Azure Rune
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2006
- Messages
- 251
...........
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But hell HAS frozen over heres ur proof:i will defend them till hell freezes over
Oh yeah, I've seen this before. I believe the full essay was a little longer and the conclusion was different. THIEFBut hell HAS frozen over heres ur proof:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their faith, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can reliably project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities:
1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls
enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase
until all Hell breaks loose.
2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in
Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell
freezes over.
So which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my freshman year that, "it will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you, and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over.
TADA
srry, i just had to show this
or course not, link is way too slow for me and i don't like the use of projectiles, i use ganon and i still don't get how link has the advantage over ganon, ganon has everything but projectile and grab reach and ganon still has grab combo'sBut you mentioned Link vs Marth, which is an even matchup.
btw, Link has a slight advantage on Ganon and IC (spam ftw).
He has the upper hand on Peach (not as much as YLink), Jiggs (more than YLink), and Samus.
This is based of what I was told/read from Trevyn (Zarelid) and Germ, what I've noticed from other Links (like Azen and Aniki), and my own experience lol. I'm pretty sure you don't use Link when you go to tournaments.
Ganon is definately slower than Linkor course not, link is way too slow for me and i don't like the use of projectiles, i use ganon
Yes, he has grab combos...and what else? Link outspaces Ganon's moves, he has spam, a good edgeguarding game (and consider the fact that Ganon is easy to edgeguard), good setups and juggles, blah blah.and i still don't get how link has the advantage over ganon, ganon has everything but projectile and grab reach and ganon still has grab combo's
Bingo,as they dont mean anything to me either.The game comes down to the skill of the person,not the character.Because if the #1 rank guy could destory you with a "top tier"character,he can probably do the same exact thing with a "lower tier"character.Knowledge people,not basing characters on tournment results or crowd favorites.To me personally the tier list means nothing to me. It is really all about mindgames!
I can play good with every character except bowser and mewtwo. And the only reason why I dont know how to play with those two yet is because I just never really "tried them out"
yet. Ive owned peaches at high level of play with my link. every character is a beast you just have to unlock its hidden power!
And there's a Bowser around here that can beat just about everyone with him. I'm willing to bet you'd lose to his bowser too. That doesn't make bowser good however, he's just a good player.So chess with only pawns and a king, that would suck.
So, picking bowser against any character to win, that would suck as well.
I can beat the bowsers around here with a pichu, or even a pretty mean y link who I don't consider bad, but bowser could knock them into the sky with a good hit. So the bowsers around here suck, but there is one player who ***** with every character except bowser, and I can beat his bowser, so yes, I agree with magnum and gimpy here; picking bowser, pretty much sets you up to lose.
Link does really well vs. peach, not to mention that peach player sucks, and you have no idea what mind games are. Unless that peach goes by vidjo then that means nothing. Aside from the fact that it really has no meaning in the first place.To me personally the tier list means nothing to me. It is really all about mindgames!
I can play good with every character except bowser and mewtwo. And the only reason why I dont know how to play with those two yet is because I just never really "tried them out"
yet. Ive owned peaches at high level of play with my link. every character is a beast you just have to unlock its hidden power!
just because someone agrees with your point of view doesn't make it correct. Just because Azen could **** you with bowser doesn't mean a thing, if all the characters are equal why don't we see Azen going bowser vs. ken's marth? Or king's jigglypuff, or PC chris' fox? Honestly, stop being so naive.Bingo,as they dont mean anything to me either.The game comes down to the skill of the person,not the character.Because if the #1 rank guy could destory you with a "top tier"character,he can probably do the same exact thing with a "lower tier"character.Knowledge people,not basing characters on tournment results or crowd favorites.
Yo-Yo is amazing.And there's a Bowser around here that can beat just about everyone with him. I'm willing to bet you'd lose to his bowser too. That doesn't make bowser good however, he's just a good player.
qftJUST PLAY YOUR FAV CHARACTER AND HAVE FUN WITH WHATEVA YOU DO
But when Azen plays low tier against just about anyone in the top 30/40 in the country, he either loses or comes really close to losing. Low tiers aren't good in tourneys, and Azen plays mostly mid tier anyway(Luigi+Zelda).It really depends on who these 'better' players are. Cause, in comparison to Azen, that doesn't really make sense.
Luigi and Zelda are low tier. <.<But when Azen plays low tier against just about anyone in the top 30/40 in the country, he either loses or comes really close to losing. Low tiers aren't good in tourneys, and Azen plays mostly mid tier anyway(Luigi+Zelda).
Meh, on the new tier list yeah, they both used to be mid.Luigi and Zelda are low tier. <.<
This topic reaks.
Zelda being low tier is a ridiculous notion!Meh, on the new tier list yeah, they both used to be mid.
get froooooooooeeeeeedddIt really depends on who these 'better' players are. Cause, in comparison to Azen, that doesn't really make sense.
Which explains why people generally get angry when they get beat by u-b spamming links. It happens and the reason why it happens is that it can be useful in some cases. You never run the risk of it failing by the edge when your opponent is below you. It lasts as long as **** and if ss you can get an instant low percent ko. **** like this is so underrated.Link's Up B, if spammed, will get you punished. If it hits, good for you. If it misses, you get punished for it. Depending on your opponent, even lose a stock. If Up -B didn't have lag, you could cancel it when you wanted, and was unpunishable, then good players would, without a doubt, spam the hell out of it. Look at the shine, or (I'm not sure about this one) Bowsers Fortress.
People don't use moves because they think it's gay, or cheap. They avoid the moves because they are detrimental. Link's Up B is an okay move, semi spike, and has good power behind it. But it has it's risks, and each time you use it, you run the risk of it failing.
Fox's shine, however, if fast, effective, and not exactly easy to punish. Expecially in the hands of a good player.
because Fox and Falco created their own tier...most of the characters in low tier are in the same numbered positions that they were in back in the old tier list lolWhy the hell is Luigi low tier now?