ahhahhhahah
obvious lyncher gambit is obvious
yeah, i pointed that out as well.
okay i found a computer to use
@Nix #998: Why the rush man? How come we can't chill and talk about what we're gonna do? Chill
@Omni #992: Yes, if we are wrong about gheb, we lose 2 nights, but what if YOU're wrong about kirby? Then we lose the same amount of nights. We lose a night no matter who we lynch wrong, so that really isn't an argument to not lynch someone. If we worried about losing nights always, we'd never lynch anyone.
@Omni #988: Dude, it may be WIFOM, but it makes complete sense. Think about it for a second: all Lyncher has to do is take out 1 person and they win and exit, so why would they NOT lie and come out as town to get their target lynched? Think for a minute
@Mac: I'm glad you're rereading and all, but could you focus on our current problem? Gheb or Kirby being town are mutally exclusive, so why don't we focus on our 50/50 chance of scum, sound good? And to your point of leaving the indy for the moment: they don't neccesarily have to be a lyncher. In Eor's hellhouse, there was a role that had to find another at night to win, so it could easily be that. And like I said, I strongly doubt that if Gheb wins, he will just leave the game. Plus, on the off chance we ARE wrong, then we have Kirby nailed as scum.
@Gheb: I have an idea, why don't you stop just saying "WTF is up with this lyncher crap?" Its not an adequate substitute for a defense, and if youre trying to subliminally implant the idea that its ridiculous, its not really workin, is it?
@Nix 999: The idea of giving a non-PR info about the game isn't that uncommon, its a good way to give everyone special roles while not overloading the game with PRs.
