I still think that it feels a little off since you seemed to emphasize the self sacrifice so much after the fact (it felt more like "hey, look at me being gung-ho for town" rather than just a genuine play). You also could've introduced yourself to the lunch pool to spread town votes and unfocus us, but that's admittedly unlikely. Your reasoning behind the play makes more sense now, but your emphasis of said play seems forced.
Let's take a look at it in context, shall we? The following is from my analysis of the Ro/Ran scumteam.
At first glance, this pairing seems like a poor scumteam. They sparred pretty much all of Day 1 and in the end, a wagon technically started by Ro against Ran ended in a successful lynch.
The issue, of course, is with Ran's play. Ran pushed the Marshy lynch to L-1, and when it lost momentum, rather than pushing the next wagon onto Ro, with whom he had been sparring constantly and for whom he had an easy ally and fallguy for a mislynch (Xatres), he instead goes after Adum.
Two different players (Xat and RR) had already noted that Ran not putting his money where his mouth is was odd.
Not only that, but even as the momentum for the Adum lynch was being cut off, Ro jumped in and voted Adum herself. When TWO perfectly good lynch candidates (Xat and Ran), with whom she had already publically called liars, were right there for the taking. Xatres had even offered himself up as a sacrificial lamb for town's benefit.
The emphasis here is not at all on Xat offering himself on the a lynch candidate. The only reason it is brought up is in the context of Ro's vote on Adum.
Ro had been riding Ran for awhile and had called Xat a liar directly. So why did Ro jump in to vote for Adum? Ran was at least an option for several people, and her second scumread, Xatres, had suggested his lynch could be beneficial for town (basically a lite-version of Adum's play D3).
The point wasn't "OMG, look how townie Xat's sacrifice is." The point was, "OMG, look at Ro ignoring her scumreads to go along with lynching Adum for no reason."
But you could've at least given me time to post stuff to be useful to town for after I die. We both know there isn't really anything I could've done to save this slot because there's a dozen questions that the previous holder left unanswered after leaving under pressure, so why not just give me a day to leave a paper trail?
This isn't a real response to my argument. Why, if I'm convinced your slot is scum, would I consider giving you the opportunity to break from Ro's play and try to clear yourself? I've discussed why this is a problem at length.
Unless one of you or Adum aren't still alive. I'm fairly confident in my Vinyl and Marshy reads, so if one of you two are gone, town likely wouldn't instantly lose LyLo if one of you guys instantly threw a vote on me. The problem is that I would have to convince Vinyl/Marshy that you're scum, which would be a tall order. Your logic requires that scum lies between you and Adum in that hypothetical town!Spak case, so why do you have Vinyl as your next in line for lynching?
Are you even listening? Assume XatvSpak is TvT for a second. We fail to lynch you and lynch Adum instead. Adum flips town. How do you really think the next day is going to go? Scum would be foolish to kill Xat or Spak when Xat has been so keen on lynching Spak's slot all game long. If XatvSpak is TvT, and we enter LyLo, town loses. The goes if by some miracle you pull off a Xat lynch today. If Marshy or Vinyl is scum, all they have to do is leave you and Adum alive for a victory.
Literally the only way you make it out of this game without being lynched is if you manage to lynch Xat or Adum today, and then NK the other in the night. But even then, if you are town, do you really see yourself not being lynched in LyLo? When BOTH threats to you are eliminated and both flip town?
Your lynch is the only one that can happen toDay if town has any chance of victory.
If I got replaced a day earlier, I still wouldn't have had a NK. Hypothetically, I would've killed you and called any accusations WIFOM. It would've been one less slot that wants me dead and I would've felt little to no consequences because I would've said that NK logic doesn't get far.
I doubt it. A town!Xat flip would be too condemning. Literally the only defense you or Ro has been able to come up with against my slot today is to call me scum back. Do you really think that on top of the mountain of evidence already against you, that my flipping town wouldn't make the rest of town instantly lynch you?
WIFOM objectives can only go so far. At the end of the day, strategy is strategy.
Until the flip, which is mod-confirmed and it sounds like you'll inevitably get.
Okay, and? You keep calling yourself confirmed town and referencing mod confirmation as if you an subliminally program everyone into believing you are town.
Given that you've come to literally the exact same reads as Ro, I seriously doubt you've added anything of substance by hanging around.
Scum!Adum killing J would work out fine because I'm not convinced anything bad will happen to you, even after my flip. Anyways, right now I'm arguing that you killed J, not Adum. You're in a comfy enough spot that while my flip could reflect poorly upon you, you'd still be higher on most people's town lists than Adum (and might be able to manipulate Vinyl).
I'm pretty sure if you flip town, Vinyl's going to be FoS the hell out of my slot in LyLo. He's trying to be cryptic about it, but it's pretty obvious that's what's going on in his head. Seriously, anyone who doesn't take a serious look at my slot after a town!Spak flip would be foolish.