Vinylic.
Woke?
What the **** at the suspicious confirmation, lmao.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Vynil plsWhy explaining me when I haven't even made a post yet?
I even forgot to subscribe here.
IDK, I think that's the fishiest thing we have so far. I wouldn't mind looking into it as a first priority right now.What kantrip said was hella off, but I really don't want to see him as a first priority here.
Oh come on, it's not fishy, it's just dumb looking,IDK, I think that's the fishiest thing we have so far. I wouldn't mind looking into it as a first priority right now.
as dumb looking as claiming vanilla in a no vanilla game, I'd say. Still, I'd like to hear an explanation from him. It looks like the RVS methods in this forums are weird (assuming that was an RVS...)Oh come on, it's not fishy, it's just dumb looking,
I know this doesn't help town or hunt scum or anything... but I lol'das dumb looking as claiming vanilla in a no vanilla game, I'd say.
So just to be clear, you wouldn't want us to lynch him toDay off of what he said from your confirming post, correct?An explanation is fine.
I just don't expect people to vote him for that. And I'm really not gonna expect to just go at it and lynch him for a suspicion vote.
I know this wasn't addressed to me, but I'm going to insert myself into the conversation anywayWhat's more of a priority right now to you BSP?
Looking into a try-hard read, or looking into a logical fallacy?
Good question.Kantrip , if you had to pick one persons confirmation as an example of a confirmation you find to be more legitimate , who's would you pick and why ?
The vote is fine, and providing reasoning is great, but this is really scummy. Your jump on my wagon is such a safe cop-out, I don't think this is legitimate.Vote: Kantrip
for over thinking confirmation posts. RVS is one thing, but you got a scum read off someone's confirm post that literally says nothing other than "/confirming"? That's awful.
Wut.Then you wouldn't mind if 3 people artificially increase the post count day 1 would you? I challenge you to not post for the next 60 posts.
Would three people post 20 times each so that in case he has chatterbox he get's modkilled by the end of day 1? If he has chatterbox he's probably scum, since it's much more unfavorable as scum to have chatterbox.
V/LA tomorrow, going to the casino.
Wut.I'm pretty sure we can all confirm that all of us don't have chatterbox. In the unlikely case that you and you alone have chatterbox, I suspect that you would be scum. This is based off of two ideas.
1.) Your initial RVS is all over the place. Spreading suspicion while attacking those that call your method silly is somewhat scummy. You kill two birds with one stone with this approach if you are scum and chatterbox.
2.) In general chatterbox is a scummy power. It is much more unfavorable when scum have to constantly talk, this puts them in more danger than a townie with chatterbox would. Townies need to talk to find scum, scum talking leads to exposing themselves and forces them to play more active.
3.) The way you post seems to collect post counts like crazy, you probably already have like 5 times as many posts as the 4th top poster (haven't bothered to count yet.)
There's no risk for you not posting for 60 posts if you weren't chatterbox, why not accept and clear my suspicions?
Also the reason why I ask three people who aren't me to inflate the post count are two-fold.
1.) I'm V/LA tomorrow.
2.) I want to confirm that I myself am not chatterbox. I do not mind if 3 people have more posts than I do.
I'm not saying lynch you in any means Rake, but if you have chatterbox then I feel ur likely to be scum, why waste an opportunity to get a free Mod-kill?
While I won't argue with your choice of shot, I would like you to explain how Tako could be scum right now. I'm just not seeing it.I'll probably end up shooting Tako. Join me on Riddle.
This is grimy. The first paragraph comes off as joking, and then you go and say he's painting Rake in a bad light. What are you implying with that? Because I'm getting an implication that you're hinting at Tako scum since "painting Rake in a bad light" is not a town thing to do.Lol, just realized I still had this tab open and saw this crazy talk of chatterbox. Tako, why assume Rake has chatterbox restriction? Go read a game with him in it, you'll see this is how he always posts XD
That's such a left field accusation to make, why are you painting Rake in a bad light?
I don't see anything wrong with Riddle at the point of this post.I was simply agreeing with you and Rake that Rake's posting style is not particularly indicative of any restriction, since that was practically the only topic of the Day. Adding to discussions, even if the input isn't new, helps town to see where people stand on issues and isn't anti-town in any way. Perhaps I'm just used to more inane conversation early on in Day 1.
Why are you so calm about potentially being shot? Do you believe that BarDulL has a gun? If so, how serious do you think he is about likely shooting you?
Nope, as I didn't get a scum lean from Vinyl's "confirm" post.>suggesting chatterbox
>suggesting Rake be quiet even though he always plays like this
@Kantrip:
You got a scum lean from Vinyl's "confirm" post alone. I said "confirming and yes" to "are you town". Am I scum too?
I think this is reaching and completely incorrect.OK, so I read the chatterbox (thanks @BarDull) and Tako's conclusion about it being scummy sounds... hurried at best. What Rake did isn't much different than usual pregame RVS. Why do you assume it has a chatterbox restriction? The only way you can come with a reasoning like that is...
You know there's a chatterbox in game. And for some reason, you are looking for it!
Is this true, Tako?
Jumping right into legitimate discussion to bypass RVS.Ok then what was your intent. Not really, no.
Vote: Kantrip
L-3
Explain this vote. Explain how you decided Tako's whole chatterbox confusion was more scummy than whatever I did.Tako wtf...
Chatterbox? Really?
Literally only Deadpool mafia (and the superhero mafia it was based on) has ever had that restriction.
Vote: Tako
I thought you were better than this. I knew I would fool a vast majority of the playerlist into thinking I would actually announce a confirmation post as a scumtell, but I thought you'd have more sense.Tako gets the uninformed card, not sure of alignment.
Vinyl, explain why you want to buddy with me. Also, vote for someone in your next post with an explanation regarding why.
@Kantrip - This is your chance to retract your horribad grasping of the Vinyl slot and explain what you were really thinking, otherwise I'm blowing your brains out.
It feels like being told Santa is real. This playerlist reeks of a bunch of people who can't look past the surface level and who are so gullible I want to gag.@Kantrip, how's it feel knowing that you might get shot by BarDulL?
Got it.But Santa is real. Just play cave story and you'll meet him in the bushlands.
V/LA for now. I'm gonna be at some birthday; Kind of wondering if there's wifi over there.