rageagainst
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2007
- Messages
- 257
your stating specific examples, which should not at all be done when trying to look at the whole, MOST tournies were won by a top/high tier, of which fox placed consistently high in. The tier list is based on the frequency a certain character is winning tournies, and fox/falco were TOP TIER throughout most of melee history, meaning most of the time they won tournies.Wow, get with the times.
First you talk about how Azen isn't one of the top guys any more, now you're talking about tournaments in 2006, lol.
Mew2King's Marth wrecked PC's Falco four games in a row before barely beating his Peach, then winning against his Fox for two consecutive 3-0 set wins at FC-Diamond.
Mango's Jigglypuff went on a rampage through the loser's bracket at *pound* 3.
Cort consistently places very high maining Peach.
Chu gets top3 spots and sometimes even first place with Ice Climbers.
Fox isn't the only dominant character in Melee, and he wasn't the top placing character by the end of the last major Melee tourney, either, lol.
The amount of tournies won by low/bottom tiers is so insignificant is that there isn't a set placing for those characters in the tier list because there isn't enough info to draw from (one of my key arguments against using the tier list as the ultimate character ranking system)