument anymore, this is Wolf's thread, K. Rool should be discussed on his own thread or DLC Character Discussion thread, and if you don't dare to post your arguments to either thread, then it's pointless to continue.
The Dee thread. No K.Rool fans (that I know of) have asked me to expand or clarify any position or points I've had. They aren't as blind to his issues as other threads are of their own characters issues which is actually refreshing.
Okay, I agree. I'm not very experienced with countering arguments, I hoped that some user that is used to answering detractor's arguments would try to answer your's. But I still think you should use the Character Discussion thread for detracting, it is a neutral place, and this thread is not meant for discussing other characters than Wolf.
I tried this several times with Krystal, and you know it won't end well *points to Chico*
I dunno, you think it's a good idea you ran and counter every single one who rated low for Wolf? I can see it being your style of doing things, but it just seems that your post look much more like a Wolf campaign than an actual RTC. You completely disregarding everything else that is not Wolf, lel
I'm not detracting. Like I said:
You'll notice we've only had news and topics of discussion which at best have vague references to Wolf or Wolf being in Smash as DLC. We've not had any direct information in regards to Wolf, something relating to Wolf, or Star Fox Zero in ages. Once all the relevant talking topics have been discussed after a while if we have nothing things go slightly off-topic. It happens. Trust me if someone wants to ask something or some news happens everyone will literally talk about it.
A dicussion is a discussion. I'm not saying they are wrong or aren't allowed to think that. There were plenty of neutral points about things people said about Wolf, like the guy who gave Wolf 50% but at least provided a logical reason for it and have a basis for it. If people think im running a wolf campaign they clearly read the %'s only and then didn't read the giant wall of text in the middle. Thread itself allows for debate in its rules so its not like I am free to discuss or question things.
I read the giant text, and that's why I feel like you're running a campaign more.
I'm not sure if 100% chance ratings are allowed to any character, even extremely likely characters like Wolf, unless they're leaked (though you gave a very convicing explanation for your rating)... but then again, one guy was allowed give a minor third-party character 85% and he was clearly biased, but it was still counted.
Doesn't say anywhere it isn't allowed. Besides it comes with a detailed write up anyway so why people may not agree with it as much as they want at least I provide a basis. I think any % that doesn't come with a reasonable explanation should not be counted if any.
So, simply because I like character the points I made were not valid? People are free to make comments and counter my points as much as they like, they won't because nothing said was without basis and is generally pretty tight unlike other people making comments and %'s with no explanation at all besides what side of the bed they woke up on. I saw other people nominating Wolf again and doing higher than 5 so assumed it was alright. I'll fix that.
That's very normal, as one who almost always run into arguments.
Eh, I didn't say that. I just feel that you went out to counter everyone's point is a bit... strange. Nothing wrong with that.
Asking for context and clarification is not strange and like I said not everyone I responded to was to "Counter" as in my example of commending the 50% chance number reason, considering the OP itself prefers explanation's in addition to the %'s to justify them. Strange is a % with little to no context or explanation. Of course I'm not going to be the OP Police I'm only going to care about reasonably explained %'s for specific characters.
Yes, I already posted my list and I had Wolf as #3 on it.
Yes, you're right, it's probably allowed as long as there is a reasonable explanation. BTW, the guy who gave the minor third-party character 85% chance actually had an explanation, but I still don't think it should've been counted (considering that character wasn't even main character of the series and barely has any demand).
Really, many people don't explain much on the %. In fact there are plenty of 90+% votes that have no explanation, sooo
We're gonna have fun with dis thang!The OP seems to be on top of things, probably didn't count it.
Which is nonsense but not my thread so he's fit to police or not police how he likes, although he has at least allowed the option for people to at least question what is being said within reason.
Your brother is a good person
He said that he counted it. He also said that the character would have the lowest chance score if he hadn't counted the rating.
Does the OP itself get updated? Like I dont think results have been updated since day 20. Guess its not as disciplined as the Community Tier List.
Most people aren't basing it on anything logical and aren't really providing a baseline for things either. Hopefully we get some sort of new smash news soon that will bring people back up to reality.
