Don't worry, we should have a decision soon.
Pretty much what I predict is that either I will get lynched, or rake will get lynched, which still works out perfectly for town within the confines of my game theory.
I'm just going to come out and explain why I'm sure rake is scum. (I really haven't analyzed day 2 posts, this is all review of day 1 posts.)
Consider what bardul did day 1 from the perspective that he is confirmed scum. His first action was 3 fold; apply pressure to rake, explain some mafia to moosey, then defend moosey from rake by saying he should be excused for being a newbie. At first glance, this would seem to point toward moosey being scum, but taking the next few actions takes into consideration this makes way more sense that rake is scum. So let's continue.
The next thing that happens is that gheb calls out bardul for applying pressure, and I follow suit. Bardul pivots his attention to me, and mitigates the attention on rake. At this point, everyone seems comfortable that Rake is lean town; thus he further detracts attention with his 221, simultaneously detracting from gheb's call out against bardul by asking others to ignore him and focusing more attention on me. This is further emphasized by his 223.
Irrelevant. Rake was not in lynch danger.
This to me says that gheb was on the right trail here. At this point, Orbo and Rake are the most suspicious if you consider that gheb's 141 is on target; gheb is right to question orbo's defence on rake, and barduls hate on rake. Scum applying unconfirmable pressure that can't be followed up puts rake in a good position here, because he would seem to be more clear once the pressure is alleviated.
This is actually a logically sound point. I can't refute it, I guess it was just reading too much into things ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In his 339 he both defends bardul against gheb and me, and legitimizes bardul's attack on me. (which I still find to be BS, there was no correlation between me attacking bardul because I doubted rake but I digress). In his 340 he further elaborates by predicting that bardul would claim, even though bardul really has no reason to claim. This could be a sign that he knew that bardul was considering claiming based on scum chat, but this is still pretty shaky at this point.
This is pretty tin-foil hatty. This is plausible, but unlikely.
In rake's 344, he tries to shake gheb off of bardul's trail (gheb is the strongest/cleanest player against bardul at this point) by trying to his displace his attention to other players.
Confirmation bias. I would contend that he was simply raising another point.
Lastly, after bardul has been hammered, he predicts at this point that bardul is scum, and that I'm also scum. He puts no thought into what bardul's flip actually means, unlike maven's 463.
Or, perhaps, he did put thought into it and was wrong, kinda like you.
At the end of the day, he's either scum that bardul has constantly defended, or he's a town that I can't rely on to think like town. Honestly I'd say it's about 80 scum / 20 useless town at this point, totally a worthy candidate of tunnel lynching.
The real question is this, if I were town, isn't my play to call out bardul great? If I'm scum, how does anything I've posted make any sense? You gotta trust that while I'm not perfect (I ****ed up bardul's finish, I got held up by the fact the he might have failed at giving me a silent nod), I know how to play this game. Everything that I see with bardul being scum is to allow rake to fly under the radar, there's ALOT of attention from bardul into rake considering that he applies pressure once then pivots to defending him all game against gheb.