#HBC | Red Ryu
Red Fox Warrior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2008
- Messages
- 27,486
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- NNID
- RedRyu_Smash
- 3DS FC
- 0344-9312-3352
Vote: Moosy
For now though.
For now though.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wasn't a proper vote count and I was looking for an avenue to pressure you, and I thought you voted Maven. That was sloppy on my part but this seems to more going in the direction of who was right/wrong and I won't go there. What happens if glyph is town?Okay so soup is saying I v
It's strange because my apparently terrible line of logic is netting me all the right reads while the rest of you are floundering.
I'm also giving you the benefit of doubt because you literally just said I voted for Maven, went for his lynch, and didn't try to push elsewhere which is exactly the opposite of what I did. There is absolutely no way you could have read my EoD behavior in this way. Like what?
One correct read does not equal "all the right reads"Okay so soup is saying I v
It's strange because my apparently terrible line of logic is netting me all the right reads while the rest of you are floundering.
I'm also giving you the benefit of doubt because you literally just said I voted for Maven, went for his lynch, and didn't try to push elsewhere which is exactly the opposite of what I did. There is absolutely no way you could have read my EoD behavior in this way. Like what?
No...you're not going to be able to excuse it just like that. Your posts weren't an attempt at pressuring, they were trying to fling mud without realizing there wasn't any.Wasn't a proper vote count and I was looking for an avenue to pressure you, and I thought you voted Maven. That was sloppy on my part but this seems to more going in the direction of who was right/wrong and I won't go there. What happens if glyph is town?
I'd say the conversation I'm having with you right now is more of pressuring compared to an opening statement as to why you did something, unless you think all questions are loaded.No...you're not going to be able to excuse it just like that. Your posts weren't an attempt at pressuring, they were trying to fling mud without realizing there wasn't any.
mmm...why are you trying to cop out of what I pointed out? There's really no need to resort to attacks like this as well.Moosy is in his own world glorifying his mafia ability so I'm going to proceed to ignore him until he comes back from his journey.
The fact that I want to see what he has to say before putting my vote on him again. If he hasn't given a defense that satisfies me by Wednesday, I'll put my vote back on him.Spak so what's stopping you from voting glyph now?
I'm alright with that, but how do you read the other glyph haters? If you're going on assumption that glyph is scum then certainly one of them is bussing.The fact that I want to see what he has to say before putting my vote on him again. If he hasn't given a defense that satisfies me by Wednesday, I'll put my vote back on him.
Hello? What makes you think this?I'm alright with that, but how do you read the other glyph haters? If you're going on assumption that glyph is scum then certainly one of them is bussing.
Because I don't think all the glyph voters are town.Hello? What makes you think this?
I that they jumped the gun a little bit. It seems like some of them were trying to avoid pressure for voting Maven and then just refocused it on Glyph hoping the rest of the thread would follow their lead, but that may just be the conspiracy theorist in me.I'm alright with that, but how do you read the other glyph haters? If you're going on assumption that glyph is scum then certainly one of them is bussing.
Saw a few questions aimed at me and most of them can be answered with 'I don't care how you think I should play mafia'.
If there's anything particularly critical that I get to tag me in it and I'll try to answer it sometime today.
Could you try defending these points in a way that isn't 'I don't care how you think I should play Mafia'? Because anybody could just say 'That's just how I play Mafia' to anything that they do and then we'd get literally nowhere.I have re-read the game and tend to agree that that Glyph seems pretty scummy. In addition to everything that went on with the shot (only slightly scummy because apparently that's normal meta for him), he didn't respond well to pressure, instantly dropped my case whenever I unvoted him, has been completely inactive since Tuesday, tunneled a slot that has looked fairly town-ish all day long after trying to shoot him, had a weird post saying that his slot didn't need to make it to endgame for him to win, said that he would self-vote in an instant if it meant his reads were followed up on (which assumes he knows more about people's slots than the average townie), and he hasn't really contributed much to the thread other than being hotly debated for his controversial actions.
We know nothing about the alignment of the RB so it's fairly null, especially when the claimed RB happens on a no kill.#HBC | Laundry does bardull claiming a shot (he antagonized fml saying he was going to shoot him) and outright claiming to be RBed influence your read on him at all?
Pls give your thoughts on the Maven wagon, how it formed, and what slot on it you think is scummiest.Still hella busy recently, but if you boners insist on wagoning me then I should say that I am hated so don't put me at L-1 cuz I'll die.
Saw a few questions aimed at me and most of them can be answered with 'I don't care how you think I should play mafia'.
If there's anything particularly critical that I get to tag me in it and I'll try to answer it sometime today.
Well, I thought everyone who voted Glyph at the start of D1 could be in cahoots and trying to shed attention from the Maven vote to get us back to focusing on Glyph, and then I decided I would exclude Fanny from the conspiracy team because he actually tagged Glyph and voted as an encouragement to defend himself (by the way, why didn't Glyph get a prod yesterday?). Then I looked at the team, saw Moosy (who didn't vote Maven at all, but I heavily disagree with his voting logic) and that was pretty much every Glyph vote since D2. The way you talked about it made the entire Glyph vote at the start of D2 seem like a huge deal, when it was only ~14% of the player list. I thought the conspiracy theory would be the scum trying to start a wagon, but my theory is now you overreacting and trying to start an undeserved push against Fanny and (a slightly deserved push against) Moosy.Tell me more about your conspiracy theory, as that didn't completely answer me.
Haven't reached the laundry conclusion because my read was unabashedly based on meta and overall feeling, but I don't wanna give laundry a free pass because he knows how to sell himself and I wanna look more into his angle after being wrong on maven. It just annoyed me people like moosy came out and said he was town because he lead the lynch.Soup, do you think Laundry is scum? Who's side are you more on in the Fanny vs. Bardull situation? I'd also like your responses to my questions I asked earlier.
I want to just blurt out all my scum-reads, but at the same time I know that would not be the wisest thing to do.
Why? do you think he's using "I didn't vote for Maven so I'm innocent" as his shield?Vote: Moosy
For now though.
Inoffensive. I didn't like that either but he's more of a "wait and see" slot for me, and his explanation for why he dropped it wasn't worth pursuing as he isn't inclined to keep pushing it unless there is context for him being scummy for doing so, which I don't think is the case.What do you make of FML? They are someone on my radar because I keep looking at their play and not really seeing scum-hunting, but fire fanning.
I mean, they made a big deal about pushing Red Ryu yesterDay, but then simultaneously folded onto Zaixl within a page span.
Takamagahara
What is the hypothetical outcome on a player not being found for Zaixl? I'm exhausted in player resources, but I was curious as to what will happen.
No idea how you got that I dislike moosy or fanny, I merely asked your opinion and you came at me pretty harshly. How do you read moosy comparative to fanny?Well, I thought everyone who voted Glyph at the start of D1 could be in cahoots and trying to shed attention from the Maven vote to get us back to focusing on Glyph, and then I decided I would exclude Fanny from the conspiracy team because he actually tagged Glyph and voted as an encouragement to defend himself (by the way, why didn't Glyph get a prod yesterday?). Then I looked at the team, saw Moosy (who didn't vote Maven at all, but I heavily disagree with his voting logic) and that was pretty much every Glyph vote since D2. The way you talked about it made the entire Glyph vote at the start of D2 seem like a huge deal, when it was only ~14% of the player list. I thought the conspiracy theory would be the scum trying to start a wagon, but my theory is now you overreacting and trying to start an undeserved push against Fanny and (a slightly deserved push against) Moosy.
Yes, it could be looked at this way too, or it could be looked at as a subtle attempt at applying more pressure to the J slot.What disagreement? There's no "disagreement" to be had because J wasn't making any argument there. He made what I thought was a dumb and pointless question, hence the tone, I was trying to get an answer, and a read, out of him.
Try again? I don't need to; if "a perspective that ignores player's intents and thread context" equates to being mechanical, then you are throwing a presupposition into the question that obviously doesn't make Thug look great."Mechanical" Suggest Thug was looking at the game from a perspective that ignores player's intents and thread context, try again.
WIFOM means that an action can be looked at in one of two ways. Wine-In-Front-Of-Me. He could have done this because of this, but he might be smart enough to know that would happen and did this, and so on.I know you can read Bardul, so read again. I didn't chalk up his actions to WIFOM I was telling everyone else NOT TO because everyone keeps saying "why would Scum!Glyph put so much attention on himself?" A textbook-definition WIFOM approach, something that you are STILL doing with this slot.
Invalid, given the above.
This is what I mean by tone. Reads as an arrogant wiener. Regardless, I feel like the post you are referring to easily could have been a subtle attempt at misdirection.lmao, me trying to bounce off Laundry to get better reads on him, and his targets is bothersome just because you are part of the question? Please.
This is just plain not true. If our reads are starkly different in that you are pushing slots that I feel are likely to be Town throughout the entire day phase, of course I'm going to be giving you a perplexed look. Having similar reads is actually a good thing because it allows me to push my agenda. I'm just curious, and it's not entirely relevant, what exactly are you basing your scum reads on? Is it just contradictions that people spout in thread, or are you actually trying to read into intent?Startk reads doesn't mean much., just as having similar reads with someone else shouldn't mean much either. How is this worrisome? Why act now instead of before?
ScumGlyph is simply not capable of planning like this and ensuring his team's victory. No one in this thread is like that. This is probably the most contrived statement you've made all game.He doesn't have to do a damn thing to "lead" once he has set the seeds and the rest of thread moves in motion, specially considering that if he is scum, his teamates would do that for him.
I don't know what this is referring to.what
This portion seems pretty salty, but I guess you kind of have to concede to excusing yourself with policy.You conveniently leave out that it was about 1 hour to deadline, Maven had 6 votes, and Glyph had 3. No one else was gunning for glyph, it was either vote Maven, or risk a no lynch. Get out of of here with this nonsense.
continued: you are proposing I am taking a 'textbook' WIFOM approach to his slot, but that's just not true. The alternative you are suggesting is so completely unlikely to happen. In standard WIFOM cases, one side has almost as much of a likelihood of occurring as another, but what you are suggesting is that Glyph came into the thread, tried to 'plant the seeds' or whatever you want to call it, and then try to set everything in motion for his mates to take control of the thread. What are you even on? If this is true, then I demand to hear from you who his scum mates are, because I did not see any of his mates capitalizing on his 'seed planting.' I'm calling bull**** on your seed planting theory.WIFOM means that an action can be looked at in one of two ways. Wine-In-Front-Of-Me. He could have done this because of this, but he might be smart enough to know that would happen and did this, and so on.
The thing is, I don't think Glyph walked into this thread thinking he was going to get away scott-free